[moving]

Hi Mike, regarding your system, not for me to judge, and I sincerely believe that no one can do it, no one on this forum can 'evaluate or discredit faculty' intellectual result of a high sensitivity 'neurologica.Il human brain and' a cosmos unknown, who has a tendency rational intellectual, believes in the material, he relies blindly to electrical components and electronics-related chemical and then found as a baby without pacifier when the reaction of sensors designed circuits, do not meet their aspettative.Tutto this because ' the real problem is that you do not know the real nature of fenomeno.Cio 'that studies the phenomena, is called science, a scientist must not neglect any detail in order to know, to examine the phenomenon in nature and questione.La' selective , right 'like the one you exposed, and' rare but not impossible, I know someone who perceives water, some unconsciously reacting to earthquake swarms, ecc..sono unknown phenomena, how could we ever produce tools that give us feedback if we know nothing ? But if animals and plants could talk. With these lines, I do not want to discredit the technology, there is indeed a great help and there will be 'yet, but I can not stand those who burst of trial and simulations in the laboratory, promotes circuits for profit, I believe that this forum should understand the phenomenon together, throw no hook in the water and wait for the fish abocchi