Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ALONSO PD MISSION ACCOMPLISHED V1,V2

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by kostas87 View Post

    ..........
    Geo

    Comment


    • Dear Sir Geo,

      Good evening sir. I sent an email to you. Please if you have time kindly reply. Thank you.

      Regards,
      Sally

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Morgan View Post
        Hello to all in this forum, I came here today to informe all of you about some people who are selling Alonso PD clones worldwide for the amazing price of 20000 dollars each one,and the big lie is they said I aprove this LRLs, first of all I have nothing to do with this dark business ,and not aprove at all that kind of clones,since the begining I told the PD is unstable,and its for LRL beginers,a short distance locator. See the photo of this PD clones and be carefull,not fall into this trap,

        best regards
        hello friend morgan.I can now participate here..Tnx to Qiaozi..I beleived you have the diagram of alonsos pd..Can I have to try it for my project..of course with your help and advices my friend I maybe complete it and try to use in our site..we are currently digging a suspected treasure site with out any gadget so can u help me..Please email me jherickgenova@gmail.com
        Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you...

        Comment


        • Qiaozhi s diagram is correct
          to be willing is to be able

          Comment


          • Originally Posted by kostas87
            I do not have access to the secret forum that has a lot of information from esteban etc, but with the tests and some personal expenses I came to the conclusion that it does not take much to detect the phenomenon of the noble metal from a few meters away ... I think you need a sensitive receiver in combination with the sound generator, a BFO absorption system, and a beacon RF circuit and with the right combination can detect the phenomenon ..
            Geo:

            The secret is a good design, a carefully construction, a fine tunning and of course a strong phenomenon. Without phenomenon it is difficult to do a lrl to work!!!


            Geo is correct.
            The signal is not a line. It is the electrons flowing from the earth to the ionosphere. The amount of current flowing from the ground to the ionosphere is minuscule at any point on the surface of the earth. However. when there is buried metal that has ions migrating in the ground where it is located, then we see a larger migration of electrons moving upwards toward the ionosphere. The amount of increased electron flow is minuscule, so it is hard to detect. This means we need a very sensitive detector to detect the difference.
            (what we are trying to do is use a detector that is so sensitive that it can detect the difference in a location that has double the amount of ions moving into the atmosphere as there are in the adjacent locations). This is a VERY sensitive detector...!
            A magnetic wave detector seems to be the best choice of detector, because it is immune from the electrical interference that plagues the skies. However, the increased flow of electrons from the metal site can be stopped if any high energy is injected into it. What I mean by this is... if you were to scan the location of the buried treasure with a metal detector, the strength of the VLF or PI signal would neutralize any ions in the ground and stop the flow of electrons into the atmosphere. This means the target site would be made neutral, or the same as the surrounding ground, so you could no longer detect it.
            The moral is: When you build your treasure detector, be careful to not make your simulator coil too strong...!

            Thats the truth. Take it or leave it.

            Best wishes,
            J_P

            Comment


            • VLF or PI detectors Frequency in the HZ or KHZ band, does a high frequency FM, VHF, UHF or GHZ transmitter affect these electrons?

              Comment


              • Originally posted by brain View Post
                VLF or PI detectors Frequency in the HZ or KHZ band, does a high frequency FM, VHF, UHF or GHZ transmitter affect these electrons?
                All energy effects the electrons which are migrating in ions of metals that are buried in the ground. This includes vlf, lf, mf and hf as well as radar frequency. Even light frequency can alter the flow of electrons in the ground ions (light frequencies that are in the range of heat frequencies).
                The lesson to learn is to use your sensitive detector of electron flow, and use a minimal amount of stimulation energy. Then you will not deplete the increase of electron flow in the location of the buried metal.

                A very well designed detector can find a buried metal without a stimulator. But if a stimulator is used, it will cause a temporary increase in electron flow from the buried metal, so this will allow a poorly designed detector to also be able to detect the location of the buried metal.

                If a stimulator is used, then it should be limited to a low power level so it does not cause all of the ions that are in the location of the buried metal to become neutralized. If you send a stimulator signal that is too strong, then you will neutralize all the buried ions, and make the target metal invisible to your detector. The neutralized ions in the ground will look the same as the neighbouring ground which has no buried metal that your detector can find.

                The good news is you will see the buried metal has recovered from the over-saturation of injected energy within a few days.
                Yes, an over-stimulated buried metal site can recover, and then send out electrons that signal its location....


                Hope that helps.

                Best wishes,
                J_P

                Comment


                • Strange how LRL folks don't seem to have much to say about real science...
                  Even when there's a chance that LRLs could work... I musta skeert away awlla the LRL'rs...

                  Comment


                  • Are these electrons positive or negative?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by brain View Post
                      Are these electrons positive or negative?
                      Electrons are generally considered to be negative. But don't let that discourage you. Many people were negative about the concept of a round world when flat was the common belief of the best scientists of that time.

                      So if you find some positive electrons, then be the first to report it here in the LRL forum, and we will remember that you deserve the nobel prize for this discovery.

                      Comment


                      • In many articles I read in this form, I saw information that it was positive, this is the opposite of what you said. I would like to benefit from your experience in this regard. I have a Tesla type system.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                          All energy effects the electrons which are migrating in ions of metals that are buried in the ground. This includes vlf, lf, mf and hf as well as radar frequency. Even light frequency can alter the flow of electrons in the ground ions (light frequencies that are in the range of heat frequencies).
                          The lesson to learn is to use your sensitive detector of electron flow, and use a minimal amount of stimulation energy. Then you will not deplete the increase of electron flow in the location of the buried metal.

