![]() |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Hi Morgan,
Thanx for the answer. It is great that you have tested and selfmade such ionic detectors but there are some points generally very mysterious: @ "Mineoro FG79 Price?" in Post #7 from 2008 you've been totally against them: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...t=mineoro+fg79 Is this because those devices doesn't work outside of Brazil - not in equation with different ionic-fields or something? If so, is there a Mineoro Model that works everywhere and do you still have some to sell? Next: @ LRL Ionic/Electrostatic energy field locator Page 5 http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...t=14731&page=5 hung in post #116 wrote: Quote:
http://www.mineoro.com/goldDetectors/finding_mexico.php# that the PDC210 no longer is produced but replaced by the much more sensitive FG80. What does this mean? Was hung right with his test results or was it a lie and is the PDC210 better? @ "new mineoro video" hung also found a piece of copper-tube in an ancient city - post 7 - just from a month ago: http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showt...ht=copper+tube Again with the PDC210. I guess the PDC210 is much better because it also shows other metal-signals. As you said, large and long time ago buried gold is very seldom - perhaps 1 out of 500 places, so it's stupid focussing on gold only and frustrating alot customers that throw away there LRLs because they find nothing at all! I could built the ionic detector and because I found that LM324N opamp also the Gold Gun AL718 out of scratch with some mods and alot additional experimenting but when I read the info of "hung" and your formerly Mineoro statements I wonder what's really right or wrong now and why those devices should work under brazil conditions and not with european. btw. thanx for the nice pic - under what circumstances and from which distance did you found this cache? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|