Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theseus
I think I understand your postings, J_P.
In regards to....
J_Player said; "Unknown to most skeptics, I have always maintained that gold corrodes, sending ions in the soil since my first posts in Geotech many years ago."
I am also of the opinion that noble metals enter into a kind of transfer with less noble metals, in a suitable electrolyte (perhaps like moist soil). The transfer is probably quite minute in strength and could involve ions, cations, etc. I do not, however, subscribe to the idea these charged particles somehow leave the confines of the electrolyte (soil) and congregate as a cloud or field above or adjacent to a deposit of noble metal. Hence, that leaves me extremely skeptical of any LRL device based on the detection of free floating ions.
Thus, my interest in seeing the videos from the Geo/Morgan test/demo.  |
Hahahaaaaaa...
Cloud of ions hovering conveniently in the air above treasure so any ion detector will locate buried metal? Anybody who believes this must be retarded. Forget that it has been proved repeatedly with drift tubes and other ion detectors that these don't exist --- common sense tells us that the slightest wind would blow any alleged "gold ion cloud" away from the treasure area.
I am impressed that Alonso and Damasio concluded there is a column of ions above long-time buried metals, because this has been confirmed by countless scientifically conducted tests. But I think they formed a wrong conclusion when they published that the column of gold ions continues 7.2 feet above the ground.
My speculation is they used instruments to measure electrical charge fields (or other fields) in the air, and found somewhat consistent readings when their instruments were pointed in a direction up to 7.2 feet above a buried treasure. I have no idea what they were actually measuring, but I can't believe it was a cloud of gold ions. There can be many secondary geophysical effects above buried metals that might be measurable with suitable instruments. Maybe they measured something and erroneously concluded it was the same gold ions they knew were in the soil. The question that remains in my mind is: If they did not detect gold ions, then what did they find that can be detected 7.2 feet above a long time buried metal object?
The most obvious answer that comes to mind is a complex chain of interdependent mechanisms which would cause a large anomaly in the atmospheric charge gradient above long time buried metals. But this answer depends on a lot of hypothetical conditions to be met, which have never been tested. So my answer is I don't know what they detected, only that they reported it continues 7.2 feet above the ground where a buried metal object is buried.
This is part of the reason why I like to see videos and live demonstrations of LRLs working. If there is an LRL that can be shown to work consistently, then it can be used as a test instrument to explore the strange findings posted on the Mineoro website, and will maybe uncover the mystery of what this 7.2 feet in the air detection is all about. Of course, maybe it will be found that there is nothing to be detected 7.2 feet above buried metal...
Best wishes,
J_P