Tweet
@ Qiaozhi
> In that case the Alonso PDK cannot work either, as it is contains an exact copy of the Heathkit GD348, plus a ferrite receiver circuit.
Oh, It contains even an exact copy, very interesting for Geo, our fantastic LRL-schematic-copyright-advocate.
Well, it was not me who said that the usual metal-detector radiation would destroy the "LRL-phenomenon" - other persons made that discoveries and: more than one!
They even claim that it doesn't work if the ground was moved by machines as its the case when a farmer works on the fields.
> Anyway, TOTeM has a switch that turns off the transmitter so that it can operate in passive mode.
Unbeatable argument, I must confess!
Congratulations, this switch has saved the TOTeM.
Originally Posted by Funfinder
btw. those PDK and Mineoro "passive receiver" circuits are not at all detecting metal objects the long range !!!
Compare it with a light source:
The closer you come the brighter the light source will be for your eyes. Thats not the LRL case -
suddenly - close to the find - the signal tears apart, goes off.
So if the LRL really would detect the target itself, it would not go off.
And thats why it seems the LRL only is able to detect the distorted field around the object!
btw. this is the perfect argument to defeat a LRL-reseller if he writes on his advertisment that his LRL is able to detect gold from a distance etc.
Because such writing is a proven lie if the detector only is capable to detect some sort of distortion-field around the object and not the object itself!
Hahaha, its great to be clever in this world full of bas***ds to defeat yourself against all those who wanna mess up your own life!
You will also save alot of money while fools get cheated all the way!
> Are you now saying that it must have a transmitter in order to function as an LRL?
Who cares if the LRL / PDK / Alonso circuit contains a transmitter?
I don't understand - why I should think it must have a transmitter?
> Previously you stated that it couldn't possibly work if it had one!
Transmitter never was a topic at all, I just wrote that some persons claim that the usual metal detector radiation destroys the "LRL-phenomenon" and therefore this TOTeM construction is highly questionable as a good demonstration or experimenting object.
The TOTeM absolutly needs the following warning sticker:
"Switching to real working metal detecting mode may destroy the LRL-phenomenon-force-field around you!"
> Go ahead, order the book, build TOTeM, and then experiment with both the passive and active modes.
Perhaps the best idea, but now a question to you Qiaozhi only you can answer:
I guess you have built and tested the TOTeM by yourself and after your statements the result concerning LRL-detection is "trick of the mind". For me this indicates that Morgan and Geo are tricked by their own mind because both of them tell us that they get real working results with the same kind of circuit stuff!
Who's right now, you or they?
> Then you will know the answers, and won't have to keep asking the same questions ad infinitum.
I won't ask ad infinium and I think building this stuff by myself is not the only solution to get satisfying answers because we have already more than enough persons out there that have some experience with this kinda stuff.
This forum is for information and we should find at least a way to get the real counting one!
If I would have a really working LRL I would give you all the crucial and important info, I would make serious tests and would answer all the really needed questions! So I don't understand why others refuse their real needed cooperation!
They are destroying the opportunity for everyone for geting needed and imporant results!
Its their fault if persons who read here still buying crappy LRLs because they had no chance geting clear results!
So be useful or go away, all you "LRL story providers" and don't make me sick with your headaches causing mental junkfood!
What is the prognosis for this forum for the year 2020???
Let me guess:
Oh what a shame, still nowbody here has a clue if LRLs proven work or not!
What a poverty-certificate !!!
Congratulations, longRangeLocators Forum!
How cheap is this whole situation?
People who can't prove the LRLs neither OK nor wrong!
> In that case the Alonso PDK cannot work either, as it is contains an exact copy of the Heathkit GD348, plus a ferrite receiver circuit.
Oh, It contains even an exact copy, very interesting for Geo, our fantastic LRL-schematic-copyright-advocate.
Well, it was not me who said that the usual metal-detector radiation would destroy the "LRL-phenomenon" - other persons made that discoveries and: more than one!
They even claim that it doesn't work if the ground was moved by machines as its the case when a farmer works on the fields.
> Anyway, TOTeM has a switch that turns off the transmitter so that it can operate in passive mode.
Unbeatable argument, I must confess!
Congratulations, this switch has saved the TOTeM.
Originally Posted by Funfinder
btw. those PDK and Mineoro "passive receiver" circuits are not at all detecting metal objects the long range !!!
Compare it with a light source:
The closer you come the brighter the light source will be for your eyes. Thats not the LRL case -
suddenly - close to the find - the signal tears apart, goes off.
So if the LRL really would detect the target itself, it would not go off.
And thats why it seems the LRL only is able to detect the distorted field around the object!
btw. this is the perfect argument to defeat a LRL-reseller if he writes on his advertisment that his LRL is able to detect gold from a distance etc.
Because such writing is a proven lie if the detector only is capable to detect some sort of distortion-field around the object and not the object itself!
Hahaha, its great to be clever in this world full of bas***ds to defeat yourself against all those who wanna mess up your own life!
You will also save alot of money while fools get cheated all the way!
> Are you now saying that it must have a transmitter in order to function as an LRL?
Who cares if the LRL / PDK / Alonso circuit contains a transmitter?
I don't understand - why I should think it must have a transmitter?
> Previously you stated that it couldn't possibly work if it had one!
Transmitter never was a topic at all, I just wrote that some persons claim that the usual metal detector radiation destroys the "LRL-phenomenon" and therefore this TOTeM construction is highly questionable as a good demonstration or experimenting object.
The TOTeM absolutly needs the following warning sticker:
"Switching to real working metal detecting mode may destroy the LRL-phenomenon-force-field around you!"
> Go ahead, order the book, build TOTeM, and then experiment with both the passive and active modes.
Perhaps the best idea, but now a question to you Qiaozhi only you can answer:
I guess you have built and tested the TOTeM by yourself and after your statements the result concerning LRL-detection is "trick of the mind". For me this indicates that Morgan and Geo are tricked by their own mind because both of them tell us that they get real working results with the same kind of circuit stuff!
Who's right now, you or they?
> Then you will know the answers, and won't have to keep asking the same questions ad infinitum.
I won't ask ad infinium and I think building this stuff by myself is not the only solution to get satisfying answers because we have already more than enough persons out there that have some experience with this kinda stuff.
This forum is for information and we should find at least a way to get the real counting one!
If I would have a really working LRL I would give you all the crucial and important info, I would make serious tests and would answer all the really needed questions! So I don't understand why others refuse their real needed cooperation!
They are destroying the opportunity for everyone for geting needed and imporant results!
Its their fault if persons who read here still buying crappy LRLs because they had no chance geting clear results!
So be useful or go away, all you "LRL story providers" and don't make me sick with your headaches causing mental junkfood!
What is the prognosis for this forum for the year 2020???
Let me guess:
Oh what a shame, still nowbody here has a clue if LRLs proven work or not!
What a poverty-certificate !!!
Congratulations, longRangeLocators Forum!
How cheap is this whole situation?
People who can't prove the LRLs neither OK nor wrong!
Comment