Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

help me - help me

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ma330
    replied
    Originally posted by J_Player View Post
    Hi Fred,
    I have no idea what this locator can detect or not detect other than the reports I read.
    If I become a famous Prophet/God/ saint/guru, then I will change my name like mesy64 does so nobody will know who I am.
    I do not need for people to pray to me.

    But what about treasure recovery?
    There are 40 years history of people recovering treasures when they used this buried metal locator.
    I know it will locate treasures from the reports I read.
    I have never read any report that it failed to locate a treasure when it was used as the manufacturer recommended.
    However, the manufacturer never recommended to configure this locator into a pistol design.
    So we hear other reports from people who made modifications to make it into the pistol shape, and even made modifications to the circuits.
    Then we hear many stories of locating long distances.
    But even the original factory "rifle configuration" was reported to find signals that modern metal locators do not detect.
    Where these signals come from, nobody knows for certain.

    We must keep in mind that when this locator began finding all these treasures was a time when most treasures had not been recovered yet, so there were more treasures to find.
    But after 40 years of metal detectors and other treasure hunting tools, I expect there are fewer treasures to find today.

    What is the longest distance of detection?
    Second, I do not know the exact distance that this locator can locate treasures.
    For pinpointing, I read the report that it can pinpoint farther than most pin-pointers... 45 cm for a coke can is farther than any other pin-pointer that I know of, and it will pinpoint the location of the can with accuracy of maybe 5cm or closer to the correct place to dig the hole.
    But for long range, I do not know exactly how far, because people have not made any reports to tell how far when the circuit is unmodified.
    This is the reason why I would like to see the field reports from people who actually test it like we read from sakis1.
    I think the distance of detection will depend on some details of how it is constructed.
    If a builder is careful to take precautions in the construction to avoid transferring the electronic noise from the speaker to the receiver circuit, and makes a very clean null with little metal near the coils, I think he will find better detection of small signals than a different builder who has loose wires bouncing around near the coils, and has metal brackets and screws at the coils.

    Third, I am wondering what modifications are necessary to find the long range detection of treasure metals such as gold, platinum, and silver, while ignoring aluminium and lead.
    We know from previous reports that it already have some discrimination built in that can be heard as a changed sound on the speaker for different metals.
    But I don't know for certain until we see some reports to confirm this.

    Detecting sparks from long range:
    From what I read, this locator will detect sparks from distant thunderstorms farther than an ordinary metal detector.
    We can expect this because it does not have a Faraday shield to block the detection of electric field anomalies.
    So we also know it does not intentionally block out the electric component of the VLF reception.

    I remember reading reports of it making detection of signals when the closest thunderstorms were hundreds of Km distance.
    I am wondering if this locator is detecting the lightning flashes from their disturbance to the ground that could possibly be detected because of the transmission through the telluric currents under the ground.
    These are normally very slow fluctuating currents which appear to be DC, unless you look for long enough to see they are AC with a 24 hour cycle, and other lower frequencies superimposed, as well as higher frequencies as we see originating from lightning storms that could be very far distance.

    Then what about signals that come from treasures?
    As far as I know, treasures do not generate their own signals.
    An external source of energy must interact with the location of buried metals to cause an anomaly that could be detected.
    This is the principle of all treasure locators, with the exception of a special kind of gamma ray detector, which can detect gamma emissions that originate directly from various elements that are buried.
    The external energy which could conceivably show an anomaly at the location of buried metals comes from several sources:
    1. The VLF transmitter sends VLF waves that we can expect to penetrate at least 2-3 meters into the ground, and farther depending on the soil conductivity.
    2. Chemical energy from chemicals in the ground which corrode small amounts of all metals including gold and platinum, and make them into ions that are suspended into the ground around the buried treasure. This chemical action uses energy which is derived from transfers of the electric charges in the chemical bonds between elements which are combining and separating.
    3. The charge from the atmosphere imposes a strong electric field to the surface interface of the of the ground which surrounds the buried metal.
    4. Various electric currents under the ground such as telluric currents, momentary jolts of current from distant thunderstorms, current fluctuations cause by seismic activity, ground battery current from corrosion of metal or other nearby elements oxidising or reducing, 50-60Hz ground currents from nearby power generation and ground rods, etc. are more external energy sources which can find anomalies when a buried metal object is in the ground.
    5. Nuclear decay and collisions from other elements under the ground can impart energy to the buried metal, or to the chemically charged ground around it that may show an anomaly in the location of the buried metal.
    6. Effects of cosmic rays and other energies acting on the buried metals that are not well understood by most treasure hunters are another source of external energy impinging on the ground at the buried metal location.

