Tweet
I didn't design this test "against you". I designed it to test people's ability to objectively detect signal lines with L-rods. Not sure why you take this so personally.
All your questions have been honestly answered at one time or another during that period, Yet, you intentionally ignore the facts in order to protect the Skeptic agenda and self promoting advertising gimmicks. Pretending to be a Scientist, or scientific, and being untruthful has been a habitual trait for as long as you have been attacking my honesty and credibility.
Let's hear how you would conduct tests that are of scientific quality.
No I have never used Carl's ABX design, and never suggested that I did. Common logic would question the accuracy of tests using the electronic X factor until it was determined whether or not the added electronic components of the auto switching device would affect the integrity of the signal. But that's only one factor to be considered.
Unfortunately, Carl's prejudice, bias, and selfish personal agenda has clouded his ability for rational thinking and the use of common sense. Encouragingly, I have seen seen some excellent critical thinking by some of you who have not been nearly as well informed for years about the subject as Carl has been.
I am taken back by the mentality that would compare the analogy of using an LRL to that of using a metal detector. That argument is just plain egotistical meaningless garbage. Totally unrealistic thinking.
Carl, in light of thousands of people, including myself successfully using Frequency Discrimination, LRL, and Dowsing, as an aid to treasure hunting for at least 30 years, and your disregard for fact, or truth, you don't have a Scientific leg to stand on. It does not require a scientific study and it should be obvious to the lowest intellect that, "What has already been done, can be done again under the same conditions. Get Real!
Your self righteous belief that I am "Wallet Mining" and scamming my customers, and your stated intention to prevent folks from buying from people like me, you seem to think the use of any means, including lying, and false inferences justifies the end result. That is self delusional, and a dis-service to Science and the people that support you.
As I have said, If you would have devoted 1/3 of your time and electronic knowledge to developing a method to locate and discriminate deep buried treasures, that you have put into publicly attacking my honesty, and aiding Randi, in his efforts to cover up his own lies by attempting to destroy my credibility and put me out of business, you would have done a great service for Treasure hunters, including me.
I have never scammed any one in my life and your spread of malicious libel is totally wrong and you owe some big public apologies for the hurtful lies and damage you have perpetrated over the years. Dell
"WHAT HAS BEEN DONE, CAN BE DONE" 
Comment