Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lrl from Italy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by edward View Post
    Hi mr franco and thank you for your help

    I tested bc548, bc547 b , bc 238b , bc 547c , and the results was same, my pcb is self oscillation, i have to use 20 pf capacitors for c13 , c14 to avoid from self oscilation
    I think when i increase total value of c2 , c3 , c4 for increasing output voltage the lrl sensivity decreases


    Now i have 2 question mr franco
    1- how much is maximum amount that can be used for r10 and r12
    2- does your lrl dont work with low voltage in output? ( for example 0.5 volts or 0.6 volts)
    Hi mr franco

    There is something interesting

    When i use switching power supply the output voltage increases from 3 volts to 6 volts( without quartz)
    I think this is because of long wire of switching power supply
    The last test was with 2× 9 volts battery
    I think self ocsilating has another reason
    Before that i made your lrl sensor with your pcb layout and the results was same i had 3 volts in output without quartz
    Both pcb was double side
    What about the tr4 collector? how much should this voltage be?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
      1 -Usually it is chosen for R10 / R12 a value lower than that of R9 / R13. I made several copies of my lrl and I always managed to eliminate self oscillation. Try to remove C13 / C14, in this way it should stop oscillating, if so, decrease R10 / R12 until it oscillates again, then increase again R10 / R12 until the oscillations cease. For example R10 / R12 = 1 K no oscillations, R10 / R12 = 680 ohms no oscillations ... R10 / R12 = 220 ohms no oscillations, R10 / R12 = 100 ohms yes oscillations, choose R10 / R12 = 220 ohms. This difficulty in eliminating self oscillations makes me think of a defect in the pcb, there may be some parasitic coupling. I always recommend using a double-sided pcb.
      2 - my lrl works also with low voltage output but for me it's better at least 2V, in fact it could happen when the installation was completed or in the field that the tension lowered further, in this way it would also greatly reduce the sensitivity, since it could not regulate the threshold effectively.
      I removed c13 , c14 and i had 6 volts in output without quartz
      R10 , R12 was 1 k resistors i chenged these with 2× 5k potentiometers and i started to increasing the potentiometers in 4k for both output voltage were 0 volt

      I have 8 volts in tr4 collector

      Comment


      • Originally posted by edward View Post
        I removed c13 , c14 and i had 6 volts in output without quartz
        R10 , R12 was 1 k resistors i chenged these with 2× 5k potentiometers and i started to increasing the potentiometers in 4k for both output voltage were 0 volt

        I have 8 volts in tr4 collector
        Well, 6V in output it's ok. The only unknown is if the gain is sufficient, however the further gain of the antenna amplifier should compensate.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
          1 -Usually it is chosen for R10 / R12 a value lower than that of R9 / R13. I made several copies of my lrl and I always managed to eliminate self oscillation. Try to remove C13 / C14, in this way it should stop oscillating, if so, decrease R10 / R12 until it oscillates again, then increase again R10 / R12 until the oscillations cease. For example R10 / R12 = 1 K no oscillations, R10 / R12 = 680 ohms no oscillations ... R10 / R12 = 220 ohms no oscillations, R10 / R12 = 100 ohms yes oscillations, choose R10 / R12 = 220 ohms. This difficulty in eliminating self oscillations makes me think of a defect in the pcb, there may be some parasitic coupling. I always recommend using a double-sided pcb.
          2 - my lrl works also with low voltage output but for me it's better at least 2V, in fact it could happen when the installation was completed or in the field that the tension lowered further, in this way it would also greatly reduce the sensitivity, since it could not regulate the threshold effectively.
          I conected the quartz and out put voltage is 0 volt

          C13 , c14 removed
          R10 , r12 4 kilo ohm
          Quartz connected output voltage is 0 volt
          Quartz disconnected out put voltage is 0 volt
          Tr1 emitter frequency is 8 mega heartz
          Tr4 collector voltage is 8 volt

          And I am tired

          Comment


          • Originally posted by edward View Post
            Hi mr franco

            There is something interesting

            When i use a the output voltage increases from 3 volts to 6 volts( without quartz)
            I think this is because of long wire of switching power supply
            The last test was with 2× 9 volts battery
            I think self ocsilating has another reason
            Before that i made your lrl sensor with your pcb layout and the results was same i had 3 volts in output without quartz
            Both pcb was double side
            What about the tr4 collector? how much should this voltage be?
            switching power supply is not recommended. May be in the laboratory there are other forms of disturbance, you have to try outside with battery power. It is not possible to measure the signal on the collector of TR4 with an oscilloscope because the signal disappears, the DC output measurement is sufficient. Also try to keep the antenna very short, 10 -15cm, inside the laboratory.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by edward View Post
              I conected the quartz and out put voltage is 0 volt

