Welcome back ... I think.
It's Max that's doing the "imploring". IMHO the only LRL person I have respect for is Esteban. This is because he is a fellow experimenter. Whether he is self-deluded or not is irrelevant, and it's still interesting to understand what phenomenon he is detecting, if anything. Although I do not believe it is longtime buried gold, it would be good to know the real underlying cause.
Actually there's no need to discredit Mineoro. Their own advertising does a good enough job by itself.
Perhaps Esteban enjoys a good spanking. Some people are like that!
Personally I hope that Esteban continues to post, even though Max's retorts can be somewhat annoying. (No offence intended Max, but you
do need to give Esteban a break now and then.)
Nothing new there then.
"... a working LRL." There's a novel concept.
You need to ask Max about that. (i.e. all the clown pictures.)
Good old Esteban.
This statement makes a huge assumption - that LRLs actually work. This is the reason for the discussions with Esteban. Since (in my mind) he is a credible experimenter, this is the only logical place to start any exploration of this claimed phenomenon. And - that's what it is - a
claimed phenomenon, not a
proved one. If you want to prove something to the skeptics then you need to post some real objective proof, not just subjective evidence. So far ... nothing. Hence the polite request for a schematic. Even one that is 15 years old. If you cannot supply any real proof, then further claims are pointless.
Many a true word is said in jest. The whole LRL subject is fun because it
is a joke, unless you
prove otherwise. This means you must submit to double-blind testing.
I realise that some skeptics gets emotionally involved (as do some LRL proponents) and it ends up as a slanging match, but in general this forum is usually conducted in a polite manner. Unfortunately Dell is one of the emotional people, and threats to sue people in court tend not to go down very well.
And you ...