    There are many other external sources of energy which could disturb the buried metal or the soil around it which could be charged with corroding ions from the metal.
    So we have a lot of choices for what kind of energy anomaly to look for in the vicinity of the treasure.
    Of course, the most obvious external source of external energy is the VLF transmitter you are waving toward the location where you want to look for buried metals.
    In normal metal detecting, we expect the energy from the magnetic component of the VLF will induce currents in the buried metal which will result in an anomaly that can be detected from the RX coil.
    But this only works for short ranges.
    The difference with this locator is it is not limited to receiving the magnetic component of the VLF that the transmitter sends out.
    It also can receive the electric field component.
    And from the reports I have read, it receives electric signals from other sources as well as the locked frequency of the transmitter.

    While this kind of reception is usually considered to be noise, who knows which of the external energies that are impinging on the buried treasure can be detected as an anomaly by the RX coil?
    It could be detecting any one of the 6 kinds of external energy I listed above, or others that I have not listed.
    How can we know what kind of an anomaly near the treasure would possibly be detectable by a locator that is so sensitive that it catches tiny noises that are usually filtered away by modern metal detectors?

    As near as I can remember, the engineer who adapted his original factory version of this locator reported detecting some very strange sounds that he could not identify from any particular source.
    But that's not all.
    Apparently, this same engineer converted at least one other metal locator to a PD configuration which used a similar electronic design from a different manufacturer and found the same kind of strange signals being detected that his other treasure hunting equipment could not locate.
    When engineers find this condition, they often think they have detected noise. And indeed they have!
    But it seems so strange that we heard no more about the strange signals he detected, and soon nothing more about his PD modified locator.
    This is why I think he went treasure hunting.
    Did he figure out where these signals came from?
    How much treasure did he recover over the years since I saw his last posts about these PDs that he constructed?
    Did he make modifications to his original factory circuits to tune in the treasures with more accuracy and more distance?

    Perhaps we will never know.
    But we now have the exact same circuit that he started with.
    So we can discover for ourselves what this locator can do and we can make our own modifications like sakis1 did.


    Best wishes,
    J_P
    j-p tank you for Submit Information

    Leave a comment:


  • ma330
    replied
    Originally posted by WM6 View Post
    Hi ma330, please, left some gold to me too!
    for dera freand wm6
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • J_Player
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred View Post
    At this speed of progress in a few days we will have pictures of treasures everywhere.
    And JP will be a worldwide known Prophet/God/ saint/guru (your choice)


    Originally posted by ma330
    Your believe.What is the power of detection in this pd?
    Hi Fred,
    I have no idea what this locator can detect or not detect other than the reports I read.
    If I become a famous Prophet/God/ saint/guru, then I will change my name like mesy64 does so nobody will know who I am.
    I do not need for people to pray to me.

    But what about treasure recovery?
    There are 40 years history of people recovering treasures when they used this buried metal locator.
    I know it will locate treasures from the reports I read.
    I have never read any report that it failed to locate a treasure when it was used as the manufacturer recommended.
    However, the manufacturer never recommended to configure this locator into a pistol design.
    So we hear other reports from people who made modifications to make it into the pistol shape, and even made modifications to the circuits.
    Then we hear many stories of locating long distances.
    But even the original factory "rifle configuration" was reported to find signals that modern metal locators do not detect.
    Where these signals come from, nobody knows for certain.

    We must keep in mind that when this locator began finding all these treasures was a time when most treasures had not been recovered yet, so there were more treasures to find.
    But after 40 years of metal detectors and other treasure hunting tools, I expect there are fewer treasures to find today.

    What is the longest distance of detection?
    Second, I do not know the exact distance that this locator can locate treasures.
    For pinpointing, I read the report that it can pinpoint farther than most pin-pointers... 45 cm for a coke can is farther than any other pin-pointer that I know of, and it will pinpoint the location of the can with accuracy of maybe 5cm or closer to the correct place to dig the hole.
    But for long range, I do not know exactly how far, because people have not made any reports to tell how far when the circuit is unmodified.
    This is the reason why I would like to see the field reports from people who actually test it like we read from sakis1.
    I think the distance of detection will depend on some details of how it is constructed.
    If a builder is careful to take precautions in the construction to avoid transferring the electronic noise from the speaker to the receiver circuit, and makes a very clean null with little metal near the coils, I think he will find better detection of small signals than a different builder who has loose wires bouncing around near the coils, and has metal brackets and screws at the coils.

    Third, I am wondering what modifications are necessary to find the long range detection of treasure metals such as gold, platinum, and silver, while ignoring aluminium and lead.
    We know from previous reports that it already have some discrimination built in that can be heard as a changed sound on the speaker for different metals.
    But I don't know for certain until we see some reports to confirm this.

