Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Mike, I have known, and worked with a number of Scientist. One who befriended, and advised me on MFD & Harmonic Induction in1987 was a retired NASA, Earth Scientist. (I still have his letters of advise, and encouragement)
The term Molecular Frequency Generator (MFG) was applied to this concept by Scientist.
One Scientist I sought advise from (Physcist/Chemical Engineer) stated he had worked with Einstein, and knew him very well. He said Einstein, was an avid Dowser. Could some of the great theories from the mind of Einstein, have been the result of Mental Dowsing. From my own satisfactory results with Mental Dowsing, I can certainly see the possibility.
Another Scientist (physicist) a customer I went to meet in Texas, was using my product on a Treasure Search I attended. He told me he had figured how the MFD concept worked. (light wave particles) Although his theory may be partially correct, and Light wave particles may be incorporated in the process, I personally, don't see this as the primary principle of MFD operation. But, who am I to argue with Scientist?
I have customers who are university Professors, Geologist, Archaeologist, who use MFD as a tool to aid them behind the scenes, but not in front of their academic peers for fear of ridicule. Using a pair of Rods to meter a "field" has the stigma of Dowsing, and has the public appearance of being un-Scientific.
At my request, a Scientist friend has had telephone conversations with Carl Morland. I won't mention the superlatives he used in describing Carl's un-scientific approach and mentality.
Mike, in my experience, the Scientist, that I have met, and known over the years have been super nice, open minded, down to earth people, with only one exception that matches your description. He was a bio-chemist.
Actually, for the project I am working on now, I was recommended by a Scientist, working with NOAA.
These are not real Scientist, posting their vile on Geotech. They are just petty people seeking our attention under Scientific pretense, who make a mockery of real Science. Dell
|
Wow... That is impressive!
You have real scientists using your Omnitron products to hunt for treasure, and several super nice, open minded scientists recommend you. I think you finally have me convinced that your Omnitron products work. So now I am reading your web page describing the Omnitron product line. ... Yup even your Omnitron page has stories of customers saying they can quickly find hidden dollars using the X-scan. But I don't see any mention of these NASA and NOAA scientists on your page telling how MFD works, or talking about how amazing the Omnitron products are.
Now I am starting to wonder....
Are these scientists real, or just people you made up?
Are the customers claiming your X-scan works to find hidden dollars real? Or did you make them up too?
If these scientists know how MFD works, then why don't they explain the details to us?
Why no article by these scientists on your web page to explain it for all of us prospective customers?
I wonder who these scientist are.... Maybe they are the same customers who you posted on your web page saying the X_scan works, but you didn't bother to tell us they are scientists?
Does your phase "stupid is as stupid does" apply to people who will stupidly believe anything you tell them, while ignoring the preponderance of evidence that suggests there is a fraud being perpetrated?
But wait... I know how we can settle the answer to these questions very simply.
Can you hold a public demonstration of your X-scan find hidden dollars we put inside a house? This will demonstrate once and for all whether there's any truth to the stories on your web page about how well the X-scan works. And it will show us if any scientist had any reason to believe MFD works and recommend your method.
Best wishes,
J_P