Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New Circuit for LRL

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Esteban View Post
    If brilliant scientist believe in guru...! Ehhhh! Why not for treasures!

    Wallace was himself somewhat mystically inclined. He was a brilliant plant geneticist, who had developed the first hybrid corn for commercial use, and a respected economist...

    History Lives Here at American Heritage Magazine. Browse 60 years of articles by leading historians, 14,000 historical artifacts, historic images, and 4,000 historic sites.


    The Great Seal in 1 dollar bill was idea of Wallace and president Roosevelt, both inclined to masonry and hidden sciences.

    http://www.unc.edu/~ltolles/illuminati/dollar.html
    Hi,
    do you belive in guru now ?
    Ok... if you belive in LRL you can also belive in guru... easy.

    Why not ?

    The eye has a very long story but problem is that cannot find treasures...
    that's the big problem.

    Kind regards,
    Max
    Attached Files

    "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
    But we dont need a reason
    "

    someone said...

    Comment


    • #17
      No me, of course, but Sharky all the time mention this, so he is not alone... (see these firsts figures in important position who believe!)

      Comment


      • #18
        hi esteban

        hi esteban can you give me ayuor e-mail in private message i want give you a question but mineoro please

        Comment


        • #19
          I think Qiaozhi's Guru in a Can is much more convenient. Nothing to believe, just open the can and instant guru! Very much the same as rub the lamp for instant genie. Does anybody know where I can buy some cans of Guru?

          Best wishes,
          J_P

          Comment


          • #20
            Austin Powers had some Mojo! But I don't think it was in a can.

            Tim
            Bringing metal detectors into the world of imaging!

            sigpic

            Comment


            • #21
              Boy Max I have worked with code warrior and vxworks, ecos seemed a bit odd to install in win2000...below Max quote

              """Many OS, my opinion, out there should be cancelled from the world of IT cause they are made in bad ways, with too many bugs , with too many inefficiency etc and applications the same.""""

              many programs are bad because they have beeen developed by substandard Indians, now they are doing applications for aviation, boieng etc , wonder how many will go down now without Uncle Laden involvement .... CMM Levels have been introduced as there were many flaws in design of software as these are being done by Indians since 20 years...if westerners did this there would have been no problems, no complex CMM levels...

              I do like Visual basic etc but what I pointed out is its being used to do office clerical works instead of scientific works...I just wanted to say that computers have changed "low pricing" to do more of daily routine works rather than control a satellite...

              Comment


              • #22
                New PI Opeating System

                Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                Oh.

                What operating system do you use to run these applications to solve the problems you described?

                Best wishes,
                J_P

                IBM has declared a new operating system & other free applicatios for download, I think we can use the new open source operating system from other companies, win 2000 or win98 copyright/patent was over by now we can now try to reverse compile win2000/98 to VB code and redesign from win2000/98 (making it easy, using the existing drivers &dll or modifying them too) a new advanced operating system for this projects and other business applications too and our forum team can join hands work together thru internet and develop a new operating system and make money apart from PI

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by sharky View Post
                  IBM has declared a new operating system & other free applicatios for download, I think we can use the new open source operating system from other companies, win 2000 or win98 copyright/patent was over by now we can now try to reverse compile win2000/98 to VB code and redesign from win2000/98 (making it easy, using the existing drivers &dll or modifying them too) a new advanced operating system for this projects and other business applications too and our forum team can join hands work together thru internet and develop a new operating system and make money apart from PI
                  Problem is that a "true" OS require 10^5..10^7 lines of hi-level code !
                  Ok ok... one could also do that programming having lot of time and in also a small group of programmers... but there are already like Linux or freeBSD etc etc and are cool and even free ...so why do you like to develop a new OS ?

                  Maybe I miss something ...

                  "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
                  But we dont need a reason
                  "

                  someone said...

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by sharky View Post
                    IBM has declared a new operating system & other free applicatios for download, I think we can use the new open source operating system from other companies, win 2000 or win98 copyright/patent was over by now we can now try to reverse compile win2000/98 to VB code and redesign from win2000/98 (making it easy, using the existing drivers &dll or modifying them too) a new advanced operating system for this projects and other business applications too and our forum team can join hands work together thru internet and develop a new operating system and make money apart from PI
                    Whatever you're smoking - you need to stop. Otherwise there may be some permanent damage.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Hahahahahahahahahaaaaaa...

                      Yup, I wanna steal Windows 2000 and Windows 98 source code... It's cutting edge, ain't it?

                      J_P

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by J_Player View Post
                        Hahahahahahahahahaaaaaa...

                        Yup, I wanna steal Windows 2000 and Windows 98 source code... It's cutting edge, ain't it?

