Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bionic X4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by WM6 View Post
    Go Morgan, maybe you are on right way.
    I have LRL´s who work as LRL´s and I NEVER THINK TO ASK THIS THOUSANDS OF EUROS,IF SOMEONE WANT TO BUY ONE FROM ME,anyway i´m not interested to sell,and the few i have built need circuts and coils camuflage 100% becouse VERY EASY TO BUILD AND CLONAGE.I can sell only limited PDK´s for friends that i know WELL and to help them in TH´. About OKM,they are allways studing the best way to deceive the crazy and rich client,so,i invite OKM to came here to my field test,and if BIONIC works as LRL i will put public my apologise to them.
    I wondering,how is possible people believe in the NONSENSE 15 KM for locating treasure with BIONIC ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????

    Comment


    • #17
      Inga say...

      Originally posted by Morgan View Post
      I have LRL´s who work as LRL´s and I NEVER THINK TO ASK THIS THOUSANDS OF EUROS,IF SOMEONE WANT TO BUY ONE FROM ME,anyway i´m not interested to sell,and the few i have built need circuts and coils camuflage 100% becouse VERY EASY TO BUILD AND CLONAGE.I can sell only limited PDK´s for friends that i know WELL and to help them in TH´. About OKM,they are allways studing the best way to deceive the crazy and rich client,so,i invite OKM to came here to my field test,and if BIONIC works as LRL i will put public my apologise to them.
      I wondering,how is possible people believe in the NONSENSE 15 KM for locating treasure with BIONIC ?????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????????????????????
      Inga said,BETTER SPEND THE MONEY IN A SECOD HAND MERCEDES...


      Click image for larger version

Name:	Inga not found treasure with BIONIC-01.jpg
Views:	4
Size:	67.0 KB
ID:	87538

      Comment


      • #18
        MINEORO versus PDK

        Originally posted by hung View Post
        The price is about 700 bucks higher than the B01.
        But the bottomline is that high prices discourage people to open the box and mess around inside risking damaging the device.
        If someday I were to sell my own built devices I would ask astonomical prices.

        Anyway for what the B01 does for the current price of gold, in the first excursion finding only 1 KG of gold pays about 3 units already.

        What turns hilarious is the fact that some 'skepthics' here seem to support a few homebrew LRL projects in this forum and curse the ones that are sold with high technology.
        See ya around Mike.
        Hung, i respect your atitude about MINEORO,yes in some conditions they can WORK as LRL´s, the proof for this is the PDK circuit,this amazing Passive Receiver ,i supose, start with Alonso and Damasio,so MINEORO in special atmosferic and ground conditions will work.
        But the OKM is a FRAUD that i advertise you better not promote here,and if you PM me,i can give you phone nr of people who test BIONIC in field,in BAVARIA, GERMANY,"O" results in HOT places for TH´s. So,be more kind with people´s wallet

        Comment


        • #19
          Keep cool Morgan, don't waste your nerves!

          When will this "substanceless" infotalk finally ends??
          I hope soon, it's such a waste of time, it seeds aggressions and doesn't bring us any further to a proven real working long or at least medium range locator.

          I'm pretty shure that OKM Bionic works somehow - yes - but the same unreliable as Mineoro devices.

          But we have to find a way for a test procedure that is solid enough to win a trial.

          Metal is metal and gold is no miracle and no wonder metal !!!

          So it has to be possible that every kind of metal is detectable by OKM or Mineoro or whatever and if their Bionix x4 or any other such LRL claims it can find gold from a long distance first this device has to prove that it can find old rusty iron objects!

          btw. what means "bionic"? quote from OKM: it uses the bio-engery of the user. WHAT??? This is totally nonsense or esoteric crap. It's like the claim that crystal clear quartz stones will purify the room and help against electro-smog.

          btw. how much shall cost this new x4? 10.000 Euros?
          This would be be robbery and fraud on a VERY high level if this unit doesn't find the claimed stuff and there has to be a way to test if it really works!

          This is no crystal-ball used by a fortune-teller but reproducable electronical circuit in interaction with detectable signals (if it works).

          And we will find a way to test this stuff - because this is very important, also for repeatable test sessions to improve the sensitivity and finding the needed adjustment methods.


          Morgan, I hope your new 3-10 times better stimulation add-on is good enough for secure repeatable test sessions under variying conditions and you will find a way to make your PDK switchable to all kind of metals! Good luck and if you like we can work together "against" OKM until we know what's really going on with their LRLs.


          Perhaps I will mail them in german and ask them how they want to secure me that their stuff is really working... If they think they can sell extremly overpriced stuff that nobody is able to control and proof how and if those are working indeed they have no idea how much possibilities I can find to get the whole truth about their LRLs!

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
            At the same time I can't defend Morgan's logic that because someone has not found treasure means it doesn't work. This is skeptic logic and it's false.

            So what sort of logic is it then?
            If it doesn't detect treasure, then the conclusion is that it doesn't work as advertised. They didn't even find anything in the promotional video. It was more of a mockery than a serious piece of work. How much more self deception can you stand?

            Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
            Whether it works or not, I don't know and probably never will.
            In that case you need to determine the facts first, before giving an opinion.

            Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
            Speaking of prices, I bought a metal detector cost over $600 thirty years ago. That's something like $2000 in todays dollars. Today you can buy one just as good for about $150. So I can easily conclude that I got scammed big time by a well respected metal detector company. Funny the sketpics who work for the MD companies use the same argument about LRL's.
            You were probably what's called an "early adopter". These are people who like to buy the latest technology, even though they have to pay a premium. The same piece of equipment is no being purchased by the "laggards", at a much lower price. This is called marketing, not scamming.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Funfinder View Post
              I'm pretty shure that OKM Bionic works somehow - yes - but the same unreliable as Mineoro devices.
              How can you say you are sure it works? You've only seen a comical video, that looks like a James Bond parody.

              Originally posted by Funfinder View Post
              btw. what means "bionic"? quote from OKM: it uses the bio-engery of the user. WHAT??? This is totally nonsense or esoteric crap. It's like the claim that crystal clear quartz stones will purify the room and help against electro-smog.
              Now I'm confused. One moment you say "I'm pretty shure [sic] that OKM Bionic works", then you say "This is totally nonsense or esoteric crap.".
              I know which one I think is correct.

              Originally posted by Funfinder View Post
              Perhaps I will mail them in german and ask them how they want to secure me that their stuff is really working... If they think they can sell extremly overpriced stuff that nobody is able to control and proof how and if those are working indeed they have no idea how much possibilities I can find to get the whole truth about their LRLs!
              Good luck with that!
              I doubt you'll even get a response. Well ... not a sensible one anyway.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post

                So what sort of logic is it then?
                If it doesn't detect treasure, then the conclusion is that it doesn't work as advertised. They didn't even find anything in the promotional video. It was more of a mockery than a serious piece of work. How much more self deception can you stand?


                In that case you need to determine the facts first, before giving an opinion.


                You were probably what's called an "early adopter". These are people who like to buy the latest technology, even though they have to pay a premium. The same piece of equipment is no being purchased by the "laggards", at a much lower price. This is called marketing, not scamming.
                Faulty logic. It's called inductive reasoning. You take one peice of info and make baseless generalizations.

                I don't know why I have to repeat, so I'll waste some more time and try to rephase for those with reading comprehension deficit. I bought a top-of-the-line metal detector. Many people say it works. Why am I not rich? I've spend hundreds of hours searching parks, old homes, you name it. I've done research, I've read many books on the subject, read internet forums from supposedly successful detectorists, but I'm still not rich. So if I use the skeptic logic I could easily conclude the metal detector DOES NOT WORK BECAUSE IT DOES NOT FIND TREASURE. I think all those people who claim to have found treasure are full of it. The are self delusional.

                It's called marketing when it's a metal detector and it's called scamming when it's an LRL. That's more skeptic logic.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
                  Faulty logic. It's called inductive reasoning. You take one peice of info and make baseless generalizations.

                  I don't know why I have to repeat, so I'll waste some more time and try to rephase for those with reading comprehension deficit. I bought a top-of-the-line metal detector. Many people say it works. Why am I not rich? I've spend hundreds of hours searching parks, old homes, you name it. I've done research, I've read many books on the subject, read internet forums from supposedly successful detectorists, but I'm still not rich. So if I use the skeptic logic I could easily conclude the metal detector DOES NOT WORK BECAUSE IT DOES NOT FIND TREASURE. I think all those people who claim to have found treasure are full of it. The are self delusional.

                  It's called marketing when it's a metal detector and it's called scamming when it's an LRL. That's more skeptic logic.
                  If you cannot find yourself in this definitions, then look for Fraud:

                  "Definitions of Scam on the Web:


                  A confidence trick, confidence game, or con for short (also known as a scam) is an attempt to intentionally mislead a person or persons (known as the mark) usually with the goal of financial or other gain. The confidence trickster, con man, scam artist or con artist often works with an accomplice called the shill, who tries to encourage the mark by pretending to believe the trickster. ...
                  en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scam"
                  A ploy by a shyster to raise money.
                  www.nbmg.unr.edu/comstockscience/vocab1.shtml
                  a fraudulent business scheme
                  victimize: deprive of by deceit; "He swindled me out of my inheritance"; "She defrauded the customers who trusted her"; "the cashier gypped me when he gave me too little change"
                  wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
                  Global capital is ruining your life?
                  You have right to self-defence!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
                    Faulty logic. It's called inductive reasoning. You take one peice of info and make baseless generalizations.

                    I don't know why I have to repeat, so I'll waste some more time and try to rephase for those with reading comprehension deficit. I bought a top-of-the-line metal detector. Many people say it works. Why am I not rich? I've spend hundreds of hours searching parks, old homes, you name it. I've done research, I've read many books on the subject, read internet forums from supposedly successful detectorists, but I'm still not rich. So if I use the skeptic logic I could easily conclude the metal detector DOES NOT WORK BECAUSE IT DOES NOT FIND TREASURE. I think all those people who claim to have found treasure are full of it. The are self delusional.