    Detecting sparks from long range:
    From what I read, this locator will detect sparks from distant thunderstorms farther than an ordinary metal detector.
    We can expect this because it does not have a Faraday shield to block the detection of electric field anomalies.
    So we also know it does not intentionally block out the electric component of the VLF reception.

    I remember reading reports of it making detection of signals when the closest thunderstorms were hundreds of Km distance.
    I am wondering if this locator is detecting the lightning flashes from their disturbance to the ground that could possibly be detected because of the transmission through the telluric currents under the ground.
    These are normally very slow fluctuating currents which appear to be DC, unless you look for long enough to see they are AC with a 24 hour cycle, and other lower frequencies superimposed, as well as higher frequencies as we see originating from lightning storms that could be very far distance.

    Then what about signals that come from treasures?
    As far as I know, treasures do not generate their own signals.
    An external source of energy must interact with the location of buried metals to cause an anomaly that could be detected.
    This is the principle of all treasure locators, with the exception of a special kind of gamma ray detector, which can detect gamma emissions that originate directly from various elements that are buried.
    The external energy which could conceivably show an anomaly at the location of buried metals comes from several sources:
    1. The VLF transmitter sends VLF waves that we can expect to penetrate at least 2-3 meters into the ground, and farther depending on the soil conductivity.
    2. Chemical energy from chemicals in the ground which corrode small amounts of all metals including gold and platinum, and make them into ions that are suspended into the ground around the buried treasure. This chemical action uses energy which is derived from transfers of the electric charges in the chemical bonds between elements which are combining and separating.
    3. The charge from the atmosphere imposes a strong electric field to the surface interface of the of the ground which surrounds the buried metal.
    4. Various electric currents under the ground such as telluric currents, momentary jolts of current from distant thunderstorms, current fluctuations cause by seismic activity, ground battery current from corrosion of metal or other nearby elements oxidising or reducing, 50-60Hz ground currents from nearby power generation and ground rods, etc. are more external energy sources which can find anomalies when a buried metal object is in the ground.
    5. Nuclear decay and collisions from other elements under the ground can impart energy to the buried metal, or to the chemically charged ground around it that may show an anomaly in the location of the buried metal.
    6. Effects of cosmic rays and other energies acting on the buried metals that are not well understood by most treasure hunters are another source of external energy impinging on the ground at the buried metal location.

    There are many other external sources of energy which could disturb the buried metal or the soil around it which could be charged with corroding ions from the metal.
    So we have a lot of choices for what kind of energy anomaly to look for in the vicinity of the treasure.
    Of course, the most obvious external source of external energy is the VLF transmitter you are waving toward the location where you want to look for buried metals.
    In normal metal detecting, we expect the energy from the magnetic component of the VLF will induce currents in the buried metal which will result in an anomaly that can be detected from the RX coil.
    But this only works for short ranges.
    The difference with this locator is it is not limited to receiving the magnetic component of the VLF that the transmitter sends out.
    It also can receive the electric field component.
    And from the reports I have read, it receives electric signals from other sources as well as the locked frequency of the transmitter.

    While this kind of reception is usually considered to be noise, who knows which of the external energies that are impinging on the buried treasure can be detected as an anomaly by the RX coil?
    It could be detecting any one of the 6 kinds of external energy I listed above, or others that I have not listed.
    How can we know what kind of an anomaly near the treasure would possibly be detectable by a locator that is so sensitive that it catches tiny noises that are usually filtered away by modern metal detectors?

    As near as I can remember, the engineer who adapted his original factory version of this locator reported detecting some very strange signals that he could not identify from any particular source.
    But that's not all.
    Apparently, this same engineer converted at least one other metal locator to a PD configuration which used a similar electronic design from a different manufacturer and found the same kind of strange signals being detected that his other treasure hunting equipment could not locate.
    When engineers find this condition, they often think they have detected noise. And indeed they have!
    But it seems so strange that we heard no more about the strange signals he detected, and soon nothing more about his PD modified locator.
    This is why I think he went treasure hunting.
    Did he figure out where these signals came from?
    How much treasure did he recover over the years since I saw his last posts about these PDs that he constructed?
    Did he make modifications to his original factory circuits to tune in the treasures with more accuracy and more distance?

    Perhaps we will never know.
    But we now have the exact same circuit that he started with.
    So we can discover for ourselves what this locator can do and we can make our own modifications like sakis1 did.


    Best wishes,
    J_P

    Leave a comment:


  • J_Player
    replied
    More information for the metal locating PD:

    I checked an old computer hard drive and found more notes I made from the old forum posts describing this PD adaptation of the original factory locator.
    You can see there are some corrections I found.
    You can use some of these infos to check if your version is working the same as the original factory version.

