Mineoro News

[hung]

Just thought I'd give an update on the FG78.
Talked to the people there and the new units will be ready to be shipped next week. Apparently there are new features which were not advertised initially such as the ionic field reducer for pinpoint a big object which could produce a 300 feet diameter field.
Prior to that I had to use a 2 kv generator to depolarize it.
Can't wait to try this thing...

[michael]

Back to pld sensor

Hi Hung,
visiting mineoro site see they have changed the sensor from telescopic to
old type in FG 78. the question is; what was problem with telescopic antenna?
If they have done carefully survey and research, why again did turn back to
the old plan?

[hung]

Hi Michael,

You're right. They switched the telescopic antenna project initially planed to an ionic chamber type aerial.
But this is not the 'old' ionic chamber per se. It's a new concept which includes infra red inside it. It was developed for the fresh gold detection.
This proved to be even more effective than the telescopic antenna concept.

I think two models will be available. A one metal (gold) and the 2 metal (silver-gold) version. But I can be wrong.

Anyway, I should get one till the end of next week. I'll post my impressions. . Regards.

[ma330]

minero & bandido

hi to all;
please send for me schematic minero& pcb& part list and coils .
i want information about bandido Umax ii .(about depth deting)???
tank you .good nice . good byyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

[michael]

Anyway, I should get one till the end of next week. I'll post my impressions. . Regards.

Thank you dear Hung.do you mean they at first designed FG78 with telescopic antenna and then immediately(after a short while)made advanced version?!!
Anyway I think most of interested guys specially this forum members are
very willing to know of your gotten experiences about it.

Another thing; If you can make communication with them please ask ;why
don't put any new report of new founds by latest models like as GDM 428,
GDP 538,Dc 2006 and a Wmv file of how FG78 works?
Regards.

[hung]

Michael,

Actually they did not 'made an advanced version' for the FG 78.
The old picture which displayed the 'telescopic antenna' was of the prototype. Damasio who is an extremely perfectionist person , besides being a genius in my opinion, is always striving to acomplish the latest state of the art technology on Mineoro detectors. That's why it took a little while for the FG to show up.
The new ionic chamber turned to be much more effective than the one with a telescopic aerial. So the first alternative finally went into production.
I heard he considered a laser sight but it did not work along with the ionic chamber. Maybe later... You also can see in Mineoro's site that the new models work with only 25 % of ionic field intensity. This is a landmark as previous models only worked with fields well above 50%.

Regarding the new findings, it's already there on the site. The FG however is new and the only target found previous to production was the one which served as test target, that is, the almost 2 tons of gold which belonged to a governor.

[michael]

Thanks a lot Hung.

Regarding the new findings, it's already there on the site.

I have seen no founds by new models the reports are only from PDC 205 & 210

The FG however is new and the only target found previous to production was the one which served as test target, that is, the almost 2 tons of gold which belonged to a governor.

Please write more about this test details such as; distance and depth of detection and soil + weather conditions.
Anyway please put all of the new results and experiences about latest models
specially FG78 and don't deprive us from them.

[hung]

I have seen no founds by new models the reports are only from PDC 205 & 210

The first four findings in this link were found using the GDM 428 and GDP 538
http://www.mineoro.com/tesouros/achados01.htm

The DC 2006 was released in the end of january, so it's kind of recent.
But I know two guys here in Brazil who found a lot of items in the beach 2 or 3 days in a row in February. Maybe Mineoro did not have the time or bothered to post such items in the site yet...

[jojo]

actual test

Hello to mineoro owner,

Have you try coating the gold with paint or put in a container with
oil on it,or painting it with resin type paint in black color,can the ions
still be detected by the mineoro detector specially there new model
FG78 and DC2006 series?is there a way to block the ions release by gold
to escape detection on mineoro detector?can you try this test for me
HUNG and ESTEBAN?

Thank you in advance

jojo

[michael]

3 Q of mineoro using

Hi Dears Hung and Esteban .
There is 3 important questions about using mineoro:
1-Wherever the surface of soil has been ploughed for agriculture or be
subsoiled, won’t frustrate or demolish the ion field of buried target, then
mineoro be not able to detect it?

2- Have you or anybody else who you know, searched and detected in a
wooded area without any problem? In other words, don’t the trees induce
false signals or forbid and blind the detection?

3- As you had mentioned nearly this;" the mineoro user have to practice and acquire experience to be able to detect appropriately by it..." then, can we deduce; mineoro using is not as simple as the advertised movies in it's site?
If you don’t have the answers and can communicate with mineoro
inventors, please ask them and consider to these notes especially in your
FG78 tests.
Your answers will be appreciated.
Regards,Michael

[Esteban]

Hi

1. The removal of soil and target, the electric field dissapears. If the target is more depth respect the ploughed soil, you can detect it.

2. Yes, I have localized a site, forest area, big trees, and the signal is good, but is private property...

3. With the models 205 and 210, the target show a big angle detection, maybe 60º or more. This is the reason why is difficult to find the exact point. Don't know the accuracy of new models, 2006 and FG, I have not yet for to test. Between the days 13 to 16 April I'll go in trip with 2006 or FG model.

[michael]

Thanks a lot dear Esteban.
At least I am impatiently waiting for your new reports of new models. please consider to these notes in your tests. I think other members are as well as waiting for and follow these.

[Jim]

2. Yes, I have localized a site, forest area, big trees, and the signal is good, but is private property...

If the property is private, and the target not retrieved...how would one know that the signal is good?

[Esteban]

Migrate reply

If you adjust properly in the limit the 2 knobs, you will find objects, you must be delicate in the adjustment. Remember: small objects only produces microvolts umbalance...

There are only two reason why you never find nothing (always refers the 2 knobs model, no automatic): bad adjustment or failures in the detector.

Jim: The signal is good because is very insistent in the point, and the zone is totally free of interference. I want to return in the site with the landlord. Also I ear the property (22 ha = 220.000 m2) is for to sale.

[hung]

Depending on the knid of disturbance on the ionic field and how serious it is, it will take time to recover and build up again. This could vary from a couple of hours to even days, as in the case one uses a regular EM detector on the site which will 'eat up' the ionic fields.

As Esteban said, the PDCs and thenew models for sure don't give false signals. The only other reason it will emit beeps is when an electrical discharge is cloe nearby, such as power lines or thunderbolts.

The FG78 is facing a delay but in a few days I will get mine and was invited by Damasio to go with him to test it in an expedition.