Carl MFD article ,5KHZ frequency ?

[J_Player]

They hiding true LRL stories and schematics so Max cannot read and build same circuit?


Best wishes,
J_P

[Max]

They hiding true LRL stories and schematics so Max cannot read and build same circuit?


Best wishes,
J_P

Or simply there isn't any reliable documented LRL story.

You have to belive in someone photoalbum... good luck.

[Esteban]

You have to belive in someone photoalbum... good luck.

Why not! If I must believe in your findings and pics, you must believe in mine! Democracy!

[Max]

You have to belive in someone photoalbum... good luck.

Why not! If I must believe in your findings and pics, you must believe in mine! Democracy!

Hi,
not my "findings" and "pictures"... my "findings" or "pictures" have no value, and even my words anyone could disagree with and contestate, cause I'm not an authority like e.g. British Museum is...

Others findings and pictures that came from use of conventional MDs... a working technology.... and declared in all their importance to the world by authorities and reliable media are important.

The problem is that the absence of a single reliable ducumented case of big treasure claimed found by an LRL... give me the right of say that LRL-guys have no single reliable example their "pistols" actually found anything.

Even British Museum people understand the value of discoveries made with a metal detector... and there aren't dubts that, though many people use them without right experience or education and recover stuff without scientific methods, they were and are really useful in finding "treasures".

Big treasures, not fantasies or homemade pictures of who knows what...

Still can't see the link. Why I have to belive in your photoalbum ?
You are same time free of don't belive a single word or picture I post!
Democracy!

But... YOU HAVE TO BELIVE BRITISH MUSEUM. YOU CANNOT THINK THEIR WORDS ARE FAKE...CAUSE OTHERWISE YOU'RE A FOOL !

There are a number of examples like these that I don't post here to avoid annoying people with other readings.

But no single one good link to an LRL-discovered-treasure ? Why ?


Kind regards,
Max

[Esteban]

Of course, British Museum is out of discussion here. The problem is believe or not in the findings we post...

[Max]

Hi,
if someone show here a picture of something he said found with a metal detector and object is metallic and there is a reasonable probability that it will be detected at range indicated... why don't belive that person ?

But if someone say that found a coin buried at 3feet from 1 mile away using a startrek pistol... well... why belive him ?

Thats' the point. There are unrealistic claims... and homemade pictures can't say if it is just an joke or something else.

Is realistic think of finding a coin buried at 3feet from 1 mile away ???

For me is totally impossible.

For British Museum ? Well... we have to ask them... but I think if you'll ask you'll get lot of laughs... and maybe also a free ticket to visit expositions for free... to see real treasures , found with metal detectors, I mean.

Kind regards,
Max

[Esteban]

The more far I found was 70 m and few depth for a single coin. This is more real...!

[Max]

Have you called BBC ?

Or maybe you can call... ehm also guinness

70m for a single coin is good for guinness !

[Esteban]

70m for a single coin is good for guinness !

Yes, and is simple!!!

Regards

Esteban

[Max]

HI,
it's so easy that nobody will partecipate in the challenge... to find gold bars ,not a coin, and at much less distance, or also just under some paper cups !

Very easy is saying here that it is easy.
Less easy is show to the public they really work.

The only ease in all LRLs is claiming impossible results and/or sell them to naives.

All the rest simply doesn't work.

Kind regards,
Max

[Nihil Roma Maius]

You're sure doesn't works. I'm sure works. But, how much you –and others– work in this direction for to be sure?

Maybe classification of materials isn't the best, but detection of bad material at 3-5 meters is great, even an only oxidized nail or paper of cigarette's box!

Nobody can't judge since his inexperience.

Regards

Nihil Roma Maius

[J_Player]

...detection of bad material at 3-5 meters is great, even an only oxidized nail or paper of cigarette's box!
Nobody can't judge since his inexperience.

Maybe the person who has the experience can win Carl's $25,000. 5 meters will work fine to win Carl's prize.

If you can find the hidden oxidized nail 7 times from 10 attempts, then you will return home with $25,000 USD for fiestas and mucha cerveza.

Best wishes,
J_P

[Esteban]

Hi J_P

You can win in natural conditions of long time buried metal sites, as battlefield or other old relic sites, but no under leonine conditions, yes under conditions dictated by nature of the phenomenom.

If you can find the hidden oxidized nail 7 times from 10 attempts, then you will return home with $25,000 USD for fiestas and mucha cerveza.

Best wishes,
J_P


Is not equal to plant NOW 10 oxidized nails than oxidized by natural corroded process for many years.

Best regards

Esteban

[Max]

Hi J_P

You can win in natural conditions of long time buried metal sites, as battlefield or other old relic sites, but no under leonine conditions, yes under conditions dictated by nature of the phenomenom.

If you can find the hidden oxidized nail 7 times from 10 attempts, then you will return home with $25,000 USD for fiestas and mucha cerveza.

Best wishes,
J_P


Is not equal to plant NOW 10 oxidized nails than oxidized by natural corroded process for many years.

Best regards

Esteban

Hi,

so you can never say if it works or not in controlled conditions:

Who has a test garden of >100 or >1000years old ? Who can build one with same conditions you say are needed ?

Answer is : NOBODY.

The only result of your assertions is that any controlled test cannot be made.
That leave the users the last way to test if an LRL work is actually buy it !

You have first buy one, then test... so if you find nothing the dealer could always say that maybe there isn't any ancient buried anything where you tested the unit.

Too easy money I think.

But which kind of oxidation has e.g. gold ??? Which kind of e.g. halo could give you a gold item ???

I never found any gold item that showed halo! Never. I have experiences of halo from copper, brass, silver, lead...of course iron... BUT NOT GOLD.

For me fact that LRLs-guys pretend that their toys work only with long-time-buried stuff means just that they cannot win any serious challenge or test, so they can't actually prove their toys are really working as claimed.

So, the customer has to belive what a website or a dealer say... with the obvious result of a lot of frauds be performed.

Anyone could claim fantastic results... then giving no proof and steal money from your pockets.

If I buy a metal detector... and it doesn't detect metals the factory/manifacturer must provide a new or repair for free during warranty terms. Tesoro, as example, gives life warranty to any new unit sold !
It's a big warranty for the customer, and a very serious approach to business.

But if I buy an LRL and then cannot test if it works in controlled conditions, how can I hope of see again my money or that even warranty, if any, will be respected by manifacturer ??? They can always say that I cannot say their unit doesn't work... cause I need to test at their conditions, that are another nonsense.

With a metal detector I need a penny to see if is detected or not. Not so easy demonstrate that an LRL doesn't work as claimed if have to follow nonsense directives.

Result will be always: I'll lose money.

That's why I'll never buy an LRL.

Best regards,
Max

[Nihil Roma Maius]

Max wrote:

Who has a test garden of >100 or >1000years old ? Who can build one with same conditions you say are needed ?

Answer is : NOBODY.


If you read well, justly Esteban as independent experimenter go in inland, old sites, because he or nobody has virgin conditions, no removed soils, etc. This is clear for he and for all.


Max wrote:

But which kind of oxidation has e.g. gold ??? Which kind of e.g. halo could give you a gold item ???

Be truth! He told about oxidized ferrous objects, you're obscured for to discredite him to the eyes of other persons who read this thread!

But, If you don't know, percentage of copper or brass in gold can creates the necessary halo, maybe not in ancient pure gold.