MD as long distance

[robert]

Schumann Resonance?


"..Schumann Resonance?..."


One of main thesis in my magistrate (27 years ago) was Schunamm principle....????
Now you are talking me about that???
Pfffoooof!!!

[Esteban]

"..Schumann Resonance?..."


One of main thesis in my magistrate (27 years ago) was Schunamm principle....????
Now you are talking me about that???
Pfffoooof!!!

I want to see the thesis or part of it, if isn't a secret.

Please, do you can scan a part of it (the part when is your name, of course. Ahh! maybe your name is a secret, RObert!)

[Qiaozhi]

Some devices are mine (the very less) and other of my "teacher", so for respect toward my teacher can't post any schematic. I learn of him and he only reveal me a part.

For example, these are evidences (as those pics of 1980 I have 100, include in sequences...). If you can't build a rocket and travel to the Moon, you accept as evidence the photos of NASA...

If you wish stay refractary in this theme, is your problem, no mine. With good intentions I put here. Open your eyes.

There is good evidence available that NASA actually did go the moon, and any nonsense that states otherwise is just ... well .... plain nonsense. I do not need to build a rocket to prove this to myself, or anyone else. BUT as far as LRLs are concerned - this is not rocket science. Clearly you have managed to build something, and (if this stuff really works) then a simple schematic would dispel any doubts. Let's say you post something that can detect a coin at 10m. Forget 70m, or even 500m, and in fact I would even settle for 2m. This would just be a proof of concept.
Personally I'm not holding my breath, and fully expect my request to be sidestepped as before.

[J_Player]

2m? ... maybe 4m...

Let's say you post something that can detect a coin at 10m. Forget 70m, or even 500m, and in fact I would even settle for 2m. This would just be a proof of concept.

Settle for 2m? I would prefer to see a design that will work to 4m, as this is enough for me to claim Carl's $25,000. If it works for 4m, then I could use the winnings to pay for the round trip to the test site and even to even buy Carl and all the spectators dinner and lots of Budweiser! ... and I would have way more than enough money left over for buying the remaining parts I need to finish building the "amazing Robertoro guaranteed-to-work" electronic treasure finder. Dang, maybe I could go on to claim the $1 million Randi prize...!!

Yaaa Babyyyy!!

[robert]

....

Esteban, you must be a joker!?

Still no proofs, still laic opinions and funny claims...

I'll be back! (Terminator)

[Esteban]

1,000,000 Randi's prize is for LRL rods, no for electronic long range detectors, please no mixing the thinks.

IR (infrared) + FM radio = 7 m in distance, depth for coin max. 50-70 cm.

IR + FM radio + magnetic absorption antenna = 25 m

And more and more combinations. Conclusion: an unexploded field with infinite possibilities.

Justly (and incredivel), electronic LRD can based in many systems, and ¡incredivel, surprise! nobody or almost nobody work in it in this forum.

[robert]

A lot of crap again ???


"...IR (infrared) + FM radio..."
What are you talking about here, Esteban??? You keep forgeting than i am expert for
radio. Especially FM radio!
A lot of crap from you lately Esteban??? I am gonna reconsider my attitude upon you!
Yes there is(was) ratio "detector" in some types of radio...but it has nothing to do
with any "detection" we want here!
FM radio = antena+front end+local oscill.+IF+"detector"+nf stage...
No to mention PLL in comercial radios....
I designed few uPC PLL's for radio so far. It was "good money" in the past. Now all
busted eversince small,cheap uPC occured on market. PIC16F84 for example....
I have nice PLL project based on 16F84 and 16F628....But, still it has nothing to do
with any detection we want here!
So, you probably put IR receiver at radio front end....so when "detecting"...no,no
"long range locating" (ha,ha,ha) is going on, you may hear some hums,mums or whatever
in speaker!???
C'mon Esteban, you are "sinking" more and more here! Wake up Esteban! Are you 8 year old
child or a man?
For the last time :
Can you stand here, infront all of us, and SWEAR and put some MONEY..that you, alone,
by yourself, ever detected coin on ...let's say...1 meter depth in the ground?!
Can you Esteban? Can you also repeat that in front of some spactators...? Can you?
Come here and answer!

