Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike(Mont)
I have to say I have a hard time believing anyone studied in electronics does not know about this. So either you are stupid or a bunch of liars. Either way it does not say much for any of you. I call this place a den or thieves but it could also be called a brood of vipers or snake den. Don't waste your time giving me a warning because I don't read your posts.
This technology has been around for over a hundred years and is referred to as ground radio.
Note it says low power. Yes, it requires a bigger antenna than a Molecular Frequency Discrimiinator (MFD) and a filtering system, but the human body has it's own very sensitive detection system known as the human energy field or what some call the aura. So go ahead and make your stupid remarks how it can't possibly work. I'll just sit back and laugh at how riduculously biased you are.
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.s...eers_deve.html |
ground radio ? yes , of course... but you must explain from WHERE arrives the radio signal and its frequency and modulation kind, cause most of LRL circuits are passive receiver devices and have no transmitter
also you have to explain what's the mixup of "aura" thing with that: ground radio it's a known fact and it's used in e.g. time signals in the LF band BUT when you ask people like Esteban or Morgan about if they are looking for time signals in LRL they do not say , the do not explain and you too
I remember that many times Esteban posted a picture with a drawing of an early fisher experiment on metal detecting, where a transmitter and a receiver where used, and the transmitter antenna aimed in a way that the buried target reflected then the incoming electromagnetic waves to the receiver BUT asked also in that case about the time signal stations he did not answer!
you know... we could also say here that you guys play with time signals and passive receivers LRLs work (
) detecting that incoming time signal LF waves reflected by the conductive buried target , but it's really that way that happens ?
don't you think that people with SOLID electronic and rf understanding can not even replicate these things but test them as expected and find these DON'T work as LRL people reported ?
so... who's the stupid here... ? who does belive in something that fails and don't work in practice or who can fully replicate such stuff, test , find that it doesn't work as reported and tell you without problems ?
think about
