Dear teachers, please comment

[J_Player]

tank you dear j-p and wm6
Are the frequencies of all elements of their basement?
Are Sense and it is by the vlf reciver?
Frequency difference between metals and other elements in what is understood and how?
Do you have metal in the basement, each with a specific frequency?
In what part of the circuit operating frequency can be measured with a frequency counter?
with respect
jack

I know of no VLF frequencies which are for different elements.
The experimenters who are using VLF receivers to locate metal are using frequencies between 40 KHz and 180 KHz.
They say the frequency does not make a difference for different metals.

For VLF penetration into the ground, the lower frequencies can penetrate deeper than the higher frequencies.
But lower frequencies are not able to find small objects as well as higher frequencies.
The best compromise which experimenters use is 60 Khz to 120 KHz.
60-120 KHz frequency range is able to penetrate the ground maybe 2-5 meters deep for a VLF transmission.
If your receiver is set in this frequency, then you will need to have a VLF signal in the air to receive.
This means you will need to have VLF noise or transmitter somewhere making a radio signal for your receiver to tune to.

If you expect to find metals from only special metal frequencies of elements, then you need to find instructions from some different person.
I do not believe you will find a frequency of different elements to be detected with this receiver.
I think you will find only radio transmissions and radio noise.
And if you are lucky to be tuned to a VLF transmitter frequency, you may also find some indications of large buried things in the ground.

Best wishes,
J_P

[jack]

I know of no VLF frequencies which are for different elements.
The experimenters who are using VLF receivers to locate metal are using frequencies between 40 KHz and 180 KHz.
They say the frequency does not make a difference for different metals.

For VLF penetration into the ground, the lower frequencies can penetrate deeper than the higher frequencies.
But lower frequencies are not able to find small objects as well as higher frequencies.
The best compromise which experimenters use is 60 Khz to 120 KHz.
60-120 KHz frequency range is able to penetrate the ground maybe 2-5 meters deep for a VLF transmission.
If your receiver is set in this frequency, then you will need to have a VLF signal in the air to receive.
This means you will need to have VLF noise or transmitter somewhere making a radio signal for your receiver to tune to.

If you expect to find metals from only special metal frequencies of elements, then you need to find instructions from some different person.
I do not believe you will find a frequency of different elements to be detected with this receiver.
I think you will find only radio transmissions and radio noise.
And if you are lucky to be tuned to a VLF transmitter frequency, you may also find some indications of large buried things in the ground.

Best wishes,
J_P

tank you very much j-p
Total to you Can I modify the receiver to detect metals that wm6 remote use?
The circuit itself is able to detect small metal on earth?(with ferrit coil)
you believe a frequency of 60 kHz to 120 kHz can be set to find a suitable metal?
The receiver with ferrite antenna you can make clear whether the metal in the radial (What size is the smallest possible metal)?
Best wishes for you dear j-p

[J_Player]

tank you very much j-p
Total to you Can I modify the receiver to detect metals that wm6 remote use?
The circuit itself is able to detect small metal on earth?(with ferrit coil)
you believe a frequency of 60 kHz to 120 kHz can be set to find a suitable metal?
The receiver with ferrite antenna you can make clear whether the metal in the radial (What size is the smallest possible metal)?
Best wishes for you dear j-p

No the circuit by itself with ferrite coil cannot detect small metal on the earth.
In order to detect small metal you must also have a transmission of the frequency which you are tuned to, and you must hold the ferrite close to the small metal.
If there is a VLF transmitter sending a radio signal which you can tune to, then if you are lucky, maybe you can locate large buried things from more than 1 meter with this receiver circuit and ferrite.
Geologists can locate large buried things with a similar receiver when there is a VLF transmitter located 300 miles distance or less.
If there is no transmitter sending radio waves for them to receive, then they must set their own VLF transmitter to send a signal for their receiver to receive.
They usually put a very large loop of cable on the ground to transmit their VLF signal, then they walk inside of the loop to look for things buried.

