Needs an advice for a detector

[Fred]

Hi Nicolas,

You do realize that is only a surface 3d mapping system, right ?

You can look here the Laser LRL

http://www.alphageofisica.com.br/mdl/quarryman.htm

http://www.alphageofisica.com.br/produtos.html

[Fred]

I agree the skeptics have a unique perspective as they sit in their armchair and dictate which device is proven unworthy.
.

Wrong. They are just waiting for a device to be proven worthy, and they better be sit, for that may take a while to happen...

[Nicolas]

Hi Nicolas,

You do realize that is only a surface 3d mapping system, right ?

No my friend it's LRL with 3D see her specification.

You can locate and find treasures with this device

[Fred]

According to the pdf, it is only a 3d laser mapping system. It can only detect a treasure if it it visible and above a surface.
For that purpose, you eyes work better...And a flashlight, eventually.

[Nicolas]

According to the pdf, it is only a 3d laser mapping system. It can only detect a treasure if it it visible and above a surface.
For that purpose, you eyes work better...And a flashlight, eventually.

Can be but each of us how to understand something
I see that this is not a device topography

you can see other type of device maybe this

http://www.alphageofisica.com.br/gssi/gpr.htm

[Dave J.]

now GPR.....

That's ground-penetrating radar. Completely different from laser rangefinders. However, both actually work, so neither is of any interest to LRL aficionados.

[Dave J.]

pololu

(the link behind sensors_A)

Hey, they've got some really neat electronic experimenter stuff! Not much use for that in LRL's, though.

[hung]

Can be but each of us how to understand something
I see that this is not a device topography

you can see other type of device maybe this

http://www.alphageofisica.com.br/gssi/gpr.htm

Very good Nicolas. Congratulations.
You are absolutely correct.
Indeed, both devices can perfectly work as long range locators. There are key factors in the technology of these devices that make them special. And you did perceive them. You have my respect.

[Fred]

Of course. Just as you could use a piece of brass rod shaped in L , a weight hanging, a calculator glued on a rotating handle, or anything giving enough random information to make your mind find a pattern after you have found something considered "interesting".
If carrying a TV set showing noise would be easy, it could be an excellent choice for LRL .

[Dell Winders]

That's ground-penetrating radar. Completely different from laser rangefinders. However, both actually work, so neither is of any interest to LRL aficionados.

Why not , dave? I own two GPR's and a complete set of Antennas. I've done many comparison tests with GPR and LRL.

You failed to mention that GPR has limitations, and like LRL, it only works when operating conditions are favorable.

Better do some more Googling to keep your stupid pretend dog from barking up the wrong tree. WEIS!

Dell