View Single Post
  #32  
Old 08-26-2014, 08:40 AM
leviterande leviterande is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 18
Default

Mike, and all the experts or non experts out there.
I know this is off topic but I feel some points are good to see.


1-NMR

2-Low energy level spectra or the hyper fine splitting of atoms

3- Halo, aura, ionic effects, special field(?) of old buried minerals

4- emission of rays/em waves special to each element.(can with great certainty say that this is real but not 100% yet. I found out the frequencies emitted, measured, and calculated from a source unrelated to treasure hunting or lrl )

(3 and 4 not yet verified if 100% real or not yet, specially nr 3(?))


For any kind of any LRL these are 4 point of concern.

We have solid basis which is 1 and 2 but it is not over yet. You need to mostly though think about the Penetrability and strength of signal .

Lets take a closer look

1-NMR in Earths magn. field is in the auditory range so penetration through ground is very good but the signals are truly weak. s/n would be very poor. But can we detect it still yet with sensitive equipment? another problem is that Earths field varies along the surface so the NMR will also vary but perhaps not too much over shorter but still relatively large distances.

2- Very Specific frequency or frequencies to each element coming from the very minute splitting of the first state energy level of the electron itself. Good thing is that the frequency is not variable and is always distinct and fixed to each element! Two bad things however: penetration may not be good since the frequencies usually lie in the microwave range. Still , detection should be done if the depth arent big in the good kind of soil.However, even if this penetration problem is passed, you have again the problem of the signal strength to noise ratio. How good is the signal? It is weak. but can we detect it with sensitive equipment? that is a very vital question. Nr 1 and 2 are real and is one possible path to LRL. Nr4 which I see is perhaps the only final method ,-if real of course-could depend only on the sensitivity of the equipment.

Regards
Karl
Reply With Quote