Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AV multiband VLF receiver

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by mustefa ubram View Post
    Not need more bands Treasure Hunt.
    We need a powerful transmitter and a wrist receiver that the transmitter.For example, if the transmitter sends a frequency 5 kHz The receiver will only receive 5 kHz frequency And not heard another noise.
    A Question:
    Can reveal whether the recipient New metal in the soil?
    I tell again one final time:

    This circuit is not designed to receive only one frequency with no noise.
    It is designed only for a toy to demonstrate the directional properties of the ferrite receiver.
    It is a very simple circuit which is not even worth the trouble to add a filter circuit.


    Filters are used for more sophisticated circuits.
    If you want to add a filter, you must first know what frequencies you want the filter to remove, and what exact frequencies you want the filter to allow to pass through so you can receive them.
    Since this is a multiband receiver, you cannot use a single filter.
    you must build at least 5 separate filters, one for each band.
    Then these filters must switch to a different filter when you change the position of SW2.
    But that is only for a simple filter at the preamp where you believe it is needed.
    You are wrong.
    You need more filtering than a simple filter at the preamp if you want to remove the noise from this circuit and receive a clear signal.
    You must add different filters at different stages to remove the noise signals you do not want.
    Also the amplifiers must be low-noise before you can hope to get a clear signal. These are simple signal transistors - not special low noise amplifiers!
    For proper filtering, each filter must be designed to remove a specific kind of noise at the different amplifier stages.
    Each of these filters is made with specially calculated component values to remove the frequency range which you want to remove.
    Also you must consider the antennas which you are using.
    With the design I see, the noise picked up from the magnetic antenna is several times more noise than an electric field antenna, simply because it is several times more sensitive than the electric field antenna at VLF frequencies.
    The filtering must be designed with this in mind.

    If you want the filter to allow only a narrow band to pass through when you tune to various different frequencies, then the filters become very expensive. And they cost more than all of the parts you see in this receiver. For this reason, you are better to begin with a good VLF receiver that was intended to receive a clear VLF signal instead of a toy circuit that was designed to experiment and learn about the directional properties of a ferrite antenna.

    If you think that you can make this toy receiver reject all noise and receive only the frequency which you want, by simply inserting a filter at the preamp, then you make a mistake.
    The idea to add a preamp filter and believe it will remove all the noise is a mistake.
    And it is a stupid way to waste time with electronic designing that is guaranteed to produce bad results.
    But if you really believe that inserting a preamp filter will make the noise stop in this simple receiver, then see the image below that you can put in the place where you think a filter is needed.
    Since you don't know any specific frequencies you want to remove, this is a simple low pass filter.
    I think it will not remove all noises and give a clear signal, but you can try it.

    A Question:
    Can reveal whether the recipient New metal in the soil?
    Answer: Geologists can find metal in the ground with a VLF receiver.
    They usually tune to a distant VLF transmitter maybe 1000 km distance or more.
    Sometimes they tune to a transmitter which they bring to the place where they want to search if there is no government transmitter sending a signal.
    Then they can locate a metal tank in the ground, or a car that is buried in the ground.
    They cannot locate a gold coin in the ground with their VLF receiver.

    Best Wishes,
    J_P
    Attached Files

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by J_Player View Post

      What do you think?
      Are we ready for a new circuit design?
      Agree with you.
      We are still in life and this fact promise new circuit design too.
      Global capital is ruining your life?
      You have right to self-defence!

      Comment


      • #93
        Originally posted by mustefa ubram View Post

        We need a powerful transmitter and a wrist receiver that the transmitter.For example, if the transmitter sends a frequency 5 kHz The receiver will only receive 5 kHz frequency And not heard another noise.
        A Question:
        Can reveal whether the recipient New metal in the soil?
        You do not need powerful TX (no benefit from power here), but you need good sine wave TX and noise will not be big problem.

        As J_P explain this receiver is designed to experiment and play around with directive (ferrite antenna) receiver.

        There are theoretical possibilities to detect reflected wave from very big metal surfaces no matter if it is New metal or Old metal.

        But you do not expect to detect on remote small targets as one coin alone (buried or in air). Such intention already encroaches sphere of dowsing and not simple electronic design like this.
        Global capital is ruining your life?
        You have right to self-defence!

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by WM6 View Post
          You do not need powerful TX (no benefit from power here), but you need good sine wave TX and noise will not be big problem.

          As J_P explain this receiver is designed to experiment and play around with directive (ferrite antenna) receiver.

          There are theoretical possibilities to detect reflected wave from very big metal surfaces no matter if it is New metal or Old metal.

