Quote:
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Although I don't find most LRL's to be as they are advertised, I have experienced some sort reaction from most every LRL I have field tested.
|
Yes - a bad one - in the wallet.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Carl, on the other hand claims none of them work at all, at the same time other people experience success in their use. Certainly, any intelligent person should wonder why he would try to contridict fact?
|
Other people "think" they have achieved success in their use. That's a different thing altogether. Self delusion and objective reporting is not a result.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
This is not rocket science technology.
|
That's certainly true - it's not rocket science - it's pseudoscience.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Any idiot can take a few screws loose, open up an LRL, take a picture, and claim it can't possibly work. Even me. It requires no knowledge of the subject or field experience of any kind. Just an agenda.
|
That's also true, but in this case it's not the idiots who are taking them apart to expose a scam, it's the idiots who are building these devices in the first place.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Until Carl, conducts extensive field testing of the products he reports about, he is being dis-honest. Unfortunately, being untruthful is a habitual way of life for Carl. He appears unable to help himself.
|
Actually you have very recently been given the opportunity to prove Carl wrong, but you wimped out of attending "The Treasure Expo" in August.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Carl's, own ficticous claims ranks along side the ficticous, or exaggerated advertising claims made by some LRL manufacturers. Two wrongs don't make a right.
|
Aah! So which LRL claims are
not fictitious? Let me guess .... those of Dell Winders?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Yes, it would be nice if there was an unbiased, non-prejudiced scientist that was conducting actual field studies based on fact, and NOT on assumption, or using a cheap advertising gimmick challenge to promote themselves and their agenda.
|
All scientists are biased. That's why double blind testing is used extensively in real science, and not objective evidence and selective amnesia.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Regretably, there are no real Scientist conducting LRL studies. Only untruthful scientific Pretenders. Dell
|
Not any more. There are many reports on dowsing and LRLs which prove conclusively they do not work. Why would any real scientist want to carry out such a test? It certainly wouldn't be to enhance his reputation.
