View Single Post
  #9  
Old 08-29-2007, 03:51 PM
Qiaozhi's Avatar
Qiaozhi Qiaozhi is offline
Guru (Administrator)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,650
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hung View Post
Hi.
This is not my return to the forum as I stand for what I claimed several weeks ago. I have nothing to gain here anymore. And everything to loose, specially my patience.
Welcome back ... I think.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hung
After being away for sometime, I started to read the messages and it’s clearly evident how pathetic is the temptative of some skeptics here of ‘imploring’ Esteban for his schematics.
It's Max that's doing the "imploring". IMHO the only LRL person I have respect for is Esteban. This is because he is a fellow experimenter. Whether he is self-deluded or not is irrelevant, and it's still interesting to understand what phenomenon he is detecting, if anything. Although I do not believe it is longtime buried gold, it would be good to know the real underlying cause.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
Besides this and the usual morons of the hour who insist in discrediting Mineoro (he,he,he,), ...
Actually there's no need to discredit Mineoro. Their own advertising does a good enough job by itself.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
I warned Esteban he had nothing to gain being here and displaying his *** to spanking , but he chooses to keep talking here and I respect that. Actually I think he’s having more fun here than ever now.
Perhaps Esteban enjoys a good spanking. Some people are like that!
Personally I hope that Esteban continues to post, even though Max's retorts can be somewhat annoying. (No offence intended Max, but you do need to give Esteban a break now and then.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
As stated previously, I’m in the final stages of having a LRL system fully working. It’s different from Esteban’s concept as I will detect gold long range, no matter if it’s long time buried, if it was buried 2 minutes ago or even if it’s not buried. The same goes for silver.
But also unlike him, I won’t be revealing a single word about it’s concept much less discussing its working principle.
Nothing new there then.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
Now returning to the subject, I never thought skeptics would show their desperation in getting their hands on a working LRL. Using every dirty tactic available. This is historic in my opinion.
Picture this… We and Esteban live in ‘third world’ countries as some sordidly refered in the past.
So how come we suceed? We should hot have the technology available, should we?
Sure we do. Alhtough we don’t have the US money, we have bright people in this side of the americas too, folks.
"... a working LRL." There's a novel concept.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
This forum has become a circus now.
You need to ask Max about that. (i.e. all the clown pictures.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
And besides the ocurrences described above, not much happening, and in fact if it wasn’t for Esteban here, remote sensing would be dead.
Good old Esteban.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
You know this, as you would be talking alone. Or, you would do like us and would get your asses out of the chair to research and build you own units. But this is another story, isn’t it?
This statement makes a huge assumption - that LRLs actually work. This is the reason for the discussions with Esteban. Since (in my mind) he is a credible experimenter, this is the only logical place to start any exploration of this claimed phenomenon. And - that's what it is - a claimed phenomenon, not a proved one. If you want to prove something to the skeptics then you need to post some real objective proof, not just subjective evidence. So far ... nothing. Hence the polite request for a schematic. Even one that is 15 years old. If you cannot supply any real proof, then further claims are pointless.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
Forum has become fun. I laughed a lot upon reading the latest messages. So even I can’t return now (to busy) I might post some sporadic messages in the future to join the fun here.
Many a true word is said in jest. The whole LRL subject is fun because it is a joke, unless you prove otherwise. This means you must submit to double-blind testing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
Beofre I go, I should point the only sad note is that I see one member here trying to discredit Dell Winders and his deivces. Don’t do this. Respect the work of a living of a fellow countryman.
I realise that some skeptics gets emotionally involved (as do some LRL proponents) and it ends up as a slanging match, but in general this forum is usually conducted in a polite manner. Unfortunately Dell is one of the emotional people, and threats to sue people in court tend not to go down very well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hung
Have a nice week.
And you ...
Reply With Quote