Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Modifying old LRLs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Good news, Geo!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Geo View Post
      Hi Pahom.
      I don't remember the number of diodes now but i think that it is D9B. I tried them on a crystal radio and they had better sensitivity with more clear audio. There is big difference between them and 1N60 or IN914 or AA... that you find on ebay.
      Pahom.. i checked diodes, yes D9B.
      Geo

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Geo View Post
        Pahom.. i checked diodes, yes D9B.
        I understood you. Previously, they were put by d9B a red stripe or two red stripes or red dots. Then he refused. Ask Kostas Russian d9b sent him something like that. If he didn?t spend them all.

        Comment


        • #19
          No problem with D9B, i bought 100 pieces before 3..4 years..
          Geo

          Comment


          • #20
            Pcb at right is an equaliser (schematic by Esteban). I plan to deconect it because i did n't see it to doing something better
            Also i plan to connect a potentiometer so to reduce the gain at places where there are strong magnetic fields, but i did n't decided how to do this.... by playing with the receiver pcb or by connecting a potentiometer in series with coil....

            Attached Files
            Geo

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
              Good news, Geo!
              Now i am ok... i have eagle's eyes...
              Yesterday and today i visited my lab and finished the mod of PD. Results inside the lab are fantastic... it has at least twice and more sensitivity. If outside the lab be stable then will be a lrl near the top of all i have.
              Geo

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by abdou2014 View Post
                what are the other modifications Mr Geo ?
                as i wrote at previous post i replaced in60 with d9b.
                also i gave a little pore power at stimulator oscillator. i wanted to connect a one stage preamplifier on coil but sensitivity is so big.
                frequency of Rx = 62khz and from stimulator 125khz

                Geo

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Geo View Post
                  as i wrote at previous post i replaced in60 with d9b.
                  also i gave a little pore power at stimulator oscillator. i wanted to connect a one stage preamplifier on coil but sensitivity is so big.
                  frequency of Rx = 62khz and from stimulator 125khz

                  Happy New Year! It's good that everything is fine with the eyes! Tell me, in this variant of RX -62kHz and TX -125kHz, which registers better Argentum or Aurum?

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Pahom Happy New Year for u and for all members!!!

                    Sorry but i don't understand what u mean with ""which registers better Argentum or Aurum""
                    Geo

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Geo View Post
                      Pahom Happy New Year for u and for all members!!!

                      Sorry but i don't understand what u mean with ""which registers better Argentum or Aurum""
                      In your experience, these frequencies are what kind of metal they found more.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        from my experience.. nothing... but before years i readed a research from a univercity where gold "responded" better at frequencies near to 62Khz. Also Alonso was ues this frequency often...
                        Geo

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Geo View Post
                          from my experience.. nothing... but before years i readed a research from a univercity where gold "responded" better at frequencies near to 62Khz. Also Alonso was ues this frequency often...
                          Thanks Geo! Maybe you have information and RX frequencies for silver!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Before years i had a file with all these frequencies but i didn't find it.
                            Maybe tomorrow to give a second try...
                            Geo

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Geo View Post
                              Before years i had a file with all these frequencies but i didn't find it.
                              Maybe tomorrow to give a second try...
                              Thanks Geo!

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Pahom View Post
                                Thanks Geo! Maybe you have information and RX frequencies for silver!
                                http://www.royalrife.com/metalfreq.html METAL FREQUENCIES This frequency list was researched by Dr. Toshihiko Yayama in Japan. He used the F-Scan with reagents and patients with known metal poisoning. Frequencies have been rounded to the nearest 100 Hz. To test for metals, a DIRP is done from 30,000-60,000 Hz in 100 Hz steps. The mercury frequency has been confirmed by others. These frequencies are intended for research in detecting the presense of metals. They are not intended for use as treatment. Treatment should include chlorella and other materals as needed. Arsenic 3040 ...


                                Geo

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X