              C13 , c14 removed
              R10 , r12 4 kilo ohm
              Quartz connected output voltage is 0 volt
              Quartz disconnected out put voltage is 0 volt
              Tr1 emitter frequency is 8 mega heartz
              Tr4 collector voltage is 8 volt

              And I am tired
              DC voltage of TR4 collector must be about 5-6V but with R10=1K, by changing R10 also collector voltage changes. You have =0V with quartz because the gain is very poor, try C2 only (disconnect C3/C4) you have 1pF, if you have no result try 2pf or more.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                switching power supply is not recommended. May be in the laboratory there are other forms of disturbance, you have to try outside with battery power. It is not possible to measure the signal on the collector of TR4 with an oscilloscope because the signal disappears, the DC output measurement is sufficient. Also try to keep the antenna very short, 10 -15cm, inside the laboratory.
                Yes mr franco i was thinking this is for laboratory i think the test should be outside the laboratory

                Comment


                • Originally posted by edward View Post
                  Yes mr franco i was thinking this is for laboratory i think the test should be outside the laboratory
                  When I said that the measurement could not be performed with the scope I meant the 8MHz signal. Tell me the measurements of your sensor stage pcb, have you connected the lower part to the ground?

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                    When I said that the measurement could not be performed with the scope I meant the 8MHz signal. Tell me the measurements of your sensor stage pcb, have you connected the lower part to the ground?
                    Yes the lower part was connected to ground

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                      DC voltage of TR4 collector must be about 5-6V but with R10=1K, by changing R10 also collector voltage changes. You have =0V with quartz because the gain is very poor, try C2 only (disconnect C3/C4) you have 1pF, if you have no result try 2pf or more.
                      But if the laboratory is the reason this means when the lrl approaches the phenomenon the sensor start to self oscilating??

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by edward View Post
                        But if the laboratory is the reason this means when the lrl approaches the phenomenon the sensor start to self oscilating??
                        No, the lrl is also very sensible to many electromagnetic disturbances, also in my lab I have many signals.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                          No, the lrl is also very sensible to many electromagnetic disturbances, also in my lab I have many signals.
                          In my laboratory there is laptop , wireless modem , swithching powersupply , osciloscope , near the pcb when i am testing and on the left and right sides of my laboratory there is tow stores with same instruments

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by edward View Post
                            In my laboratory there is laptop , wireless modem , swithching powersupply , osciloscope , near the pcb when i am testing and on the left and right sides of my laboratory there is tow stores with same instruments
                            sources of disturbance can be even a few meters away. Several years ago I was in an area with TV repeaters, in that place the lrl was practically unusable for a radius of at least 100m. The input circuit, L1 / C10, is tuned around 100Mhz, any transmitter on that frequency, or superior harmonic or sub harmonic, can generate a signal in the lrl.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by FrancoItaly View Post
                              sources of disturbance can be even a few meters away. Several years ago I was in an area with TV repeaters, in that place the lrl was practically unusable for a radius of at least 100m. The input circuit, L1 / C10, is tuned around 100Mhz, any transmitter on that frequency, or superior harmonic or sub harmonic, can generate a signal in the lrl.
                              I tested the circuit in another place and the results was same

                              I have 7 volts in my output without quartz and c13 , c14 560pf
                              C2 , c3 , c4 = 1 pf r10 , r12 =1k
                              Does your lrl work with this state and without quartz? I have 6 to 7 volts in my aoutput and when i touch the antenna the voltage decreases about 200 milivolts

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by edward View Post
                                I tested the circuit in another place and the results was same

                                I have 7 volts in my output without quartz and c13 , c14 560pf
                                C2 , c3 , c4 = 1 pf r10 , r12 =1k
                                Does your lrl work with this state and without quartz? I have 6 to 7 volts in my aoutput and when i touch the antenna the voltage decreases about 200 milivolts
                                Yes, my lrl also works this way, in fact this lrl originated from an RF sniffer that self oscillated, later I wanted to create a lrl simpler to set up. I realized that the self-oscillation was due to the characteristics of the pcb.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X