Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)
jp, I told you I am not here to defend H3TEC. Your words mean nothing to me as I consider every skeptic (and even some claimed-to-be proponents) to be unqualified to even discuss LRL's. You really need to get over the holier-than-thou logic thing you have. Here's a book for you "Knowing Your Intuitive Mind".
...I am not referring to Tim. I'm talking about those who do not know what a signal line is.
|
Hi Mike(Mont),
Once again, you are demonstrating your failure to recognize what my words are here for.
I never said you were here to defend U3Tec. We can all read how you made that point clear in your first post.
Perhaps you should go back and read what was written and maybe understand that I was addressing two statements you made which seem a bit odd to me.
(These two statements coming from someone who claims to have a very logical mind developed through years of geometry and higher math).
If you scroll back you will see I was addressing these two statements you made:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)
I have never used one so I don't know. Anyone here tried one? Didn't think so but that never stopped anyone from claiming they kknow all about it.
|
and:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)
... So they blame the LRL when it is really their own fault.
|
And you also recall this is an open forum... ie: a place where people can discuss ideas, which is exactly what I did.
In case you didn't understand it, I offered an alternate opinion to your statement that
"people blame the LRL when it is really their own fault".
In some cases what you say about blaming the equipment could be true.
But there is an overwhelming body of evidence in the case of H3Tec that leads any normal person to believe the thing does not work.
A normal person would feel that they are correct if they blamed the H3Tec locator for not finding hidden treasure instead of blaming themselves.
H3Tec has been caught telling a long list of lies designed to make it appear their locator actually works, while at the same time, they refuse to actually perform the blind testing they lied about.
Any arguments that there is electrical interference at a treasure show is a moot point, because the signal that they claimed was being sent to "excite the selected isotope" was discovered to be connected to a grounded wire, not to a wire with a signal from their circuitry. It does not take high logic to figure out H3Tec has no substantial supporting evidence to suggest their locator can locate anything, especially when it fails every time to locate things that are hidden by someone who is not associated with the manufacturer. The evidence they have turns out to be a pack of lies they posted on their website.
So you are not referring to Tim Williams? Why should we exclude him?
He was there with Carl-NC hiding silver for the H3Tec people to find.
You expect we will ignore the fact that H3Tec failed to find the coins he hid because you say we shouldn't include his testimony?
This is getting stupid.
No normal minded person will ignore evidence that could cost them $10,000+ to buy non-working treasure finders.
What next? ... Should we ignore all the lies that H3Tec got caught with because we haven't actually tried one of their locators?
The evidence of their lies is all over the internet. Read the links in my post to check it out....
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...147#post125147
I never said anything holier than you did, I only offered a second point of view for people who have not actually tried an H3Tec locator, but have noticed a long trail of lies coming from the manufacturer.
My idea is for people who noticed H3Tec lied about a high-tech isotope-exciting signal which was discovered to be a non-signal that was only a grounded wire.
My idea is for people who wonder why the owner of H3Tec lied in the Geotech forum, saying silver bars have different silver isotopes than are found in silver coins to explain why his locator doesn't work.
My idea is for people who wonder why H3Tec lied about their locator finding gold at the National Geographic presentation.
People can read your idea, or my alternate idea and choose which they think is more useful for their purposes.
If my words mean nothing to you, then why bother to make replies to them twice?
You could simply ignore my meaningless words.
Best wishes,
J_P