                        J_P
                        windows is not cutting edge, its like riding from a bullock to an horse, gone are opcodes...why dont u reverse compile to vb , there is nothing to steal the code, the patents & Copyright are valid for 5 years I think, they need to publish the source code, as some older systems for special applications like scientific ones use win98, win2000, so they need to show theirs...older applications dont run on new XP or so versions, actually chip makers have to integrate an operating system into the cpu during manufacturing, and a provision for updating the OS

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by sharky View Post
                          windows is not cutting edge, its like riding from a bullock to an horse, gone are opcodes...why dont u reverse compile to vb , there is nothing to steal the code, the patents & Copyright are valid for 5 years I think, they need to publish the source code, as some older systems for special applications like scientific ones use win98, win2000, so they need to show theirs...older applications dont run on new XP or so versions, actually chip makers have to integrate an operating system into the cpu during manufacturing, and a provision for updating the OS
                          Hi,
                          problem is that VB is not any good for making an OS.

                          A serious OS will be made by C routines and critical time parts direcly in native code for the target CPU/family. If you don't use that... you can also make a working OS ... but speed will be affected and at the end the thing will be of no usefulness at all... becoming just another academic-work like there are many out there.

                          VB and other things like TCL/TK , PERL etc etc are good just when you have already the kernel ready and the GUI-engine up and running ...to write applications that need fast development and GUI-functions for the middle-user... that can't be locked at console-level applications.

                          Embedded OS chips... like Java-enabled ones... are good for cellphones and microwave ovens but not for e.g. an office automation platform... at least for now... cause they give no advantage respect to C/assembly made OS...even if they can execute as native the e.g. (hi-level) Java code!

                          That's why we all use C/assembly OS in our computers... and there aren't real competitors on the OS market today based on a different approach... even if e.g. Sun is trying to put ahead in PC arena a JAVA-CPU from the middle 90's... so far with no success.

                          Kind regards,
                          Max

                          "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
                          But we dont need a reason
                          "

                          someone said...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I am talking of application not OS, OS should be open ended not monopolised one....intel and microsoft tried to do this wit the chipsset

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by sharky View Post
                              I am talking of application not OS, OS should be open ended not monopolised one....intel and microsoft tried to do this wit the chipsset
                              Hi,
                              yes... you can reverse eng. VB ... it's easy... but knowing the VB madness, spaghetti-code and all bugs of disassemblers and similar stuff... I think you'll better have to search some hacker website (being invisible ) to find the sources just right there... I remember you that something like microsoft longhorn's source code was steal by an hacker group and made near-public-domain some time ago...

                              So you can save time, work and neurons that way.

                              About developing good-applications... well... Microsoft's one are not good examples of programming... very often code is full of bugs and require periodic patching process... patchwork maybe!

                              Anyway... you can program yourself much better applications than these but then you'll have to compete with big-brothers Microsoft, Apple, Sun etc and so your potential market cannot be so great e.g. on the office-platform... word-processors, spreadsheet-prog, email, presentation-prog or middle-user-db... you'll be busted by big companies MS, Oracle, Adobe etc etc.

                              So... if you want make money... forget office-applications and focus on other things... like more specific applications where big-boys don't play!

                              Kind regards,
                              Max

                              "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
                              But we dont need a reason
                              "

                              someone said...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Max View Post
                                Hi,
                                spaghetti-code and all bugs of disassemblers and similar stuff... I think you'll better have to search some hacker website (being invisible ) to find the sources just right there... source code was steal by an hacker group and made near-public-domain

                                So you can save time, work and neurons that way.

                                Microsoft's one are not good examples of programming... very often code is full of bugs and require periodic patching process

                                compete with big-brothers Microsoft, Apple, Sun etc and so your potential market cannot be so great e.g. on the office-platform... word-processors, spreadsheet-prog, email, -user-db... you'll be busted by big companies MS, Oracle, Adobe etc etc.

                                So... if you want make money... forget office-applications and focus on other things... like more specific applications where big-boys don't play!

                                Kind regards,
                                Max
                                software designed by substandard Indians so Bugs and patches are common, so came CMM level standards for software...
                                No need to search for hackers, Richard Brandler is there an NLP programmer, he can alter the structure of the CEO neurons and ceos's will themselves paste the sources on the net, or there are gurus in India they can do it...
                                Big players !!! they all come to Richard Brandler...I am not thinking of designing a new OS and flood market with new OS, an unique OS should be developed by chip makers and embedded into chips static ram, the source for this should be open to all.
                                I am not thinking of making money with this, I can make money with PI(Ihave some orders if Carl or others cooperate), I have seen enough stones lemon sized ones beneath, this is more than enough to get richer....

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X