YES DIGITAL CAMERAS CAN SEE UNDERGROUND EASY AND LIVE

[Rubin]

Low frequencies need an antenna coil to transmit, short and medium frequencies and FM need an antenna The stimulus circuit has been seen does not contain a visible antenna

Thank you for your comments!

[humhum]

The stimulus circuit has been seen does not contain a visible antenna

Where is the stimulus circuit ? Where has been seen ?

[jafal]

Where is the stimulus circuit ? Where has been seen ?

They saw it with the camera owner

[elhit29]

This particular camera detects voids and every thing contained in such void: including metal objects..

The best versions thereof use vacuumed tubes containing multiple kinds of gas.
Waves going back and forth, the pulse value exceeds 2450 Mhz.

Its major failure is where there is layers of lead exist!! Can't penetrate for sure. Most old civilizations were surely aware of the science behind lead! That's why they use it to protect from treasure hunters.. they certainly knew the physics and chemistry behind lead, moreover, they made witchcraft on lead for the same purpose.
As a result, even professional dowsers their time (only quite a few) can detect gold in presence of lead layers, and even if they succeed doing this, the lead will throw the detected zero spot tens of meters away due to lead's unique physical property.
_----------------------------

My goal is to develop the camera to detect oil and gas wells and groundwater at a low cost and to provide a service for myself and the community. We cannot provide definitive information about the camera, but we are trying to bring the image closer so that everyone can benefit from manufacturers, professionals and amateurs. As I said earlier, there are several copies of them, some of them use vacuum tubes, some use gas, and some use lenses, all of which depict the ray flowing from the ground naturally. There is a physical work that must be achieved for the imaging to succeed, and the methods are multiple.

[Rubin]

This particular camera detects voids and every thing contained in such void: including metal objects..

The best versions thereof use vacuumed tubes containing multiple kinds of gas.
Waves going back and forth, the pulse value exceeds 2450 Mhz......

_----------------------------

I always write with a logical conclusion.
You say, "The best versions of them use vacuum cleaner tubes that contain a lot of gas."
Even if it is right.
How could those who made it make a vacuum cleaner tube and contain gas?
Today we talk about it, it is relatively easy, a few years ago it was difficult, so logic says that this method is not used but a simple tube as a darkroom.
You say for frequency> 2450MHz
Let's talk about the year 2015.
There were few manufacturers that offered portable generators at these frequencies.
Even today, every amateur needs a serious lab to build a generator at GHZ frequencies.
Of course today things are easy, but the first cameras started before the year 2010.
So logic says that if high frequency is used it is <1GHZ that any serious electronic engineer can create and experiment with it, always before the year 2010

[elhit29]

First of all, I gave you facts on the ground (not theories) for already-existing best made cameras.. so it's up to you if you want to take it or not.

I said (vacuumed tube) filled with multiple kinds of gas. And yes the pulse value is 2450Mhz. These are very general facts, yet the detailed manufacturing know-how remains a trade-secret of the inventor, but the facts above are true100%. Even the Sony camera manufacurers don't know it.. The guys that showed videos for the camera in this forum, all of them, without exception, possess false cameras that show objects that are analysed according to whatever his brain imagine seeing!! It is illusionary!! But as for the true genuine camera, everyone will see the same object -No illusion or double opinion- and can even read the letters or drawings carved or printed on it!! This is a fact.
-----------------------------------------------

I always write with a logical conclusion.
You say, "The best versions of them use vacuum cleaner tubes that contain a lot of gas."
Even if it is right.
How could those who made it make a vacuum cleaner tube and contain gas?
Today we talk about it, it is relatively easy, a few years ago it was difficult, so logic says that this method is not used but a simple tube as a darkroom.
You say for frequency> 2450MHz
Let's talk about the year 2015.
There were few manufacturers that offered portable generators at these frequencies.
Even today, every amateur needs a serious lab to build a generator at GHZ frequencies.
Of course today things are easy, but the first cameras started before the year 2010.
So logic says that if high frequency is used it is <1GHZ that any serious electronic engineer can create and experiment with it, always before the year 2010