P.S.
Here is only for you esteban; one of my diplomas....I have several of those....
Of course, i had to cover some fields on it. I have to stay unknown here, due my
professional obligations....
I am awared that this prove nothing....But anyway here it is just for you.
Print it, dry it and make some tea from it. Drink and enjoy!

[robert]

....



"...Sun magnetosphere,synchrinized cycles of sun stripe appearences,proturberances,magnetic
and hypermagnetic disturbances, gales...all those present usuall causes of minor and major,
cyclic and occasional changes in earth ionosphere, which is, due its flowing current
characteristics in direct relation with earth substance and all we can include in it.
Interesting thing is direct relation with human brain resonance! Through axons,nerve fibres
and nerve nets certain DC ion currents are flowing constantly. Shaped through electro impulses
with rate 30 km per second.
Interesting enough is mentioned speed. Just exact speed of earth rotation!!!?
Sun magnetic induction,including all relative disturbances directly influencing electromagnetic
parameters of ionosphere, and of course indirectly affects processes in human brain.
We can transpond this phenomena to other materials in surrounding nature.
Schumman resonances of earth ionosphere are compatible to range 1.5-20 Hz....."
Very low, as you can see.
This is just illustrative sector of much comprehensive, integral lecture i done several years
ago in one foreign institute of Physics.
I wrote it on Serbian language, lectured on German.....right now i have difficulties to translate
all on English, just for this occasion....just on Estebans demand. (like hell i will!)
Besides my English is not so good...i do not want to look funny here....
But point was not me to show up here (i could take it from anywhere on net...couldnt i?).
Point is to show you exact impossibility of using "Schumman resonances" in metal detecting....
If you have at least some brains, if you have at least minor inteligency, you will notice why
it is not possible to do that! Less is possible to gain any kind of LRL ever!
Many things you mentioned here, like; IR,FM, Schumman..blah...etc.etc...are things you are not
awared at all.Not conversant to talk about! Admit that.
I have noticed tendences here, among some members, to surf net, collect some "top-science" terms
and post those in their posts acting like they do know what is all about, for real!!!?
C'mon! Dont be such fools! Do not "act" here any more!
It is so easy to catch you in all your ignorance!
You are developing here a kind of populistic,naive-laic,"scientific(my ***)" talk and discussion
about subjects so distant from you small, incompetitive brains..!
You should stop with those tendencies! Just be as you are! No shame in ignorance! Shame is in
indolence, lack of good will to learn!
Esteban and others; be modest and you'll learn something. Otherwise you'll stay small and
ignorant for the rest of your lives....

[Esteban]

RObert: Sorry, but your bla bla bla can destroy what I know (and is very sad that all this can't learn in universities). Practice!!! Practice!!! Work in the open field!!!

Are your diploma downloading from the internet? Remember, I want to see your thesis!!!

IR + radio, yes, but you DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW!!!

No since you have learning, of course!!!

[Alexismex]

He Robert , c'est perdre trop de temps et s'ennerver pour rien de refleter l'ignorance de certains sur les lois fondamentales de la physique et de l'electronique a beaucoup d'amateurs de lrl...plus ils sont ignorants et plus ils sont tetus effectivement ...la physique quantique nous cache encore bien des mysteres mais ils ne remettent pas en cause les fondements... ...Comme radioamateur j'ai realisé des contacts par radio a des milliers de km comme par exemple depuis le Mexique aux iles Rodriguez dans l'ocean Indien ayant prix le contact en phonie sur 40mts avec une antenne yagie directionelle , 100 w d'emission et ensuite abaissant la puissance de 100 a 1 watt en QRP je continuais une conversation parfaite...comment avec une si petite puissance je pouvais continuer le contact S9 (ionisation ? etc...) ??? a une si grande distance ...d'autres experiences fantastiques aussi pleines d'enigmes (en haute altitudes de Volcan a volcan ,4000mts d'altitude)sur des distances de 2000 km , je me suis communiqué aux travers de sortes de tunnels ionisés de 2 metres de diametres avec un walky-talky (5watts bandes 144Mhz) etc....Mais de lá a detecter une monnaie a 500 metres c'est de la mythomanie....mal affectant beaucoup de chercheurs de tresors!!!! et exploité par des malins comme ceux de mineoro....bon salut du Mexique

