rangertell examiner field trials

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by hung

Hey bigmouth, so there's indeed a diode as I had stated eh ??

I don't see a diode connected to the pot as you stated. I am reading the report where you made the claims you opened yours and took meter measurements inside.

I am wondering what readings you took inside where the diode is connected to the pot. I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside. It looks easy to take readings inside to me. Were you making up a story? Was this more fake testing you pretended to do? Is this why you had to wait until you found anther way to connect a meter without breaking the enclosure?
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=63618

Best wishes,
J_P

[hung]

Originally Posted by J_Player

I don't see a diode connected to the pot as you stated. I am reading the report where you made the claims you opened yours and took meter measurements inside.

I am wondering what readings you took inside where the diode is connected to the pot. I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside. It looks easy to take readings inside to me. Were you making up a story? Was this more fake testing you pretended to do? Is this why you had to wait until you found anther way to connect a meter without breaking the enclosure?
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?p=63618

Best wishes,
J_P

1 - In my model there's a diode conected to the pot. It requires 1 single neuron for a geek to figure there are several modifications employed along RT years. doohh!

2 - If I had not opened my examiner I would never be able to apply my mod.
In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

This case is closed to me. I will not waste my time beating your dead horse here.

Gotta go.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by hung

In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

.

Read first then accuse!

J_P clarify before photos:

"I received an email from Rangertell giving approval open this T-G version 8.08B Examiner and post photos of what I see inside.
I have no test data to show yet, but have fun seeing how the new ones look inside: "

But you have ethics to sell nonworking boxes to naive? Great ethics!

[J_Player]

Originally Posted by hung

1 - In my model there's a diode conected to the pot. It requires 1 single neuron for a geek to figure there are several modifications employed along RT years. doohh!

2 - If I had not opened my examiner I would never be able to apply my mod.
In my report I decided to not show the insides of the unit as I have ethics, unlike you who don't.

This case is closed to me. I will not waste my time beating your dead horse here.

Gotta go.

Hi hung.
There is no question of ethics in showing the inside of an Examiner. Rangertell sent an approval to show the photos you see above. They don't mind if you show photos of the inside and show what variances you measure on the meter readings you get. You realise of course many people don't believe you ever made meter readings inside your Examiner showing variances.

As far as the mod you claimed to make on your Examiner, you said the only mod you made was to stop the handle from swiveling. It is not necessary to open an Examiner to stop the handle from swiveling. But even if you opened it to stop the handle from swiveling or other mods, you still did not show any meter readings that indicate variances inside at the diode connected to the pot like you claimed you did.

I can see why you are anxious to close this matter.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Theseus]

Originally Posted by J_Player

Hi hung.
There is no question of ethics in showing the inside of an Examiner. Rangertell sent an approval to show the photos you see above. They don't mind if you show photos of the inside and show what variances you measure on the meter readings you get. You realise of course many people don't believe you ever made meter readings inside your Examiner showing variances.

As far as the mod you claimed to make on your Examiner, you said the only mod you made was to stop the handle from swiveling. It is not necessary to open an Examiner to stop the handle from swiveling. But even if you opened it to stop the handle from swiveling or other mods, you still did not show any meter readings that indicate variances inside at the diode connected to the pot like you claimed you did.

I can see why you are anxious to close this matter.

Best wishes,
J_P

It's the old "duck and cover" routine. Most all LRL aficionados have some sort of a run and hide plan in place when cornered with facts and truth they can't debunker.

[WM6]

Originally Posted by J_Player

I am wondering why we never saw any meter readings you allegedly took inside.

J_P

Measurement contact was done on brass rod from downside:

Such "phenomenon" can be measured inside buildings on all LC circuit, there do not need calculator to be present.

Are you open calculator too, to prove if some mod was done?