[Rubin]

Dear elhit
I do not want to offend you. If you think so I apologize.
I just follow logic.
I saw such a real camera many years ago.
I did not open it, I was just experimenting, that was the deal.
The one who made it was an amateur.
Of course it was not possible to build a vacuum tube or generator at very high frequencies.
I am sure of this from my experience!
And yet it made a perfect depiction of buried objects buried by me at a shallow depth.
And I ask you.
Does not require special specifications, but is a simple construction with small extra tips?
As I have written I have understood "what the camera sees".

[elhit29]

No offence no need to apologise..
The info I provide is directly from the Professional Inventor who manufactured it.. Dozens of amateurs tried to copy.. they failed.. The info above is genuine.
By the way the camera will not see the first meter underground.. it will see from two meters up till 35 meters underground, the clarity depends on the nature of ground itself..
It will not penetrate carpets or ceramic. Yet it can pentrate rocky land with no problem.

Too too many persons claimed in this forum they made the camera exactly as the genuine camera, but the results are illusionary.. soin my opinion they failed!!
-----------------------------------

Dear elhitI do not want to offend you. If you think so I apologize.
I just follow logic.
I saw such a real camera many years ago.
I did not open it, I was just experimenting, that was the deal.
The one who made it was an amateur.
Of course it was not possible to build a vacuum tube or generator at very high frequencies.
I am sure of this from my experience!
And yet it made a perfect depiction of buried objects buried by me at a shallow depth.
And I ask you.
Does not require special specifications, but is a simple construction with small extra tips?
As I have written I have understood "what the camera sees".

[jafal]

Hi dear elhit

(vacuumed tube) filled with multiple kinds of gas. And yes the pulse value is 2450Mhz. These are very general facts,


Once while I am studying airport passenger inspection camera which able to see under clothes I saw in the circuit a resonance section generates frequency from 12 GHz to 180 GHz ... It was locked in metal can about 4x4x1 cm I was not allowed to open it

[omar]

There are several versions of this camera, as we mentioned in more detail, including the one that uses the vacuum tube, which is a sensor and image multiplier, an alternative to ccd / coms --------- and one of them uses a gas tube subject to an electric field when entering the penetrating beam that collides with gas particles ( shine) and be an image. Including what uses LED light for detection. Therefore, they focused on the LED version, which is the easiest and serves the same purpose if industrial catalysts are used with it, and it may be the best version that can reach the maximum limits of this technology. So my talk will be about the LED version only.

[omar]

We apologize to friends, we are trying to zoom in without harming the manufacturers of this camera. So we grab the stick in half, not necessarily everything that is written is 100% correct. It is only approximate and not final --------------------------- According to our knowledge of the catalyst, there are three types of it, some of which are superficial, and some of which are internal, which are injected into the ground. And what is polarized (for LED light feeding). With my best wishes to you.

[omar]

In the end, I extend my heartfelt thanks to my friends Jafal and Al-Hayt29. For the useful information they provided, God made it in the balance of your good deeds -------------- And in the end, I present to my friend Robin and the rest of the friends this gift, which is a partial explanation of the version that uses the radio signal injection to the ground using focused white light by an optical fiber or a collecting lens. And the following picture suffices the explanation -------------- I wish you good luck

[humhum]

the version that uses the radio signal injection to the ground

Does location matter of Stimulator (2.45Ghz) ?
Where should the stimulator stand ?
in Pocket of user ,
or in front side of two IR Tx leds or Lens ?

Does Stimulator Need fine tuning if is in front of Camera and Lens ?

[humhum]

And what is polarized (for LED light feeding). .

I know that is two IR LEDs , is it wrong ?

[omar]

First, enlarge the image -------- the optical fibers are independent outside ...... and the infrared LED light inside the koshakah is independent -------- This camera is not mine ******** This is my last post on the subject, thank you