                          A very well designed detector can find a buried metal without a stimulator. But if a stimulator is used, it will cause a temporary increase in electron flow from the buried metal, so this will allow a poorly designed detector to also be able to detect the location of the buried metal.

                          If a stimulator is used, then it should be limited to a low power level so it does not cause all of the ions that are in the location of the buried metal to become neutralized. If you send a stimulator signal that is too strong, then you will neutralize all the buried ions, and make the target metal invisible to your detector. The neutralized ions in the ground will look the same as the neighbouring ground which has no buried metal that your detector can find.

                          The good news is you will see the buried metal has recovered from the over-saturation of injected energy within a few days.
                          Yes, an over-stimulated buried metal site can recover, and then send out electrons that signal its location....


                          Hope that helps.

                          Best wishes,
                          J_P



                          Hi J_P
                          Happy see you after long time .. about stimulator ?.Alnso pd using stong TX ?!!!!!!
                          When it power on .. how catch ions ???
                          Best regards .

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                            Originally Posted by kostas87
                            I do not have access to the secret forum that has a lot of information from esteban etc, but with the tests and some personal expenses I came to the conclusion that it does not take much to detect the phenomenon of the noble metal from a few meters away ... I think you need a sensitive receiver in combination with the sound generator, a BFO absorption system, and a beacon RF circuit and with the right combination can detect the phenomenon ..
                            Geo:

                            The secret is a good design, a carefully construction, a fine tunning and of course a strong phenomenon. Without phenomenon it is difficult to do a lrl to work!!!


                            Geo is correct.
                            The signal is not a line. It is the electrons flowing from the earth to the ionosphere. The amount of current flowing from the ground to the ionosphere is minuscule at any point on the surface of the earth. However. when there is buried metal that has ions migrating in the ground where it is located, then we see a larger migration of electrons moving upwards toward the ionosphere. The amount of increased electron flow is minuscule, so it is hard to detect. This means we need a very sensitive detector to detect the difference.
                            (what we are trying to do is use a detector that is so sensitive that it can detect the difference in a location that has double the amount of ions moving into the atmosphere as there are in the adjacent locations). This is a VERY sensitive detector...!
                            A magnetic wave detector seems to be the best choice of detector, because it is immune from the electrical interference that plagues the skies. However, the increased flow of electrons from the metal site can be stopped if any high energy is injected into it. What I mean by this is... if you were to scan the location of the buried treasure with a metal detector, the strength of the VLF or PI signal would neutralize any ions in the ground and stop the flow of electrons into the atmosphere. This means the target site would be made neutral, or the same as the surrounding ground, so you could no longer detect it.
                            The moral is: When you build your treasure detector, be careful to not make your simulator coil too strong...!

                            Thats the truth. Take it or leave it.

                            Best wishes,
                            J_P
                            hello j play!
                            I have read many of your posts when I look at posts. Your positions on each topic were very carefully written and understood with a lot of intelligence and understanding. Geo knows a lot of things and I have learned a lot from Geo I do not dispute it..the issue with the distance detectors that we have more or less something that works..but we are never happy..sometimes they do not work well other times they are affected by other signals ..but he is sure that there is always a solution and something that can be made to work very well .

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                              Originally Posted by kostas87
                              I do not have access to the secret forum that has a lot of information from esteban etc, but with the tests and some personal expenses I came to the conclusion that it does not take much to detect the phenomenon of the noble metal from a few meters away ... I think you need a sensitive receiver in combination with the sound generator, a BFO absorption system, and a beacon RF circuit and with the right combination can detect the phenomenon ..
                              Geo:

                              The secret is a good design, a carefully construction, a fine tunning and of course a strong phenomenon. Without phenomenon it is difficult to do a lrl to work!!!


                              Geo is correct.
                              The signal is not a line. It is the electrons flowing from the earth to the ionosphere. The amount of current flowing from the ground to the ionosphere is minuscule at any point on the surface of the earth. However. when there is buried metal that has ions migrating in the ground where it is located, then we see a larger migration of electrons moving upwards toward the ionosphere. The amount of increased electron flow is minuscule, so it is hard to detect. This means we need a very sensitive detector to detect the difference.
                              (what we are trying to do is use a detector that is so sensitive that it can detect the difference in a location that has double the amount of ions moving into the atmosphere as there are in the adjacent locations). This is a VERY sensitive detector...!
                              A magnetic wave detector seems to be the best choice of detector, because it is immune from the electrical interference that plagues the skies. However, the increased flow of electrons from the metal site can be stopped if any high energy is injected into it. What I mean by this is... if you were to scan the location of the buried treasure with a metal detector, the strength of the VLF or PI signal would neutralize any ions in the ground and stop the flow of electrons into the atmosphere. This means the target site would be made neutral, or the same as the surrounding ground, so you could no longer detect it.
                              The moral is: When you build your treasure detector, be careful to not make your simulator coil too strong...!

                              Thats the truth. Take it or leave it.

                              Best wishes,
                              J_P

                              Thank you for your explanation, I built a very sensitive magnetic receiver, on what frequency I must calibrate it to detect buried metals dear friend ?

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by abdou2014 View Post
                                Thank you for your explanation, I built a very sensitive magnetic receiver, on what frequency I must calibrate it to detect buried metals dear friend ?
                                What exactly does your magnetic receiver receive?

                                Best wishes,
                                J_P

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X