Quote:
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Sorry, that tired old rationale you use doesn't apply
In a court of law, the burden of proof is required to be shown by the person publicly making false, or libelous accusations against another. SHOW PROVE PROOFYOUR ALLEGATIONS. Dell
|
Yes, the rationale I stated does apply, but of course pure pseudoscience will never fit into real science and physics, so there is no point in real scientific investigators wasting their time pointing out the obvious. Especially since your mind is CLOSED to real science in the first place.
By the way, since all of the statements I've published about you, your cohorts or your LRL/MFD are true, there is NO Libel; hence no accusations. Merely facts and truth.
The only possible way you could make a case for libel is if you could prove LRL/MFD actually worked better than Chance guessing. And, you can't (or won't) do that, so..... case closed, end of story.