Quote:
Originally Posted by Dell Winders
Another reason why the Carl Morland, $25,000 publicity gimmick is an intentional deception... ??? Dell
|
Guess I don't follow your logic, Dell. Perhaps there isn't any logic to follow; rather just random words strung together to form more useless rhetoric.
One thing for sure is that any test designed by Carl will be according to DB protocol and as such would eliminate (to a strong degree) Chance Results from scoring a successful outcome.
Hmmmm... come to think about it, I suppose that would seem unfair to you and your do-nothing dowsing contraptions.
To win the prize, you and your gadgets would actually have to perform the "stated" or "implied" function/claim. I can see where you'd have a problem with that constraint.
