Hi hung,
I saw your interesting and informative message to Qiaozhi:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by hung
All I know is that you are one of the 'pretend to be scientists' here who completely lack the scientific understanding to explain and comprehend the physical events related to the concept of long range substance location and keeps bashing manufacturers and users.
Someday there would be a consequence.
We'll see.
|
Actually, I don't think Qiaozhi ever pretended to be a scientist. I think he is among many other technically trained and accomplished people who prefer to see scientific methods used to determine what works or does not. I suppose opening an electronic device to see what's inside it, or trying to follow the instructions to see if the device does what it is claimed to do are not considered scientific, but then nobody who is looking at the H3Tec locators claims to be a scientist except some of the people who the factory reps claim are scientists that contributed to the development of the H3Tec.
Are the H3Tec factory scientists pretend scientists?
Who knows? H3Tec did not say who these scientists are.
But they did say the H3Tec could fail to find the silver bar in Carl's pocket as he walked in front of it because the locator may have been tuned to a different silver isotope than the one found in Carl's silver bar.
I am not a scientist either, but I know the smell of BS, and I know it is not possible for a silver bar to be deficient in either of the two stable silver isotopes that you could tune an isotope detector to identify (if this machine was really capable of detecting an isotope of silver). This leads me to think there is no scientist associated with the H3Tec, as scientists know the isotope signature of natural silver and manufactured silver bars, and they would not say anything that stupid. Could H3Tec be lying to us?
There are many manufacturers and promoters of fake LRLs who would say stupid things such as that to us. I have read all manner of stupid pseudoscience published by LRL manufacturers and promoters, which makes me think the pretend scientists are mostly found among the supporters of LRLs. For example, I even heard one "pretend to be scientist" post in this forum that gold has DNA which produces a substance that coats the metal to help fight against oxidation.
Did that post come from Qiaozhi? I don't think so.
Best wishes
J_P