Thread: CRYPTON MINI
View Single Post
  #68  
Old 10-23-2012, 11:15 PM
Morgan's Avatar
Morgan Morgan is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,629
Default CRYPTON versus PDK-2

Quote:
Originally Posted by ANDREAS View Post
Hi Morgan
you say
"..Crypton is a mass production of 60 units per month
So,you will tell us the performance of your POCKET crypton...."

If i understand well, you try to derating pocket? If i understand well, you mean if is mass production is not a fine LRL?
Listen to me my friend. For me only two machines per day is a very low production. I can draw again software CAD for three or four... machines per day, but i cannot. Do you know why? It's simple . I use only wood. Wood is very difficult for connection without screws and set-all without false and very long time use wood-glue. In practice i have not holes, places and handmade stage for small tips, but i have also strong work for finish a device.
For calibration a pocket , i need two hours. Long time for me.
For calibration a OBMD-1 i need three days
Difference between us is only two points.
1. You work all steps with handmade, i use basic steps laser-cutters and CNC. In this case , i can tell you pocket is a handmade machine, with all the advantages of technology to keep the same performance for all devices.
2. You work without lab , ofcourse without investing money in machinery.
I working with rather large investments. Ask how much cost a laser 180w with scheduled starting points and this is a small machine for me.
Believe me, you build only two PDK per months, but you are lucky-man because you have not investing
best regards


I see in your CRYPTON circuit diagram that you using the double O coils configuration,this is not new for me,i made many tests with PDK using this system ,see the pictures,however i use diferent coil arrangement in my PDK´s.
Maybe you right, if it can be proved in this forum that OBMD-1 or POCKET work as a Long Range Locator.



Name:  Kopyas? Crypton OBMD-1 Block diagram.jpg
Views: 12520
Size:  64.5 KB

Name:  04150001.JPG
Views: 13125
Size:  225.8 KB

Name:  IM000074.JPG
Views: 12061
Size:  94.3 KB
Reply With Quote