    1. The 50K sensitivity pot is multi-turn. This will give better control for making fine adjustments to the sensitivity.

    2. If you measure the voltage across the ends of the TX coil (same as across the 3.3nF mica capacitor), you will find a maximum peak voltage of 180v. This means you want to use a real mica capacitor that will not have a problem with 180v. This coil measured at 759uH, about 4 ohms. The TX wire size had the appearance of being 0.45mm diameter (AWG 25).

    3. The TX coil oscillator has a pulsed frequency that repeats 333 pulses per second. Each of these pulses sends a burst of VLF frequency which decays logarithmically to nothing within 0.6 ms (this is about 1/5 of the time between pulses). This series of pulses is generated at the first transistors which form a relaxation oscillator connected to the TX coil at the tap between the 12T and 3T windings. Your version pistol locator vary a little depending on the exact values and tolerances of the coil and capacitor that you use for the TX, and the pulse rate could vary depending on the tolerances of the components around the first two transistors. [Note: I suspect there may be an error reading the pulses per second. It may be 667 pulses per second if I did not read my notes correctly.]

    4. The RX coil voltage measured across the ends (same as measure across 1.8nF capacitor) is 400 mv from peak to peak. This coil measured 4.166mH at 21.2 ohms.
    The RX wire size had the appearance of being 0.25mm diameter (AWG 30).

    5. Initial pinpointing distance tests in air:
    45 cm = coke can
    14 cm = aluminium sheet 14cm x 9cm
    1.2 m = other large metal objects

    No problem pinpointing to find the correct place to dig a hole
    Discriminates from ferrous to non-ferrous
    Detected the engineer's hand when he moved it close to the coil.

    I assume the discrimination accomplished by the tone that is heard on the speaker.
    This would mean there is a difference in phase angle of the received signal depending on whether we are detecting a ferrous or non-ferrous metal anomaly, and this phase angle variation is preserved so it can be heard through the audio amplifier.

    The corrections I show above will be included in the final compilation for this project.
    Remember to make changes to for building from previous posts above.


    Best wishes,
    J_P

    Leave a comment:


  • J_Player
    replied
    Originally posted by WM6 View Post
    Hi ma330, please, left some gold to me too!
    Hi WM6,
    You can gold-plate the board, then you will have a built-in sample with many ground currents flowing through it.


    Best wishes,
    J_P

    Leave a comment:


  • WM6
    replied
    Originally posted by ma330 View Post
    my pcb is Ready
    Hi ma330, please, left some gold to me too!

    Leave a comment:


  • ma330
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred View Post
    Rotate or not rotate, that is the question.
    Good luck to you too !
    dear fred
    I had seen none of the transistors.I just put them in the replica in pcb.And did not specify the base and collector base and emitter of the transistor Because users are free to place transistors.
    good luck

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred
    replied
    Rotate or not rotate, that is the question.
    Good luck to you too !
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ma330
    replied
    Originally posted by Fred View Post
    I may be wrong but it seems you have reversed it.For your luck there are no IC´s, but you will need to rotate all the transistors 180º.
    no dear fred
    Everything is correct.No need to rotate any part. When comes back everything will be in place.I've developed a very PCb with this software.All of them are working.
    good luck

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred
    replied
    Originally posted by ma330 View Post
    my pcb is Ready
    I may be wrong but it seems you have reversed it.For your luck there are no IC´s, but you will need to rotate all the transistors 180º.

    Leave a comment:


  • ma330
    replied
    my pcb is Ready
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • ma330
    replied
    Your believe.What is the power of detection in this pd?

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred
    replied
    At this speed of progress in a few days we will have pictures of treasures everywhere.
    And JP will be a worldwide known Prophet/God/ saint/guru (your choice)

    Leave a comment:


  • aft_72005
    replied
    Originally posted by J_Player View Post
    Hi aft_72005,
    Yes, I know that Iran has a long and rich history.
    This was the ancient Persia which was much larger than Iran today.
    For mest64, I agree with you.
    There is no reason why anyone should use fake names unless they have some secret mission.
    For me, I want no part of any of the mesy64 or other fake names from mesyana.
    I think it is good to ignore all attempts from mesy64 to beg for circuits.
    This forum is for people who want to experiment with LRL principles, not for fake names to come and continue to ask for more circuits.

    Thank you for your help with some good engineering in other threads.

    Best wishes,
    J_P

    Hi J_Player
    Also I am thank you, you are smart engineer, I reading all your messages in forum .
    You having strong theory.
    Best regards.

    Leave a comment:


  • mehdi
    replied
    i checked it and i can say it has not any problem.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X