| joecoin |
02-10-2008 01:07 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Max
(Post 66966)
Hi,
yes he could do... but why he have to do ?
I think he knows what kind of signals or variations there are (if any) ... so he doesn't need scope on the forest to know what's going on... assuming all these LRLs work and are not just self convincements... selective memory stuff... etc etc etc
If he will show you the signals or signals variations maybe you'll understand which principle is behind that things... the OPERATING principle I mean (always... cause I'm skeptic... IF IT EXIST FOR REAL). ;)
Now... do you think really he wanna tell you or show pictures of that ?
I think not... cause otherwise he posted already that stuff here... are years now we are talking about the same things and that we're making same polemics here... the same as in Robert's post... I've done myself for a number of months.
If any principle exist... he will not tell you about... will not show pictures of it... you will not get anything useful to build device or similar stuff ... but just will see some block diagram or minimized schematics and some old photos. You know already.
So... or you belive his words as them are... without proofs I mean, or you'll better just ignore all this stuff of LRL and start building your next conventional metal detector.
Really easy ! :lol:
Kind regards,
Max
|
I don't know why he would have to do this, he said "I can't to imagine running in the inland, forest, etc., with an oscilloscope or similar instrument trying to capture the phenomenon in a screen.", so I showed him an oscilliscope that he could run with. I don't care if he shows pictures or not. I'm just helping solve the problem of taking readings IF HE WANTS TO.:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: |
