Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

need simple device detects gold 1-2 meters depth

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • need simple device detects gold 1-2 meters depth

    hi friends;
    i need small and simple curcuit in small antena detects the gold underground 1-2 meters but i do not now to biuld it and do not know the gold frequincy that work on.
    i hap
    i hope i find it here but not as lrl
    i wish mr steban help me in this,
    most regards

  • #2
    Originally posted by abdlam View Post
    hi friends;
    i need small and simple curcuit in small antena detects the gold underground 1-2 meters but i do not now to biuld it and do not know the gold frequincy that work on.
    i hap
    i hope i find it here but not as lrl
    i wish mr steban help me in this,
    most regards
    Just forget about it...

    LRL = C.R.A.P.

    that's something about...

    Creative
    Revenues
    And
    Plucking (a chicken)

    So , even if you don't pay for one or make yourself, you'll be disappointed at the end anyway. If you pay for one you will be disappointed much more... and at the end you will desire kill the dealer or just wanna your feathers back...

    Kind regards,
    Max

    "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
    But we dont need a reason
    "

    someone said...

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by abdlam View Post
      hi friends;
      i need small and simple curcuit in small antena detects the gold underground 1-2 meters but i do not now to biuld it and do not know the gold frequincy that work on.
      i hap
      i hope i find it here but not as lrl
      i wish mr steban help me in this,
      most regards
      Not for small targets, yes for size cup or treasure (buried for long time). Simple absorptive circuit based on tape recorder (journalist type). Is very easy

      For gold, copper, bronze, silver & alloys.

      Soon, I'll post when finish other projects .

      Regards

      Esteban

      Comment


      • #4
        Hello esteban,Here in the us we can buy a small handheld amplifier powered by a nine volt battery,it has an internal speaker,an input plugin and an output plugin,would this work in place of the tape recorder by connecting a selenoid coil to the input as the anntenna.These units are very cheap,could we use them for an absorbtive receiver.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by gold24h View Post
          Hello esteban,Here in the us we can buy a small handheld amplifier powered by a nine volt battery,it has an internal speaker,an input plugin and an output plugin,would this work in place of the tape recorder by connecting a selenoid coil to the input as the anntenna.These units are very cheap,could we use them for an absorbtive receiver.
          You can use for anything you want... but you'll not find gold24 this way!

          "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
          But we dont need a reason
          "

          someone said...

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Max View Post
            You can use for anything you want... but you'll not find gold24 this way!
            Yes, you are right! You can use this as metal detector or vibration detector, or for any magnetic instrument you want, if you replace the audio head for other coil/s.

            Regards

            Esteban
            Attached Files

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Esteban View Post
              Yes, you are right! You can use this as metal detector or vibration detector, or for any magnetic instrument you want, if you replace the audio head for other coil/s.

              Regards

              Esteban
              But you forget to mention I'll never find gold24 this way!

              "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
              But we dont need a reason
              "

              someone said...

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Max View Post
                But you forget to mention I'll never find gold24 this way!
                For detect treasure = mass.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Esteban View Post
                  For detect treasure = mass.
                  Hi,
                  mass ? Also lead has an enormous "mass" compared to volume... really similar to gold but isn't considered as "treasure" ... at least in my place.

                  If you meant instead "density", change nothing.... concept is like above cause you refer to volume of object too, not just mass.

                  Maybe you think that lead is good to make jewels...I don't know...

                  I think that anyway you cannot detect gold or lead coins from meters away... and so all this talking about LRL is the same nonsense you always provided us, no proofs , no working schematics... nothing apart advertising about LRL that "really works".

                  Is e.g. the FG80 a working LRL or not ? You know about it... but many also here... make a real comparision with others ideas and life facts.

                  The truth is that no cassette player can be turned in a long range detector of buried metals... just the idea of using one make me laugh, not cause of electronics (most have very nice preamps) but cause of the idea of amplifing something you don't know or understand !

                  AMPLIFY WHAT ? THE BACKGROUND NOISE ?

                  Kind regards,
                  Max

                  "Kill for gain or shoot to maim...
                  But we dont need a reason
                  "

                  someone said...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Max View Post
                    Hi,
                    mass ? Also lead has an enormous "mass" compared to volume... really similar to gold but isn't considered as "treasure" ... at least in my place.

                    If you meant instead "density", change nothing.... concept is like above cause you refer to volume of object too, not just mass.

                    Maybe you think that lead is good to make jewels...I don't know...

                    I think that anyway you cannot detect gold or lead coins from meters away... and so all this talking about LRL is the same nonsense you always provided us, no proofs , no working schematics... nothing apart advertising about LRL that "really works".

                    Is e.g. the FG80 a working LRL or not ? You know about it... but many also here... make a real comparision with others ideas and life facts.

                    The truth is that no cassette player can be turned in a long range detector of buried metals... just the idea of using one make me laugh, not cause of electronics (most have very nice preamps) but cause of the idea of amplifing something you don't know or understand !

                    AMPLIFY WHAT ? THE BACKGROUND NOISE ?

                    Kind regards,
                    Max
                    Yes, not for long range, few meters, but lead "no emit" or no "create" the enough "field" for to be detectable. This can to beep one or two times, but is not consistent, as iron or aluminium. But copper, bronze, gold, silver and his alloys buried for long time yes "emit" the "field". Extrange but good!

                    OK, background noise can be a problem, but the sensibility point is adjusting at this level (remember, in all the world background noise is present and this can affect also any kind of metal detector).

                    The concept of long range detection is problematic, but method for 10-30 meters is absolutelly positive.

                    Regards

                    Esteban

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Esteban View Post
                      For detect treasure = mass.
                      Why not ? you could detect alterations in attraction forces in comparison with surrounding soil.But we know that this force in invertely proporcional to square of distance, so it is soooo weak...unless you are looking for tons of gold...
                      Should look to gravimeter.Maybe one will end detecting the moon
                      regards,
                      Fred.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Fred View Post
                        Why not ? you could detect alterations in attraction forces in comparison with surrounding soil.But we know that this force in invertely proporcional to square of distance, so it is soooo weak...unless you are looking for tons of gold...
                        Should look to gravimeter.Maybe one will end detecting the moon
                        regards,
                        Fred.
                        Fred, mass no in terms of attraction by gravitatory forces, yes regarding capability of "emission" of the phenomenom. At more big targets, more intense the "field" around this conductive metals buried for long time .

                        Regards

                        Esteban

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Esteban, what is that Tr coil?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bill512 View Post
                            Esteban, what is that Tr coil?
                            An oscillator.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              one oscilator is one simple circuit of eflusion of hig or low frecuencies from one coil, what are send to the ground for choke whit object and return and sensibilize the coil receptor

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X