These geologists do not find small metal things, only large things like rock formations, and sometimes large buried metal tanks and other large metal things.
They use large air loops maybe the same size as a large metal detector coil to find large things.
But experimenters use ferrites to keep the searching receiver coil smaller and to search for smaller things.
The experimenters also use higher frequencies than geologists so they can find smaller things.
Experimenters do not use 5 KHz to 30 KHz which geologists use. They use higher 60-120 KHz.
Nobody can say what is the smallest size metal you can find.
The only way to know how small metal things you can find is to built the receiver and tune to a frequency where you can receive a vLF transmission.
Then test to see if you can find large things or small things.
If you can find large things, then keep looking until you find smaller things.
After enough practice you will know what is the smallest thing you can find.

Some people say you cannot find anything with a VLF receiver.
But I think you can because I see publications from Geologists who find things buried when using a VLF receiver tuned to a VLF broadcast.

Best wishes,
J_P

[detectoman]

j_p i see you have very much advances knolodge on lrl today in ( comparision ) whit earlier years when i look you reach all lrlts teories
j p yo veo que usted tiene muchos avances de conocimiento ahora sobre long range deteccion en comparacion con anteriores años cuando yo miraba que usted rechazaba las teorias de lrlstas
abrazos

[J_Player]

j_p i see you have very much advances knolodge on lrl today in ( comparision ) whit earlier years when i look you reach all lrlts teories
j p yo veo que usted tiene muchos avances de conocimiento ahora sobre long range deteccion en comparacion con anteriores años cuando yo miraba que usted rechazaba las teorias de lrlstas
abrazos

Hi D-man,
I am not talking about theories.
I am stating facts.
It is a fact that geologists use VLF for locating things under the ground.
We all have known this fact for many years.
This is not a new advance in knowledge.
You can see my early 2006 posts in Geotech forum where I argued with Carl-NC to say that gold can corrode in tiny amounts when it is buried in the ground.

http://www.longrangelocators.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11392#post41652

I say the same today as I said in 2006.
What has changed is that the SGS company has performed thousands more tests since that time to prove that gold forms ions in the ground.
So I see the chemistry for forming gold ions is slightly different than I originally thought.

You will see I have not learned new LRL pseudoscience.
Nobody has been able to teach me that buried treasures resonate to a frequency that I can tune with a receiver and locate the treasure.

I have one LRL on loan which does not help me to locate treasure. Nor does it help anyone else who tried it to locate treasure.
So I learned nothing new except what some scientists teach for buried gold.
Maybe Crypton company will show us a good LRL that can be used by anyone to locate buried metals.
We must wait and see.




=====
Yo no estoy hablando de teorías.
Yo soy exponiendo los hechos.
Es un hecho que los geólogos utilizan VLF para localizar las cosas bajo la tierra.
Todos hemos conocido este hecho desde hace muchos años.
Esto no es un nuevo avance en el conocimiento.
Usted puede ver mis mensajes en el foro Geotech (año 2006), donde discutí con Carl-NC a decir el oro puede corroer en pequeñas cantidades cuando se entierra en el suelo.
Mira aqui: http://www.longrangelocators.com/for...1392#post41652

Yo digo el mismo hoy como lo que dije en 2006.
Lo que ha cambiado es la compañía de SGS ha realizado miles de pruebas desde el año 2006 para demostrar que forma iones de oro en el suelo.
Así que aprendí la química para la formación de iones de oro es ligeramente diferente

Usted puede ver que no he aprendido pseudociencias nuevas de LRL.
Nadie ha conseguido que me enseñe que los tesoros enterrados resuenan a una frecuencia que puede detectar con un receptor direccional para localizar el tesoro.

Yo tengo una LRL en préstamo que no puede ayudarme a localizar cualquier tesoro. Tampoco puede ayudar a cualquier otra persona que trató de localizar cualquier tesoro.
Así me enteré nada nuevo, salvo lo que algunos científicos enseñan de oro enterrado.
Tal vez la compañía Crypton presentará una LRL buena que puede ser utilizado por cualquier persona para localizar metales enterrados.
Debemos esperar y ver.

Abrazos
=====


Best wishes,
J_P