Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bob Fitzgerald LRL Devices

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Another technique I use, though not as good as the double-crosser, I call the Tire Iron. Performing a sweep with one rod as you approach the target you hit the target field. If you have a sensitive touch, the rod will bounce off the field edge. Similar to how truckers check tire pressure, they hit the tire with a tire iron and they can tell if the tire is low pressure. The field edge can actually be stronger than the target itself. So you hit it from both sides and then find the target in the middle. It might not be exactly in the middle but somewhere in there. Square wave is what creates the wide field. Triangle wave is quite a bit weaker but gives a narrower field.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
      kaveh, don't worry about it if you son't want to give me your email. I had some info but some of it I don't want made public and the Private Message won't allow attachments. I probably have most of the frequencies anyway. But it dos make me wonder who you are and why you ask questions you already seem to know the answers. Happy St. Patrick's Day to all. May the Luck of the Irish be with you all.
      Hello Mike,
      Check your email.
      The reason I opened this thread was that there are many secrets in LRL and I was interested to know and talk about other people's experiences in this case, especially in the case of Fitzgerald devices. For years I explored with ion detectors like Totem, PD, etc., but I had no success in practice. I tested different devices and the ones I used did not have the necessary performance and were not reliable. The principles of their work were correct and scientific, but the devices were not made as they should have been and did not produce acceptable results.
      I have been working with Fitzgerald equipment for some time. These equipments are much better than ion detection methods. Chances of success are much higher using the old metal field finder. I tested in places where new metals were buried for several years or where old metals were buried. In all cases, Fitzgerald's frequencies worked and had good results.
      It can be said that if the metal is old, Gerald's devices can find it. But they are definitely not without errors and they have the possibility of errors.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Mike(Mont) View Post
        He says toggle the TRN. I call it "Shake it off" LOL Sorry I can't get good resolution. Frustrating. I can sse it fine on my cellphone.
        The images are not clear and cannot be read.
        TRN test or signal line rectification is an efficiency test. Without this test, it is not possible to find the main signal line. This test is one of the distinguishing features of Fitzgerald devices compared to other LRLs.

        Comment


        • #34
          Fitzgerald's devices are inefficient.They have mostly ineffective and incomprehensible compositions in terms of electronics
          I did reverse engineering on the latest model of Fitzgerald device.NAVIGATOR.
          This device only consists of an industrial signal generator.The only useful function of this device is to generate signals, and practically the rest of its parts do not work
          I worked with this device in practice and did not see any positive reaction to this intended test location.
          On the other hand, I worked with 2 devices from Deep Finders Company, which in turn were unique in the world of antenna trackers.
          TD Max and Black Hunter
          Both devices were very accurate The TD Max had a low depth radius and low performance compared to the Black Hunter
          TD Max had 2 particle filtering modes that worked relatively well.In contrast, Black Hunter has several filtering modes to remove particles and...
          I have been working with tracking devices for years, but none of them caught my attention in this way.

          I tried to reverse engineer the Black Hunter, but unfortunately, after opening the box, I was faced with a large amount of hardened epoxy, which practically made the circuits inaccessible.
          A friend of mine is bringing me a TD Max to reverse engineer soon As soon as TD Max reverse engineering, I will post information and schematics for you


          At the end, I will put the images of Fitzgerald's navigator device circuits.
          G.L

          Mustefa Ubram
          Attached Files
          Knowledge is the greatest wealth

          Comment


          • #35
            I have said all along, if you can't use the L-rods it doesn't matter how good the locator is. Try the Healey Double-Crosser sweep technique. It works! And it can help with negativity bias.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by mustefa ubram View Post
              Fitzgerald's devices are inefficient.They have mostly ineffective and incomprehensible compositions in terms of electronics
              I did reverse engineering on the latest model of Fitzgerald device.NAVIGATOR.
              This device only consists of an industrial signal generator.The only useful function of this device is to generate signals, and practically the rest of its parts do not work
              I worked with this device in practice and did not see any positive reaction to this intended test location.
              On the other hand, I worked with 2 devices from Deep Finders Company, which in turn were unique in the world of antenna trackers.
              TD Max and Black Hunter
              Both devices were very accurate The TD Max had a low depth radius and low performance compared to the Black Hunter
              TD Max had 2 particle filtering modes that worked relatively well.In contrast, Black Hunter has several filtering modes to remove particles and...
              I have been working with tracking devices for years, but none of them caught my attention in this way.

              I tried to reverse engineer the Black Hunter, but unfortunately, after opening the box, I was faced with a large amount of hardened epoxy, which practically made the circuits inaccessible.
              A friend of mine is bringing me a TD Max to reverse engineer soon As soon as TD Max reverse engineering, I will post information and schematics for you


              At the end, I will put the images of Fitzgerald's navigator device circuits.
              G.L

              Mustefa Ubram
              This is a sales ad. I know Deepfinders devices completely. These devices are copied from Fitzgerald devices and I have the frequency table that they provide to customers. With a slight change, they present the frequencies provided by Fitzgerald. Some time ago, the person who made the RD-PRO machine came to me and was not satisfied with the operation of the machine at all and asked me if I can make changes on this machine so that it can work.
              These devices are manufactured in Gonbad, not in England.
              Here we are looking for scientific topics. Find another way to sell your malfunctioning devices and don't give false information to others.

              Comment


              • #37
                Dear friend, I am not a seller. I have been a member of this site since 2012. I am not selling any of the devices that you have introduced, I am just giving advice. If you have just joined this forum, refer to my past messages.
                I do not know where it is produced! I bought this device in Istanbul, Turkey.My goal is to help other friends and reverse engineer these devices.No seller will expose their products to the public.Please be careful in expressing your opinions.
                Good luck
                Knowledge is the greatest wealth

                Comment

                Working...
                X