Originally posted by Nicolas
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
My new KING LRL V 4.1
Collapse
X
-
Hi dear physicist Carl Mound from white's Metal DetectorsOriginally posted by Carl-NC View PostNo, it doesn't.
"" How No, this is not the case.? ""
I know you. First Against for doising
Now and Against NMR and You're a physicist !!!!!!!
It's funny dear Carl. Back then it Is to studies.
I remember you only this:
The principle of NMR usually involves two sequential steps:
- The alignment (polarization) of the magnetic nuclear spins in an applied, constant magnetic field H0.
- The perturbation of this alignment of the nuclear spins by employing an electro-magnetic, usually radio frequency (RF) pulse. The required perturbing frequency is dependent upon the static magnetic field (H0) and the nuclei of observation.
Cordially
NicolasGod bless all - Nicolas
<< My channel >> << My shop >>
Please do not demand Private Messages .... I cant reply all here....For more information you can send me email ....Thank you for understanding
Comment
-
That's gotta be the worst LRL movie I've ever seen. Absolutely awful, I can write funny numbers on a piece of paper with a pencil faster than that, and I'm smart enough not to waste anyone's time posting a YouTube video so they can watch me do it, you'll just have to take my word for it! .....There is a logic to it however, and that's the principle in marketing of "qualifying the customer". In the case of selling an LRL, you want the customer to be someone who has already demonstrated their willingness to be abused and lied to, so that after they've bought the damn thing and it doesn't do anything useful whatsoever other than to serve as a funny toy, the customer will not go public with bad publicity.
And Nick, if what you were doing was NMR, you would not be posting about it here in an LRL forum, you'd be posting in a geophysics forum! What you are doing is not NMR and everyone knows it including you, therefore if you post in a geophysics forum saying your gadget is NMR you will be thrown out as a fraudster. This is an LRL forum, which means here we accept that the discussion is about fraudulent apparatus, you don't get thrown out for posting about LRL's.
Locating apparatus that actually works on scientific principles is NEVER called "LRL"-- the designation "LRL" is used only for fraudulent locating apparatus. You can search the entire history of this forum and not once has anyone developed an electronic locating apparatus that actually works and posted here describing it as an "LRL". If that's not enough, you can check out the LRL forum on Treasurenet and it's the same story-- apparatus that isn't fraudulent is NEVER referred to as "LRL".
Therefore your funny little post about the two things that NMR is, is irrelevant (although from a technical perspective you have described what your gadget is not, just as Carl said.) What's relevant is that you have come to an LRL forum to talk about NMR, getting mad at people who know what NMR actually is and can call you out on your BS. At least here, everyone (including yourself) agrees that what you have is in the category of "LRL", that's why this is for you the logical place to be posting.
You old-timers, this whole thing is another example of "read the advertisement!" Nick is advertising an LRL, and his own actions and words have revealed that the damn thing is a fraud. If you're in denial, send him a private email and ask him how much he'll sell it to you for. If you buy it, Nick will get a good deal, and you will get what you deserve.
--Dave J.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dave J. View PostThat's gotta be the worst LRL movie I've ever seen. Absolutely awful, I can write funny numbers on a piece of paper with a pencil faster than that, and I'm smart enough not to waste anyone's time posting a YouTube video so they can watch me do it, you'll just have to take my word for it! .....There is a logic to it however, and that's the principle in marketing of "qualifying the customer". In the case of selling an LRL, you want the customer to be someone who has already demonstrated their willingness to be abused and lied to, so that after they've bought the damn thing and it doesn't do anything useful whatsoever other than to serve as a funny toy, the customer will not go public with bad publicity.
And Nick, if what you were doing was NMR, you would not be posting about it here in an LRL forum, you'd be posting in a geophysics forum! What you are doing is not NMR and everyone knows it including you, therefore if you post in a geophysics forum saying your gadget is NMR you will be thrown out as a fraudster. This is an LRL forum, which means here we accept that the discussion is about fraudulent apparatus, you don't get thrown out for posting about LRL's.
Locating apparatus that actually works on scientific principles is NEVER called "LRL"-- the designation "LRL" is used only for fraudulent locating apparatus. You can search the entire history of this forum and not once has anyone developed an electronic locating apparatus that actually works and posted here describing it as an "LRL". If that's not enough, you can check out the LRL forum on Treasurenet and it's the same story-- apparatus that isn't fraudulent is NEVER referred to as "LRL".
Therefore your funny little post about the two things that NMR is, is irrelevant (although from a technical perspective you have described what your gadget is not, just as Carl said.) What's relevant is that you have come to an LRL forum to talk about NMR, getting mad at people who know what NMR actually is and can call you out on your BS. At least here, everyone (including yourself) agrees that what you have is in the category of "LRL", that's why this is for you the logical place to be posting.
You old-timers, this whole thing is another example of "read the advertisement!" Nick is advertising an LRL, and his own actions and words have revealed that the damn thing is a fraud. If you're in denial, send him a private email and ask him how much he'll sell it to you for. If you buy it, Nick will get a good deal, and you will get what you deserve.
--Dave J.
Thank you
but I prefer not answer
and I not would making marketing dear Dave .j
because I have my forum
and the price is 4500 $ .I have nothing to hide
and not fraude it
I sold more than twenty is I not problem dear friends
and also the people know what this type of king if you not know
I accept criticism
but if you do not know what. It's your problem
why you are the best? and laugh at us Arabs
but we also know we do dear sir scholar
Cordially
NicolasGod bless all - Nicolas
<< My channel >> << My shop >>
Please do not demand Private Messages .... I cant reply all here....For more information you can send me email ....Thank you for understanding
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qiaozhi View PostCrikey!
