No, the "perverse" Remote Sensing sub-forum has the most part of the time more visitors than others.
Perhaps it would fairer to split the Remote Sensing forum into sub-forums as well. In your snapshot it's actually 11 to 6 in favour of conventional technology.
Here's a suggestion of proposed sub-forums:
1. Ion Chambers and Other Nonsense
2. Homebuilt LRLs / Experiments
3. Do Nothing Schematics
4. Dell's Cry Baby Forum (alias the Winders Windup)
Perhaps it would fairer to split the Remote Sensing forum into sub-forums as well. In your snapshot it's actually 11 to 6 in favour of conventional technology.
Here's a suggestion of proposed sub-forums:
1. Ion Chambers and Other Nonsense
2. Homebuilt LRLs / Experiments
3. Do Nothing Schematics
4. Dell's Cry Baby Forum (alias the Winders Windup)
I like that idea (not to sure Carl will)...great suggestion!! Two donuts for you, Qiaozhi
Hi,
seems that more interest is on Remote Sensing...well because there are many strange things happens there or supposed to(like in splatter movies).
People are actracted by bad-movies so why not by lrl-ing ?
I think lot of people are interested in remote sensing because discussion is sometimes funny, also.
Anyway, don't think we need a proliferation of sub-forums on the topic!
It's already enough for me.
Best regards,
Max
"Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
But we dont need a reason "
Comment