                    It's called marketing when it's a metal detector and it's called scamming when it's an LRL. That's more skeptic logic.
                    Wait a minute... Maybe Mike has something here.

                    From what Mike explained...
                    When using skeptic logic we can conclude that metal detectors do not work because they do not find treasure.
                    And metal detectors are therefore a scam.
                    Any attempt to pretend metal detectors are not a scam is skeptic's logic.

                    Yup now we know how correct and faulty logic works.
                    But wait...

                    Let's check to make sure we got the facts right.
                    Let's look in some treasure forums to see how treasures are found.

                    Google shows Find's treasure forum at the top of the list. http://www.findmall.com/
                    Hmmm... Find's treasure forum has 28 sections that show recoveries made when using popular conventional metal detectors.
                    I don't see any sections showing recoveries made by dowsing or LRLs here.

                    It seems like everyone at Find's forum is talking about and posting photos of the treasures they found with their metal detectors.
                    Dang, there's thousands of photos of treasures they found with metal detectors, and more keep coming.
                    I wonder if findmall is a skeptic scam site?

                    Hmmm... maybe we should go down the google list to other treasure hunter forums.







                    It seems every one of these treasure forums is full of photos of treasures people found with metal detectors.
                    This does not look like one piece of baseless information. It looks more like thousands of forum posts showing photos of treasure recovered.
                    Maybe Mike Mont's facts are wrong.
                    Is it possible that Mike did not find any treasure with his metal detector because he doesn't know how?

                    Very puzzling, this logic stuff...


                    Best wishes,
                    J_P

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      It's a true statement to say a metal detector does not find treasure, does not find gold. There is no metal detector made that can find gold. They can detect metal if within a few inches of it.

                      Most every metal detecer ever made is sitting in a closet somewhere collecting dust because the owner was deluded into believing they could get rich with it. Just look at the deceptive advertising. Very few (if any) people in the entire world can make better than minimum wage with a metal detector on a regular basis. The advertising doesn't tell you this.

                      Metal detectors will hurt you. Anyone who uses one on long term is probably suffering from joint problems. Knees are a bad one, but shoulders, wrists, back, you name it just about every joint in the human body suffers. In the end a person is going to give all the money they ever found to doctors and hospitals to repair the damage done. The advertising doesn't tell you this.

                      As for cache hunting with an LRL, let's face it nearly everyone who owns one is a cache hunter. Just by it's nature, cache hunting is few and far between finds. As I said there are too many reasons to list. And anyone who divulges what they found is a fool, fool, fool.

                      "Dream like you live forever. Live like you die today."

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
                        Why am I not rich? I've spend hundreds of hours searching parks, old homes, you name it. I've done research, I've read many books on the subject, read internet forums from supposedly successful detectorists, but I'm still not rich. So if I use the skeptic logic I could easily conclude the metal detector DOES NOT WORK BECAUSE IT DOES NOT FIND TREASURE. I think all those people who claim to have found treasure are full of it. The are self delusional.
                        Maybe it's because you've spent too much time with your dowsing contraption, and not enough time with the metal detector. If the dowsing stuff really worked, you wouldn't be saying, "Why am I not rich?".

                        Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                        Google shows Find's treasure forum at the top of the list. http://www.findmall.com/
                        Hmmm... Find's treasure forum has 28 sections that show recoveries made when using popular conventional metal detectors.
                        I don't see any sections showing recoveries made by dowsing or LRLs here.
                        That's because there aren't any. And is also the reason why Mike (Mont) is not rich.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          This has turned into a skeptic circle jerk. Typical pseudo-skeptic logic. Anyone here really think these skeptics are sincere? They are not. They don't have a leg to stand on. This whole pseudo-skeptic thing is all bogus folks--every word of it.

                          I posted the link http://debunkingskeptics.com/Page1.htm

                          I suggest EVERYONE read this. Of course the skeptics won't because they are afraid to look in the mirror. Reminds me what an alcoholic told me, "It's hard to shave the morning after when you can't look at yourself in the mirror."

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
                            Maybe it's because you've spent too much time with your dowsing contraption, and not enough time with the metal detector. If the dowsing stuff really worked, you wouldn't be saying, "Why am I not rich?".
                            Now what are you say?????
                            The same says and any user of a metal detector so this means that metal detectors don't work?????
                            Calm......
                            Geo

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              C'mon Mike, there are some cheap metal detectors that are the joy of the ladies in the house.
                              The viper model looks hot.

                              Gold Metal Detectors
                              "Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Geo View Post
                                Now what are you say?????
                                The same says and any user of a metal detector so this means that metal detectors don't work?????
                                Calm......
                                You misunderstand me. Mike (Mont) was saying he has spent hundreds of hours searching parks, old homes, etc., [with a metal detector]. But he still is not rich. My comment was simply to point out that (despite promoting LRs and dowsing) the situation had not changed.

                                By the way, the majority of metal detectorists will never get rich. But then, neither will dowsers.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X