Quote:
Originally Posted by Esteban
I use voltage because during detection increases the voltage in the detector circuit. Also must be electromagnetic and RF associated, because many methods I used was positive in most or minus grade. And maybe has electrochemical component by the corrossion. But gold presents low or no presents corrossion, but I think a kind of electrical field. I think this acts as a battery in the soil.
You can check with a simple 100 microamp meter type "needle" in situ, well remarcable over big old targets.
|
Okay, I see why you refer to it as a voltage. The problem, for me and others, is that I have an education in electronics and physics, and when you use electrical terms that have definitions already defined in the sciences that I am familiar --then I try to apply the principles as I know them. This makes understanding your "theory" of what you believe is going on around metals in the ground, very confusing. I would like to understand your "theory" better, but it must be explained in new terms that are not related to known sciences --or with known terms that actually do apply.
It appears that perhaps what you believe is going on around buried metals is completely electrochemical in nature. If that is the case, then the air above the ground, where you are pointing your detectors, is not involved. Hence, there are no "voltages" to measure, or sense.