Among other true statements here (made by all of you) i would like to
extract the most significant for this subject:
"...Lower noise the Electrometer the lower the detection level..."
Bravo JC1!!! Whole point made in few words !!! This is crucial to
understand if we want to continue disscusion! After this, nothing else
can aprove main LRL's thesis about blah,blah lr principles and simillar!
That's why i suggested to Geo, first to experiment a while with Zahori and
than to make some conclusions further.
If we (low budget mortals) cant get high-tech to experiment, at least we can
"simulate" expensive processes with what we have...few wires and nuts...Hah!

Carl:
"If the protection fuse has been blown (and I assume it surely has) then the
only way is to decap the part and re-deposit the fuse metal using a focused
ion beam (FIB) machine. I've used a FIB service in Raleigh several times,
but it's very expensive, and they might not agree to FIB a microcontroller fuse."

Dependable of uP type. Whether is capacitive,resistive or diode matrix fuses
inside.
Some russian freaks established other method. Cut (sand)
plastic top of ic to make safety approach and using microscope soldering extra
thin fiber in fuse place! What a freaks! But at the end it works!
Rate of success was 90:10...good enough!
But i do not see point to do that on mineoro "uPc"...It is not even uPc..it is
some nonsenced choosen ic to "play the uPc role" there. Wired in manner not to
produce shorts in circuitry..That is all!
I had chance to check mineoro. Experiment with it. Measure signals in all lines..
Nothing! Sound is produced according to hums and interferences received by
"direct" receiver in small black box...(Carl already disected it)..Funny!
Anyway, this forum deserves more detailed approach to some real technology, that's
why i salute your last posts here!
Very Best regards!