I must be in the wrong business. $4500 x 20 = $90,000.
Yes If not believe you can answer or find that it not hide my friend Qiaozhi
and no one forces you to buy this doising fraud if you dont like it
only we see you insult people
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?15566-New-Detector-quot-Nokta-quot-DPR!!!!&p=92891#post9289
and you are selling Pd with your friend Carl .It is that you do not accept our Lrl
Discussions on LRLs which do not include swivel methods, including "Ionic" and "Pistol Detector" devices.
CordiallyGod bless all - Nicolas
<< My channel >> << My shop >>
Please do not demand Private Messages .... I cant reply all here....For more information you can send me email ....Thank you for understanding
Comment
-
Okay, I guess nobody has to send Nick a private email to find out the price tag after all. It's $4500.
If someone is so rich that they can spend $4500 on something without even first finding out what the heck it is, they obviously don't need the money. So Nick may as well have their $4500.
If someone actually does a little research and after finding out what it is they still want it, that kind of behavior should be punished and Nick has already told them what the fine is. $4500, and Nick may as well be the one to collect the money.
--Dave J.
Comment
-
ATARI strikes back
Hey folks! Lunch break in the middle of a busy day. Time to read the comics and wow...
Is it true Nick? carlie and ozzy georgie are selling their Atari that makes funny noises as a working LRL?
So, the book sales were not enough to help pay the rent... sad news.
Don't listen to wharfie above Nick. You sold much more LRLs than he did with his useless floor polishers.
And $ 4,500 is a good price. Actually a bargain compared to $ 35,000 that JPlayer will pay for my Tubedec A-9000.
Time to go. See you around."Should exist injustice and untruths towards working LRLs, I'll show up to debunker the big mouths"
Comment
-
Firstly, it was joke. Perhaps you don't understand British humour.Originally posted by Nicolas View PostYes If not believe you can answer or find that it not hide my friend Qiaozhi
and no one forces you to buy this doising fraud if you dont like it
only we see you insult people
http://www.geotech1.com/forums/showthread.php?15566-New-Detector-quot-Nokta-quot-DPR!!!!&p=92891#post9289
and you are selling Pd with your friend Carl .It is that you do not accept our Lrl
Discussions on LRLs which do not include swivel methods, including "Ionic" and "Pistol Detector" devices.
Cordially
Secondly, I do not see any insults in your link that were made by myself.
Thirdly, you have obviously not read the book. If you had, you would understand that Carl and I are not selling any type of PD. The design (TOTeM) in Chapter 14 of the book is presented as an experimental concept. There is no guarantee of success, and I quote:
The purpose of this design is to develop a 'working' experimental platform for anyone wishing to investigate this grey area of metal detecting. This is a highly speculative area of research, and there is absolutely no guarantee of success. Remember - here there be dragons!"
The only cost involved is the price of the book (which covers many other aspects of conventional metal detecting) at $34.95, and some minor cost of components and a little time. In my opinion, this is time and money that is well worth investing, especially if you are at all unclear about the technology. The alternative is to get an expensive LRL education by spending $4500, and possibly learning nothing in the process.Last edited by Qiaozhi; 06-20-2013, 04:52 PM.
Comment
-
Written by someone who also has not read the book. Although (to be fair) we did say we would reject any payment from Hung, as we would hate him to actually learn anything useful.Originally posted by hung View PostIs it true Nick? carlie and ozzy georgie are selling their Atari that makes funny noises as a working LRL?
So, the book sales were not enough to help pay the rent... sad news.
Comment
-
Sorry my friend but with respect i just want to said that your videos did not show what everybody whants to see.... real detection and real prof.
I afraid that this is just another fake publicity.
How ever i still bealive that the phenomenum for LRL exist, but the device you are showing looks like a copy of another commercil device that looks almost the same. Indeed i have a friend of mine who owns one of these detectors. He paid a lot of money for his equipment that works the same principles of yours and until now (3 years testing on diferents fields, it shows is a scam. It does not work on locating anything
Give us a real proof and may be we can star bealiving you.
Nelson
Originally posted by Nicolas View PostHi Nelson
Yes, we are working on it now, especially for the second version of the fourth generation
For a fitter in its version of the first generation, second and third
There are some assets and his way of working
You can look my chanel in youtube
ِCordially
Comment
-
Originally posted by nelson View PostSorry my friend but with respect i just want to said that your videos did not show what everybody whants to see.... real detection and real prof.
I afraid that this is just another fake publicity.
How ever i still bealive that the phenomenum for LRL exist, but the device you are showing looks like a copy of another commercil device that looks almost the same. Indeed i have a friend of mine who owns one of these detectors. He paid a lot of money for his equipment that works the same principles of yours and until now (3 years testing on diferents fields, it shows is a scam. It does not work on locating anything
Give us a real proof and may be we can star bealiving you.
Nelson
Hi Dear Nilson
Yes here you have good said I accept the challenge
Stop and to insult the people
insult and laugh people
you do not see that you are all filled on me
persone does not obligate you to buy and pay $ 4500.00
the price you always put $ 35.00 does not include a rechargeable 9V battery or an LCD display or a 9V
if you think this is a DIY then you are wrong
people are not stupid and listen to your chatter
and I do not need your book
Cordially always
NicolasGod bless all - Nicolas
<< My channel >> << My shop >>
Please do not demand Private Messages .... I cant reply all here....For more information you can send me email ....Thank you for understanding
Comment

Comment