[Seden]

A question for Carl

Carl,

Regarding Magnetotellurics, at what frequency would you be able to see something as small as a large coin? Is it the same relationship as in a VLF Inductance Balance metal detector (the higher the frequency, the smaller the object will be detected)?
In Audio Magnetotellurics it is used to detect very large structures several kilometers down,so why can't it be scaled up to where the higher the frequency the shallower the depth and the smaller the object to be detected would be?

Thank you for your help,

Randy

[robert]

...


Je suis d'accord avec toi. Attention de salaire sur ceci :

"… les ondes radio voyagent de l'ouest ŕ l'est avec moins d'atténuation qu'elles font d'est-ouest. La différence est environ 3 décibels plus de perte par 1000 milles d'est-ouest. C'est-ŕ-dire que les signaux voyageant d'est-ouest perd environ un 50% davantage de leur puissance par 1000 milles que les signaux voyageant de l'ouest ŕ l'est. Les signaux nord et sud de déplacement ne sont pas affectés. La vitesse également n'est pas affectée assez pour ne causer aucune différence mesurable dans la fréquence de la résonance... "

Entre autres, je suis l'amateur par radio également. Mais dű mon endroit, parfois je juste dois attendre la bonne propagation pour faire la communication.
Oui, l'Amérique du Sud montrée en tant qu'excellent endroit pour la transmission par radio. Mon ami, champion du monde situé ŕ une certaine côte au Brésil.....
Je suis tres désolé parce que mon Français n'est pas aussi bon. Le temps passé et moi l'avons perdu. Je ne l'emploie pas tellement souvent.
Les meilleurs souvenirs !



Esteban, no use to talk with you seriously any more...You are lost for good!
Until you offer some proofs here...you'll be considered as charlatan from now on!

[Seden]

Alex and Robert

I too am an Amatuer Radio Operator,small world. Robert, I was so glad in your last post that you said your french wasn't too good as I thought you were from France.

As you know this coming sunspot is supposed to be the strongest on record. I plan on getting a 10 meter SSB rig for my car as it will be effortless to work Europe on that band then with low power.

My mainstay has always been 160 meters as the men on their are true experimenters and respectable. That's why in America it's referred to as the "Gentlemens band". I also work 183.5 KHZ SSB and have for years. The ARRL has been trying for some time to adopt it as an Amatuer Band but so far no go. Right now their having hams test the 400-500KHZ slice to see if it would make a good band which in my opinion it would be extremely good. They wouldn't of choose it for Maritime if it wasn't good as you know.

Randy WD6ELU

[Carl-NC]

Regarding Magnetotellurics, at what frequency would you be able to see something as small as a large coin? Is it the same relationship as in a VLF Inductance Balance metal detector (the higher the frequency, the smaller the object will be detected)?
In Audio Magnetotellurics it is used to detect very large structures several kilometers down,so why can't it be scaled up to where the higher the frequency the shallower the depth and the smaller the object to be detected would be?

I'm not much up on MT. But I suspect that with MT, you would never be able to detect a single coin. Telluric currents are a large-scale phenomenom, and I doubt single coins would have any impact on the resulting EM fields.

But I may be wrong.

- Carl

[robert]

Yeah...
QRP ?
RIG ?

73