Originally Posted by Dell Winders (Post 101044)

W.I.S.:lol: :lol:

Originally Posted by Theseus (Post 101030)

I know.... but some here have a "belief system" that includes the idea that buried treasure emits some type of RF (or other radiations); and I was merely pointing out that in fact - THEY DO NOT.

Originally Posted by Esteban (Post 101075)

When the treasure is entirely closed in iron box, this can not detected at distance because this iron acts as a shield.

Originally Posted by Esteban (Post 101075)

When the treasure is entirely closed in iron box, this can not detected at distance because this iron acts as a shield.

Originally Posted by Theseus (Post 101085)

Are you making an inference that if the buried treasure were not in an iron box, that it can be detected from long distances? If so, please tell us how and provide a believable demonstration. :D

Also, is iron the only thing that will block "your phenomenon"? What about a box made of steel, or glass, or a plastic garbage bag, or a wooden box lined with tin foil, or a leather pouch. :???:

How about if I place buried treasure in plastic zip-lock refrigerator bag? :???:

Inquiring minds would like to know..... :rolleyes:

Originally Posted by Esteban (Post 101093)

......because detection is for good conductive metals.
But always the metal must be buried some years.

Originally Posted by WM6 (Post 101088)

See on picture below invincible gold ions radiation taked by Kirilian camera:

http://i89.servimg.com/u/f89/14/09/85/82/spark_10.jpg

Gold is buried in metal box 1.73m deep.
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/www.p...s/spark_ad.jpg

Originally Posted by Agribus (Post 101119)

I can't believe: If a treasure, shows radiation in a Kirlian camera, this would be the first choice in gold exploration!

We only need a "real time kirlian TV"

Seems so good to be true! Come on! Any further references?

Originally Posted by Agribus (Post 101119)

I can't believe: If a treasure, shows radiation in a Kirlian camera, this would be the first choice in gold exploration!

We only need a "real time kirlian TV"

Seems so good to be true! Come on! Any further references?

Originally Posted by Theseus (Post 101100)

If you compare the conductivity of iron, steel, copper, bronze, silver or gold with glass, plastic or dry wood; they would all be considered "good" conductors.

I must be missing something here.... ;)

Originally Posted by Esteban (Post 101143)

Are good conductors, but doesn't exhibit the capability for to create the "field". Once was detected at some distance a complete roll of wire for fences (buried and oxidated), but maybe because form a kind of shape or "coil"... as you can "see", only pistol shows these effects.:lol:

If you use many wires in pistol, then you can detect also ferrous objects. But with few number of turns in coil, the coil almost don't be affected by iron and other ferric oxidated objects. Except... few months ago a "mountain" of big nails used in rails was detected at some meters, maybe buried more than 100 years ago. The rail at sight, open, in the air, don't be detected, but the acumulation of these intrincated iron buried for many years is another thing.

Originally Posted by Theseus (Post 101153)

I REPEAT:

Are you making an inference that if the buried treasure were not in an iron box, that it can be detected from long distances? If so, please tell us how and provide a believable demonstration. :D

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 101151)

Hi Esteban.
My pistol also detected iron "rusted buckle". As it is bad conductor, how did it make the ".......field"???

Regards:)

Originally Posted by Esteban (Post 101222)

In general, the iron isn't detectable with pistol (except if you design for iron), but iron object near valuable target can mask the detection.

Originally Posted by Geo (Post 101231)

Ohhh what did you remember me!!!! A friend has a Fisher... very deep machine, very very good discrimination. I think CZ20... not sure this time.
When a ceramic or iron is near the target (coin, ring etc) it don't detect neither target neither ceremic or iron :angry::angry:
So the sure is one.... my PD is not Fisher :lol::lol:

Regards:)

Originally Posted by Max (Post 100285)

1. not that way: the buried metal emits POSITIVE ions, cause lose electrons and losing negative charge atoms become positive ions

2. both old and "new" metals emit POSITIVE ions if right conditions exist

3. you need a positive ion sniffer: if you use a "squid" device you can do that from several meters far away, but device have huge price

4. easy to put in words, but practice is another thing: you need to cool the sniffer "squid" device at very low temperature, this way it's less sensitive to noise and can make more accurate detection, that means you can increase detection range also

Squid use superconducting material... and are hard to find and build without proper technology. Here you see in the picture are old sensors now obsolete , but you can make an idea of what's needed...

Kind regards,
Max