View Single Post
  #257  
Old 12-12-2010, 07:02 PM
J_Player's Avatar
J_Player J_Player is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California
Posts: 4,382
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Jose de La Mancha
Afternon J-Play : you posted --> In order to detect an extremely weak signal, this signal must first exist
****************
Obvious? Every activity of your brain produces a transmitable wave, we need look no further for our example. So, does telepathy exist?

Don Jose de La Mancha
"I exist to Live, not live to exist".
Interesting question.
If telepathy exists, then it could be theoretically be used to detect an impossibly weak signal from a distant location that already completed several revolutions of a universe which bends on itself.
On the other hand, telepathy could theoretically also detect a signal that did not exist, or that fizzled out and stopped after travelling some finite distance.

So does telepathy exist?
According to many proofs seen on the internet, it definitely exsists.
But then, according to many other proofs seen on the internet, it definitely does not exsist.

This raises the question: What can we believe?
Are we stuck in the perpetual condition of eternal torment "catch-22" style?
I suppose the question of the existence of the universe is more basic than the question of the existence of telepathy.
So I would say we must first determine if the universe actually exists before we can make presumptions about the existence of telepathy or proofs thereof.

Best wishes,
J_P
Reply With Quote