J_P said above
.......Of course, there are unknown conditions that can influence the performance of any LRL that is said to utilise RF reception to locate treasure. We know that RF receptiion is influenced by atmospheric cycles that change during the day and over larger time periods. But with enough tests in the database, we can at least have an idea whether it works or not..........
I strongly agree whith the above statement from J_P and I also agree whith the following one
.... After all, most metal detectorists don't mind if watchers report how well their detectors work......
But I am not very proud to say that even myself belongs to that category as well.
Most of the time it was friends of mine there as well that now know what my LRL could do but again it can not be all of you having the same experience as them.
So I agree J_P that this comes up as a story but anyway is better than sitting there saying nothing anyway.
When you have something that does the job then it is much more difficult to spend time convincing others and especially when they ask you to test your LRL in a pre-set procedure.
It is like you are saying to everybody that my name is George and then they start calling you Nick.It upsets you, as simple as that.
And this is the main reason that nobody wants to prove anything to anybody.
There are Dowsers out there that they can convince skeptics just in a minute whith many different ways but they sit there and laugh.They are considering it as waste of time.
Skeptics are like nightbirds they can see certain things and only at nighttime.
Happy new year to everybody!
|