Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Player
Hi Goldfinder,
There are also a lot of technically oriented people who don't want to hear a lot of conclusions that have no basis in fact to fill the remote sensing forum. The reason I point out the hot air balloons is because this is a technical forum, not a forum full of hot air. As you recall, Carl set up this forum with a rule to keep the hot air out:
Be factual. If you make an extraordinary claim, be prepared to get challenged.
I am not simply following the forum rules. I am also providing an incentive to LRL developers to do their homework before they make statements of fact based on guesses. Hopefully Funfinder will actually do some testing to see what causes the beeping when a helicopter flies by at over 1 Km distance. If this happens, then we won't have casual readers thinking the circuit detects the static field of distant aircraft. We will have some substantial evidence that makes sense to explain what is happening in the circuit. And we also won't have educated readers laughing at silly un-substantiated conclusions they read in the Geotech forum.
Best wishes,
J_P
|
----
I was just kidding you.
I agree with your approach. If something like an LRL device works regardless whether its dowsing (disguised or not) then it should be testable. Just as a normal metal detector is quite testable.
goldfinder