Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve in MS
You miss a very important fact and that is standard metal detectors work 
no one would deny that. So what they can find or not find is no issue, everyone knows they have limited range, with LRL no limitation to range .
There is still no evidence whatsoever that LRL will work, only someones word. You already have Carl's challenge so there is no need for another one to be made up. If LRL is so personal that no proof needs to made to whether it works that is fine, it should be kept personal and not even mentioned publically , otherwise the burden of proof rests squarely on the shoulders of those who claim they work, no ? |
LRL has limitation in range.
Right! I know if somebody comprobe with his eyes in presence of witnesses, cameras, etc., at the end you don't assume that this work because you consider ignorance this possibility, so as you're doctorate in logic, well, you can't carry on your shoulders!!!
So, you're affraid because can collide with years of negations!!!