Quote:
The term resonance was borrowed from real science/physics, and as was noted before, was attached to dowsing with frequency generators merely as an attempt to lend credibility -- where none actually exists.
Resonance is already clearly defined, as it applied to the science where it was borrowed. The addition of a frequency generator, to a dowsing rod, in no way causes there to be resonance between sought-after targets and the person doing the seeking (ie. dowsing).
Perhaps you meant to infer there was some type of "as yet undiscovered" sympathetic type of interaction between the target and the dowser; but it is confusing to label it with the term resonance, since that word already has a clear definition --and it doesn't apply in this instance.
Further, if you believe there is some kind of sympathetic interaction between a target and a dowser, you would need to provide significant evidence of such an interaction and it would need to be validated with ordinary conventional instrumentation (not just a dowsing gadget or a "strange feeling").
|
Poor, poor, delusional Sam,
I see you continue to demonstrate your ignorance of the subject{s) trying to save face by discrediting Mike, and Mental Dowsing, with fantasy falsehoods.
Shame on you trying to fool knowledgeable electronic people on this forum with pseudo Scientific BS.
Sorry to shatter your fantasy world, but my field use of fully electronic remote sensing recievers and frequency discrimination broadcasting for the past 28 years shows me, and anyone with credible experience in the subject(s) that you don't have a Scientific leg to stand on.
When will you ever get it through your head that "WHAT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE". Dell