Quote:
Originally Posted by goldfinder
Dowsing is a resonance (REZ) phenomena. Not in the sense of electrical REZ but in an act of personal resonance. Homeopathy fits into this category as medicine that has patterns that act to effect a change on the energy level. Magnetic fields will erase a pattern in a homeopathic as the pattern in fragile with respect to strong vortex of aetheric energy creating the magnetic field.
In a physical material like gold the pattern is strong and cannot be erased as it is cast in the physical level as well as other levels.
The dowser, because of his multi level nature. A good dower operates on several levels but gets his information on Aetheric side via tuning into patterns and the rays radiated to all similar patterns.
Goldfinder
|
Hummm what is the phenomena (REZ) Ideomotor or paranormal or parapsychology? you think is work with all? or 1/10000 peoples? let us think about it please.
Parapsychology is widely controversial in the scientific community and the "skeptics" (or France proponents of Zététique)
She first challenged because of its inability to prove beyond doubt the existence of its object of study (psi).
Then blame him too often the weakness of his experimental protocols and lack of rigor of parapsychologists, who fire hazardous conclusions from the results of experiments.
Another major criticism of parapsychology is that it has never managed to produce an experience that is replicable by all (the seeker is a believer or a skeptic) with consistent results.
Another common complaint is that it is a research area largely invaded by fraud, falsifying research results.
Also referred often skeptical in the literature of the "drawer effect", which is a publication bias. A researcher who tend to publish experiences with positive results but leave those with negative results "in the drawer of his desk," which gives a bad perception of the current state of research when reading the all of the published literature.
Finally, parapsychology is characterized by a very small number of researchers. When opening a review of parapsychology, the same names recur, number by number. This fact is not a good thing for a critical review articles: in fact, the small number of researchers publishing in parapsychology journals are also the same people who are part of the editorial boards of the journals.
Parapsychology is often referred to as pseudo-science for these reasons. His supporters regard it however as quite scientific. Indeed, it is sometimes argued that parapsychology studies phenomena which are only apparently inexplicable and if this discipline further examined the phenomena of interest, it would be able to reduce to known and accepted laws; but this is a disregard of the objectives of parapsychology, which does not so much seek to argue that the phenomena are inexplicable, so far recognized only to establish laws are sufficient or not to explain reality. Should the studies would lead to the conclusion that the accepted laws are not enough to explain a phenomenon, then parapsychology may contribute, within the limits of experimental science, to reveal the existence of an unknown law.
Another criticism directed at parapsychology is that it is not falsifiable. Parapsychology could defend this objection: it is true that some studies are poorly conducted, it is not impossible that some well-conducted experiments can demonstrate a statistically significant link, observable on the basis of repeated tests, between a gesture individual and a specific outcome (eg guessing the color of a card that was removed from the sight of a subject). By that parapsychology may seem falsifiable.