Quote:
Originally Posted by Funfinder
@ Qiaozhi
Thank you very much for the info!
Do you think the chinese Electroscope uses the same "Pseudo - Circuit" as Carl Moreland had disassembled in the shown link?
@ Cyclonite
It's always good to be sceptical after all those false LRL claims floating around. Imported chinese LRLs could be especially dangerous or a waste of money because of lack testing this before. But on the other hand I can't imagine the company can sell such devices for a longer time if they are completly nonworking crap. So far we even don't know what those will cost - perhaps just 200 bucks.
Shure, it is some money, but sometimes life's a gamble and you have to bet on the right horse. Especially because so far no single one person from this forum seems to has tested the Chinese LRL so far. We need some english writing chinese guys here who can support us and test all their homemade detectors!  |
Of course we cannot be certain, without buying one and dismantling it, but it probably works no better than the original.
In answer to your statement: "... I can't imagine the company can sell such devices for a longer time if they are completly nonworking crap."
There are plenty of examples of "nonworking crap" being sold worldwide, and this has been the case for many years. To quote Einstein: "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe".