Here's the tipoff:
Here's the tipoff: it reads like well-known LRL MFD fraud, and they do nothing to explain what makes their "technology" something different from that. A classic example of the "read the advertisement!" principle.
For those who have a little more scientific background, there's another tipoff: their "explanation" of their unique "technology" is a non-explanation.
* * * * * *
In reading their website, I keep getting the feeling that they know H3Tec well and are borrowing heavily from that model. But doing it a lot slicker than Chuckie, his hokey amateurism surely must have worked against him trying to get contracts with professional clients.
Notice their "credentials"? Where's the references? It all looks like Chuckie being reworked by some slicker dudes.
Now, is it possible that they can actually pull this off and get away with it with professional clients who would have choked on Chuckie? I think maybe so. Since their actual methods for producing data output are "behind the curtain", they can use conventional methods to produce mineral maps that show agreement with known deposits. If they're actually skilled at this, they might even provide a useful service for some clients. If the client pays a whole lot more than is customary for such services because the client thinks some newfangled science magic went into it, so much the better.
If what they've got is actually for real, I encourage them to provide some evidence that backs up their claims. I'm not demanding that they prove their system works well, but if they expect to be taken for something other than frauds they need to offer a credible scientific basis for what they're doing.
--Dave J.
|