Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why cant metal detectors have longer ranges like 100 meters or higher?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Metals time around aura of magnetism create
    And generated spiral waves that can be identified from a distance

    No matter how the speed of light is high , Darkness is one step ahead .

    Comment


    • #62
      There is a device sold by Accurate Locators something like AGR receiver. It is a receiver that they say a local radio station can reflect off say a gold target at a certain fraction of the original frequency (depending on the resonant frequency of the desired target).

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
        There is a device sold by Accurate Locators something like AGR receiver. It is a receiver that they say a local radio station can reflect off say a gold target at a certain fraction of the original frequency (depending on the resonant frequency of the desired target).
        Thanks Mike, good explanation
        No matter how the speed of light is high , Darkness is one step ahead .

        Comment


        • #64
          I don't know where he came up with his theory. I mean the part about a fraction of the resonant frequency. I understand when an object radiates it does so at a lower frequency, but just exactly what frequency? The idea that a given radio station can cause the excitation is fine, but when you have so many different stations the radiated frequencies are going to be all over the scale and it seems likely that other elements will interfere. Now I'm not stating this as fact, just seems that way to me. Maybe it's not an issue.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
            I don't know where he came up with his theory. I mean the part about a fraction of the resonant frequency. I understand when an object radiates it does so at a lower frequency, but just exactly what frequency? The idea that a given radio station can cause the excitation is fine, but when you have so many different stations the radiated frequencies are going to be all over the scale and it seems likely that other elements will interfere. Now I'm not stating this as fact, just seems that way to me. Maybe it's not an issue.
            It shouldn't make any difference. You just have to believe, then it will work. As long as you also supply the necessary elements of selective memory and self delusion.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by Qiaozhi View Post
              It shouldn't make any difference. You just have to believe, then it will work. As long as you also supply the necessary elements of selective memory and self delusion.
              That's a happy condition to have. If you had to be concerned about all those different radio stations and harmonics, it might cause your head to explode.
              Hopefully there's some law of science that makes the millions of frequencies fizzle away when you get farther away from them.
              A treasure hunter might need to study RF propagation to see what are the implications to "Phenomenon" sensors.

              Better yet, just believe... and be happy.

              Best Wishes,
              J_P

              Comment


              • #67
                , just

                Yeah, well you guys are the ones who don't have an LRL. Or should I say you have convinced yourselves that it can't possibly work. I'm not against the pistol type detectors, just haven't seen or heard of anything of that type that can begin to compete with the frequency generators. And I have built other types of locators that rely a little more on dowsing. So who is delusional here? Reminds me of the Elvis song Hound Dog.

                Comment

                Working...
                X