You mentioned earlier that the catalyst is roughly GHz, and this frequency is weak in penetration. It can be used for surface stimulation only
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
YES DIGITAL CAMERAS CAN SEE UNDERGROUND EASY AND LIVE
Collapse
X
-
But if the transmitter used harmonic frequency it could penetrateOriginally posted by omar View PostYou mentioned earlier that the catalyst is roughly GHz, and this frequency is weak in penetration. It can be used for surface stimulation only
The main issue is what is the transmitter and what does it transmit
Comment
-
The stimulator does not have a transmitting antenna, according to the observation. It is definitely a high radio frequency microwave (GHz), as it does not need a transmitting antenna used to stimulate the beam stuck under the earth?s crust until it comes out and is captured by the camera ----------------- This confirms the idea of a ray of particles.
Comment
-
See the bluetooth antenna is printed on the board and bluetooth can communicate through barriers and distances of ten meters or moreOriginally posted by omar View PostThe stimulator does not have a transmitting antenna, according to the observation. It is definitely a high radio frequency microwave (GHz), as it does not need a transmitting antenna used to stimulate the beam stuck under the earth?s crust until it comes out and is captured by the camera ----------------- This confirms the idea of a ray of particles.

A ray source such as a diode or something else cannot penetrate the ground for several metres, but the difference between the Bluetooth transmission and the traditional transmitter is that it works with
UWB technology
Comment
-
Well, let's go to the other side. There is a great similarity in performance and specifications between our camera and gamma cameras, and sometimes an identical similarity, such as the relatively large imaging deviation, weak in moisture and reflected from ceramics, and it takes time to form the image and visualize the gamma background on the surface of the earth. Gamma cameras use sodium nudide crystal to convert gamma photons into visible light photons.
Comment
-
-
No for sure if this camera easy and constructed in traditional way then you can find many many copies of itOriginally posted by humhum View PostDoes Cosmic waves reflected from underground object and can create harmonic in THz wave
for Camera image ??
Even Sony company couldn't solve how it's working
Comment
-
Welcome jafal.
Like you, I tried logically to find out what the camera really sees.
Always with logic I understood why camera used a darkroom, why LEDs are used and how it can see and what camera can see
Of course the camera needs an exciter, which is low power and definitely low frequency as your opinion
I tried to help some members with my conclusions, but unfortunately I found out that they work exclusively for themselves.
In this case, I think it is not easy to give the final instructions to build this camera
Comment
-
I am working just for funOriginally posted by Rubin View PostWelcome jafal.
Like you, I tried logically to find out what the camera really sees.
Always with logic I understood why camera used a darkroom, why LEDs are used and how it can see and what camera can see
Of course the camera needs an exciter, which is low power and definitely low frequency as your opinion
I tried to help some members with my conclusions, but unfortunately I found out that they work exclusively for themselves.
In this case, I think it is not easy to give the final instructions to build this camera
The camera is not my goal ..... The principal of the exciter is unusual thing but to make it more sense for thinking it's certain frequency allowed to make the camera shoot underground
What iam trying say that it's frequency sent in pattern and reflected with new specifications
For instance if you removed the Infrared filter from any digital camera you can capture any internal WiFi box so the 2.4 GHz could penetrate plastic box and unfiltered camera could capture it
The idea of the exciter close to this idea
All my reading about the technology and research not modern articles I read the 1970's and less when was the transistor the core of all electronics
I have read and study thousands of patents and applied hundreds of experiments I saw most metal detectors there is real long range locaters but I never saw real idea if any one has real and working idea he won't post it
The working Long Range Locater must be transmitter and
receiver and timing between TR/TX (gating)
There is nothing called phenomenon even there is phenomenon as it's discovered it has logic and explanation but most of lrl depends on phenomenon (which is dreams)
I have made aproxmity sensor up to 1000 meter or more depends on TX/RX and gating with just 7 transistors only
Comment
-
Also, I only work for fun.
Now if I can do something better for my hobby, it is definitely welcome.
Many years ago I had in my hands to try a camera about the same as the one we mention in this thread and a paper that printed the buried object.
Different techniques with the same results
Both with personal tests, really did work.
All the tests I did were on metal objects that I buried at a depth of up to 30 cm.
I have no doubt about the results, because the tests were done with my own hands.
This is the reason why after many years I decided to study again what exactly is happening.
But here in the forum we do not know who is really a hobbyist and who is a professional.
This is the reason why we can not have possible results with honest ideas.
Everything can be done if we think as a whole and not individually.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rubin View PostWelcome jafal.
Like you, I tried logically to find out what the camera really sees.
Always with logic I understood why camera used a darkroom, why LEDs are used and how it can see and what camera can see
Of course the camera needs an exciter, which is low power and definitely low frequency as your opinion
I tried to help some members with my conclusions, but unfortunately I found out that they work exclusively for themselves.
In this case, I think it is not easy to give the final instructions to build this camera
Low frequencies need an antenna coil to transmit, short and medium frequencies and FM need an antenna The stimulus circuit has been seen does not contain a visible antenna
Comment
-
My goal is to develop the camera to detect oil and gas wells and groundwater at a low cost and to provide a service for myself and the community. We cannot provide definitive information about the camera, but we are trying to bring the image closer so that everyone can benefit from manufacturers, professionals and amateurs. As I said earlier, there are several copies of them, some of them use vacuum tubes, some use gas, and some use lenses, all of which depict the ray flowing from the ground naturally. There is a physical work that must be achieved for the imaging to succeed, and the methods are multiple.
Comment

Comment