View Single Post
  #23  
Old 06-09-2006, 07:24 PM
hung's Avatar
hung hung is offline
Guru
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: In LRL Land
Posts: 1,582
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ebr_z2002
Who is that person to state that our website is "under suspicion" or something of the like? What is his authority to do that?
When I wrote are under suspicion is due to their meaningless production line.
you see in less than half year they have introduced various models.everyday one model.
an interesting aspect is when produce a new model tell it is the best, it is ..... all lies. the day after new introduced will be the best....
you see these results I selected from my archive.
object (Gold hair brooch)
1- MT2006 60% No electric net nearby ........................... 190.30 yds / 174 metros
2- DM42 50% No electric net nearby ........................... 158.60 yds / 145 metros
3- GDM428 70% No electric net nearby ........................... 222 yds / 203 metros
4- GDP538 100% No electric net nearby ........................... 317.10 yds / 290 metros
5- DC2006 Electric net nearby ............................... 185.90 yds / 170 metros
6- DC2008 No Electric net nearby ............................ 185.90 yds / 170 metros
compare models.think a little. if Gdp538 was 100% why produced another things? the newest model(Dc200strength is less than some old models !!!!!!!!!!!

Object Gold Ring with Diamond
The Directional MINEORO® research 5,4 more time!
Models FG78 and DC2006.It located the same ring at 8.858feet /2.70m or more depth.
Models FG78 and DC2006. It detected a ring at 21.87yds / 20m distance.
The Directional MINEORO® research 5,4 more time!
Models FG80/FG79 and DC2008. It located the same ring at 8.858feet /2.70m or more depth.
Models FG80/FG79 and DC2008. It detected a ring at 21.87yds / 20m distance.
Object Gold Mine. Weight The stone contains of ½ grams of gold
Model FG78. It located a gold stone at 3.937feet / 1.20m or more depth.
Model FG78. It detected a stone at 9.843yds / 9m distance.
Model FG80/FG79. It located a gold stone at 3.937feet / 1.20m or more depth.
Model FG80/FG79. It detected a stone at 9.843yds / 9m distance.
when compare see no difference between fg78,79,80.??!!!
and here;
Treasure: Gold 4,409lbs / 2.000kg.
- 2 Gold snakes statues...
- 2 Gold boxes...
DC2006 detected from 720m, fg78 from 800m, Dc2008 from 840m, fg79 from 1080m, fg80 from 1200m.
see a bold difference.they certainly tell cause is target size.

and this is the most ridiculous;
at same date distinctive targets detected by 2 different models;
Date 04/13/2006
Finding Gold ring with ruby Detector Metal detector - DC2006 Distance 65.62yds / 60m
Depth 27.56in / 70cm Weight 0.009921lb / 4,5g
Finding Silver coin - Carlos IV Detector Metal detector - DC2006 Distance 32.81yds / 30m Depth 19.69in / 50cm
Date 04/13/2006
Finding Gold ring with ruby Detector Metal detector - DC2007 Distance 65.62yds / 60m
Depth 27.56in / 70cm Weight 0.009921lb / 4,5g
Finding Silver coin - Carlos IV Detector Metal detector - DC2007 Distance 32.81yds / 30m Depth 19.69in / 50cm
when compare all above first thinking is all these models were produced at the same time.i.e no significant difference between
old and new models.i.e. when they had pdc205 had fg80 it is possible the box components in pdc205 is equal to fg80.
how they know it's gold hair brooch and at different times detected it by various models?!!wherease were able to detect
old buried targets!! and so for other objects were compared for other models.

They lying is clear but cannot tell a neat lie.
one day GDP538 is 10 times more sensitive than pdc210. after it DC 2006 more sensitive than GDP538.
and continues; DC2007, Dc2008, Fg78,79,89 and may be goes to.....FG8000. when really will finish?
Is here anybody have seen this speed of progress in specific technology or one company had this speed?(except to mineoro)
they have quized technology.
suppose their claims be right,why so much expensive?
one day they bought pdc210 4950 $ and now 9000$. it is really ridiculous.
Hey EZ,
I see you show up again. And now you sound upset.
Regarding your questions, you chose to answer them and you answered them wrong.
You claim Mineoro did not check your information, etc.
But you did not check their explanations upon the ionic phenomena, otherwise you would know the correct answers to your questions.

The reason the distance seem to dimish regarding the models specified is simply because the measurements were taken is different times of year and the ionic field in those times are greater or....lower in intensity. You will see that the new models actually detects longer than the previous ones.
The GDP measurement for instance was taken during summer in S. America.
Yes, you guesse. Ionic fields with high intensity allowing longer detection.
The DC2008 for instance was taken aftermarch with ionic fields low and humidity high.
So Mneoro's comparison charts were put absolutely correct and honest.

Now I have a question for you.
Why not taking your PDC210 to the field where according to Michael there's a true 'ElDorado' there insteda of wasting your time trying to 'catch' Mineoro?
Reply With Quote