          But you do not expect to detect on remote small targets as one coin alone (buried or in air). Such intention already encroaches sphere of dowsing and not simple electronic design like this.
          When a geologist detects metal in the ground, he is measuring the magnetic properties of the ground. It is the same as using a VLF metal detector to measure the magnetic properties of the ground. But the geologist will use the VLF waves in a different way than a treasure hunter uses on his VLF detector. A treasure hunter will take measures to remove the effects of ground mineralization and look only for metal things which are in the near proximity of his transmitter. For a geologist, he is looking for ground mineralization, so he does not cancel it. He moves the RX loop to make a survey of all the ground, and he records his readings. This can tell him how the ground mineralization changes at different parts of the land. His VLF receiver antenna will certainly tell him if he finds a buried metal tank or car, because he is measuring the induced magnetic field which the transmitter induces in conductive ground below the surface. A buried metal tank or car will show an anomaly because it is more conductive than the surrounding ground. For the geologist, the buried metal trash is considered noise which he ignores when trying to determine what rock formations are under the ground. The things which the geologist is finding are conductive soils, which give a stronger signal, and especially soils which have magnetite or hematite deposits, and other mineralized rocks.

          For treasure hunting, the geologist methods can help to locate ore deposits, but not small metal objects.
          The treasure hunting techniques for long range VLF detecting require building simple VLF transmitters and receivers, then performing secret tuning to find the elusive treasure signal.
          Since these are secret tuning methods, and the treasure signal is also a secret, no geologist or engineer knows anything about the secret gold signal or methods to tune a simple VLF transmitter and receiver to find a gold signal.
          You must contact a builder of secret treasure finding locators if you want to know the secret of tuning a VLF transmitter and receiver to find the secret gold signal.
          Morgan and Geo are the only people who I see posting in the forum that their secret gold-finding treasure locators are really working, and Morgan is even showing photos of the treasure they find.
          You must ask Morgan or Geo how to build your VLF transmitter and receiver to find the elusive gold signal.
          They are nice people. I am sure they will help you to build a VLF transmitter and receiver that really works to find treasure for you.


          Best Wishes,
          J_P

          Comment


          • #95
            Hi All
            no necessity of VLF trasmitter, the trasmitter kills the phenomenon but non the compass\sky effect. A simple RF amplifier in self oscillating mode it can sense the phenomenon, but to do a stable oscillating amplifier it's difficult, you must have a no saturated output.

            Best Regards

            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
              Hi All
              no necessity of VLF trasmitter, the trasmitter kills the phenomenon but non the compass\sky effect. A simple RF amplifier in self oscillating mode it can sense the phenomenon, but to do a stable oscillating amplifier it's difficult, you must have a no saturated output.

              Best Regards
              Hi FrancoItaly,
              What phenomenon does the transmitter kill?


              Best Wishes,
              J_P

              Comment


              • #97
                Hi J _P

                Long time buried metals emit something that's perturbs the E-field or the B-field of the earth, this is the "phenomenon".

                Best Regards

                Comment


                • #98
                  tank you wm6 j-p and other
                  What solution do you recommendFor smaller objects ?
                  Knowledge is the greatest wealth

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by mustefa ubram View Post

                    What solution do you recommend For smaller objects ?
                    Regular metal detector for now.

                    What of use, if you can "locate small targets kilometres away" by using LRL, if, at the end of the day, you need a metal detector to prove, when you locate something or not?

                    And digging holes till 50cm of depth using MD can be far enough for recreational purposes.
                    Global capital is ruining your life?
                    You have right to self-defence!

                    Comment


                    • A circuit for detecting electromagnetic:
                      Attached Files
                      Knowledge is the greatest wealth

                      Comment


                      • hello ts
                        antenna=? (how many turns (Approximately ))
                        sorry i have no L meter

                        thanks and regards

                        Comment


                        • Correction circuit WITH 3914
                          Attached Files
                          Knowledge is the greatest wealth

                          Comment


                          • WM6 great master help me?
                            This large square coil circuit instead of 5 khz alıcı.Ben ferrite rod diameter of 1 cm length 20 cm
                            use wire diameter and number of turns of the coil wound on the rod lazım.Ferrite how should it be?
                            Thank you.

                            http://k1306.hizliresim.com/1b/u/pm3y5.jpg

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by iron1944 View Post
                              WM6 great master help me?
                              This large square coil circuit instead of 5 khz alıcı.Ben ferrite rod diameter of 1 cm length 20 cm
                              use wire diameter and number of turns of the coil wound on the rod lazım.Ferrite how should it be?
                              Thank you.

                              http://k1306.hizliresim.com/1b/u/pm3y5.jpg
                              It depend of ferrite rod characteristics which are not known..

                              You can use the same wire diameter. First wind 50 testing turns on your ferrite rod and measure inductance. Out of this you can calculate total inductance bzw. number of turns.

                              For 5kHz preference:

                              your coil inductance have to be 1mH

                              and C1 1uF (instead of 0.02uF as on schematic).
                              Global capital is ruining your life?
                              You have right to self-defence!

                              Comment


                              • Help PI detector project, 50X50cm can detect 5m, with 1x1m coil, which help me? Discrimination is not required,

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X