Quote:
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Yes, in my opinion, and experience, LRL's can be made much better. Totally electronic and computerized. Most of the computer technology to accomplish this has been around since the 90's. Fully electronic versions have been around since 1980 that I am aware of. I have personally used a several of them.
Dell
|
Don't you ever get tired of spreading that same old tired BS?
If LRLs could be made totally electronic and computerized, they would have been many years ago.
There is just one thing that has all along kept that from happening. YOU CAN'T MIX PSEUDOSCIENCE WITH REAL SCIENCE AND EVER END UP WITH SOMETHING THAT IS REAL SCIENCE.
You, and others, have tacked on or attached your
receiver rods to multi-thousands of dollars worth of electronic gadgetry, lights, readouts and frequency generators. But not ONCE have you ever come up with a device that, in the end, was anything more than pure pseudoscience. Not once!
Qiaozhi, said it best for you; but I'm sure it went sailing right over your head:
How ever many times you multiply a number by zero, you will still get zero.
You, and others, have borrowed all the terms and technology labels you can think of, and applied them to your pseudoscientific receiver rods. All done, in the hope of lending some type of credibility to your pseudoscientific junk, which has ZERO credibility.
And why do you do this....? To fool some poor technically-challenged sap into thinking the electronics are actually doing something; when in fact, the device will work exactly the same whether or not the power switch is turned on.
You, Dell, are a scam artist of the worst kind. How you can sleep at night is beyond me.